er and the UAD-1's. Anyway, this is a fast rig.....real fast. All essential services are turned off and the registry has been pretty heavily hacked as well (after backing it up of course ;o) Guess I could have just bought a Mac and plugged in a couple of cables though....huh?
mmmm.......I wonder if that's the reason the Houston controller won't >> > work >> > any more. >> > >> > ;oP >> > >> > "erlilo" <erlilo@online.no> wrote in message news:43a525da@linux... >> >> .....dualprocessor shit;-D).....doublebrains can be a problem if the > one >> >> don't know what the other is doing or will do. So, do you have the > latest >> >> Cubase revision that's built to take care of these idiotic<br /
ome kind of psychoacoustic thing going on where the >piano >> sound appeared to hang all bunched up in mid air somewhere between my >eyes. >> >> So I tore the thing apart and re-wired and checked and re-checked and same >> thing. Then I found the 'MIX' knob on the pre-sonus does very strange >things >> to the pan positions when used in anything other than the full right >position. >> The mix knob is supposed to be presonus answer to monitoring live inputs >> with no latency. When all the way left you are monitoring live inputs, >when >> all the way right you are monitoring the computer mix. It was >counter-intuitive >> to use this thing all the way right when not even connected to a >computer, >> but there you go... >> >> So now I have an incredibly playable, fantastic sounding, great recording >> digital piano and it only took me three years of screwing around with >shitty >> MIDIMAN and ROLAND USB midi controllers, different versions of GIGA and >HALION, >> different computers, licensing
rbing. > > Cheers, > -Jamie > http://www.JamieKrutz.com > > PS. If you spec your system for what you actually need and don't settle > for something that falls short _or_ float with the hype of the latest > thing, you can get a very long life out of your equipment investments. > This is true no matter what type of system you choose. > > > Neil wrote: > > "James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > >>Anybody have any thoughts? > > > > > > The only thing I have against Macs is that - at least with > > regard to DAW applications - you're really locked into more > > proprietary stuff. Less flexibility... and that's the same thing > > I have against PT, now that sonically (at least IMO) the new HD > > systems are really quite good. If you need to upgrade your Mac > > at some point, you've got buy a whole new one... same thing > > with PT - every few years you're forking over another down > > payment on a house in order to get a new system just to stay > > current. > > > > Neilthe other day my cat walked over to my office computer and rubbed up against the front of the case where the power switch is located.......took me about an hour to reboot and get everything settled down......including the cat. ;o) "justcron" <caffiene@hydrorecords.com> wrote in message news:43a5a862$1@linux... > > hola Juan... > > The only thing that crashes me all the time is when my cat jumps up on the > desk and walks accross the C-16 :) > > John <no@no.com> wrote: > >I seem to be a crash magnet so I'm w
der function. Is there any way to get EQs also? I would really like a way to render all three. Thanks Here's the trick I do with SPDIF: SPDIF Rendering -------------------------- Patchbay workaround for bouncing tracks and rendering plugins Tired of zeroing/clearing a mix to bounce a track or tracks to a new file? Or wish you could render native plugins while listening and adjusting in context. No problem. Open the Patch Bay. Clear all your SPDIF I/O connections. Physically (as in, on the back of your Paris 442 or MEC) loop your Paris SPDIF in to your Paris SPDIF out with a short cable. Go back to the Patch Bay. In the Patch Bay, connect the "Mixer Insert" SEND of the source channel for the bounce to the left SPDIF output (dL) on your 442 or MEC. Connect the SPDIF left input (dL) back to the same channel's "Mixer Insert" Return to complete the loop. Now connect the same left SPDIF output to the "Submixer Input" of the Destination channel you want to bounce/record to. Select "External" on the EDS insert on the source channel. Enable Record on the Destination channel. That's it. Record away. You can use your mixer normally while you bounce with no ill effect. And in a case of good fortune, since the EDS inserts are after the native inserts, any active plugins will be printed while bouncing. Great for rendering AutoTune or various other plugin settings for different song sections. For the price
r /> DJ wrote: >the other day my cat walked over to my office computer and rubbed up against >the front of the case where the power switch is located.......took me about >an hour to reboot and get everything settled down......including the cat. > >;o) > >"justcron" <caffiene@hydrorecords.com> wrote in message >news:43a5a862$1@linux... > > >>hola Juan... >> >>The only thing that crashes me all the time is when my cat jumps up on the >>desk and walks accross the C-16 :) >> >>John <no@no.com> wrote: >> >> >>>I seem to be a crash magnet so I'm wondering what crashes you the most >>>in Paris? >>> >>>messing with inserts while recording? >>> >>>corrupted ppj project files? >>> >>>streaming errors? >>> >>>Thanks, >>>John >>> >>> >> >> > > > >So i'll just use another VST EQ like Sonalksis and render that. Thanks. It's all coming together.....or apart, I'm not sure. Rod Lincoln wrote: > nope > John <no@no.com> wrote: > >>That's a good idea. I don't guess there is a way to copy the graphic >>EQ settings to the VST plugin is there? >> >>Aaron Allen wrote: >> >>>Yup, sure is but you'll only do 2 tracks at a time, max. Run it through > > the > >>>bus as a mixdown muting all other tracks through the submix group or as > > >>>individual channels. Take the resultant L/R files and place them in a > > track. > >>>OR >>> >>>There is an easier way. Use the Paris VST plugin on a native insert. They > > >>>did a fantastic job of emulating the EQ on the port. >>> >>> >>>AA >>> >>> >>>"John" <no@no.com> wrote in message news:43a5d0b1@linux... >>> >>> >>>>I DO have BOTH Native and EDS plugs rendering if I do the SPDIF trick > > which > >>>>doesn't use the render function. Is there any way to get EQs also? I > > >>>>would really like a way to render all three. >>>> >>>>Thanks >>>> >>>>Here's the trick I do with SPDIF: >>>> >>>> >>>>SPDIF Rendering >>>>-------------------------- >>>>Patchbay workaround for bouncing tracks and rendering plugins >>>> >>>>Tired of zeroing/clearing a mix to bounce a track or tracks to a new file? > > >>>>Or wish you could render native plugins while listening and adjusting > > in > >>>>context. No problem. >>>> >>>>Open the Patch Bay. Clear all your SPDIF I/O connections. Physically (as > > >>>>in, on the back of your Paris 442 or MEC) loop your Paris SPDIF in to &g
/> >>>>possible since those are realtime CPU's. >>>>AA >>>> >>>>"John" <no@no.com> wrote in message news:43a565b0@linux... >>>> >>>> >>>>>I was testing rendering and it was doing the natives effects but not the >>>>>EDS or Paris EQ's. I'm just letting other know who may be wondering. >>>>> >>>>>Also, if you want a cool core dump in XP, start a render and then hit >>>>>CTRL-ALT-DEL and kill Paris. My mistake, I was closing paris and didn't >>>>>realize the render was still going and it stopped responding. Ka blamo! >>>>> >>>>>John >>>> >>>> >>i got a cardboard cat called "flat cat" at a yard sale....it's Much easier to deal with....lol and it's been with me now for over 15 yrs.....<b
t; > your > >>>>Paris SPDIF out with a short cable. Go back to the Patch Bay. >>>> >>>>In the Patch Bay, connect the "Mixer Insert" SEND of the source channel > > >
ketchy pinning down which one, but on my system I = have to=20 use card A and C and skip putting a MEC on card B or wierd stuff like = this=20 happens (another hidden Paris 'feature'). The other thing to check is = that=20 you have a good wordclock BNC cable running from MEC #1 to MEC #2. AA "Deadmeat" <scott@postmodernblues.com> wrote in message=20 news:43a59445$1@linux... > > Hi all - > Been messing with V3 for a bit and noticed a real problem. > Testing on a 3-card system, 2 MECs installed (on A and B > cards), 2 ADAT and one Sync on MEC A, 1 8-input on MEC B. > > Can record fine with MIX A, MEC A. Getting no sound at all > on any inputs for MEC B, Mix B. Tried to load V2.2, and all > is fine - can record on MEC B inputs all day long. When using > V3, see input lights on module, but have no meters in mixer > and no sound - MEC B syncing to WC fine - plays sound accross > all submixes just fine from projects recorded on V2. > >
Any Thoughts?=20 ------=_NextPart_000_003D_01C60408.A1C72430 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dead, What Aaron says is true. When my = system was=20 three cards with two Mecs I had card A and C attached to the = Mecs. Now=20 with five cards it's A and E. My ASUS boards like the first and last card when using two Mecs.
cyL/AHdnRQfVsVyVG2ux3Rp00rog1HTf [binary]
mUpDMqqsg [binary]
ja91ewVIre0T [binary]
r /> [binary]
PpltE [binary]
1y9/tS0tI4hZXLFbhPLUbzCq4JTk [binary]<b
DJXP8Qx2 [binary]
Biy7nYep8wHJHqK+ [binary]
n54rRmu4 [binary]
ZVPkzEcM [binary]
t;Dead, >>What Aaron says is true. When my system was three cards with two Mecs >>I had card A and C attached to the Mecs. Now with five cards it's A and > = >>E. =20 >>My ASUS boards like the first and last card when using two Mecs. >>Tom >> "Aaron Allen" <nospam@not_here.dude> wrote in message = >>news:43a5b0b4$1@linux... >> Are you sure you have the two 'correct' EDS cards chosen for your = >>system? I=20 >> know that it gets sketchy pinning down which one, but on my system I = >>have to=20 >> use card A and C and skip putting a MEC on card B or wierd stuff like > = >>this=20 >> happens (another hidden Paris 'feature'). The other thing to check is > = >>that=20 >> you have a good wordclock BNC cable running from MEC #1 to MEC #2. >> >> AA >> >> >> "Deadmeat&quot
t;> > Testing on a 3-card system, 2 MECs installed (on A and B > >> > cards), 2 ADAT and one Sync on MEC A, 1 8-input on MEC B. > >> > > >> > Can record fine with MIX A, MEC A. Getting no sound at all > >> > on any inputs for MEC B, Mix B. Tried to load V2.2, and all > >> > is fine - can record on MEC B inputs all day long. When using > >> > V3, see input lights on module, but have no meters in mixer > >> > and no sound - MEC B syncing to WC fine - plays sound accross > >> > all submixes just fine from projects recorded on V2. > >> > > >> > Any Thoughts?=20 > >> > >> > >> > >><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"&
gt; > >> > >> >>charset=3Diso-8859-1"> > >> > >> > >> > >&g
t; > >> Dead, > >> What Aaron says is true. When my = > >>system was=20 > >>three cards with two Mecs > >> I had card A and C attached to the = > >>Mecs. Now=20 > >>with five cards it's A and E. > >> My ASUS boards like >>face=3DArial=20 > >>size=3D2>the first and last card when using two Mecs. > >> Tom > >><BLOCKQUOTE=20 > >>style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; = > >>BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"> > >> "Aaron Allen" <<A=20 > >> href=3D"mailto:nospam@not_here.dude">nospam@not_here.dude> = > >>wrote in=20 > >> message >>href=3D"news:43a5b0b4$<
;BR><A=20 > >> = > >>href=3D"news:43a59445$1@linux">news:43a59445$1@linux... > &g= > >>t; Hi=20 > >> all - > Been messing with V3 for a bit and noticed a real=20 > >> problem. > Testing on a 3-card system, 2 MECs installed (on A = > >>and=20 > >> B > cards), 2 ADAT and one Sync on MEC A, 1 8-input on MEC=20 > >> B. > > Can record fine with MIX A, MEC A. Getting no sound = > >>at=20 > >> all > on any inputs for MEC B, Mix B. Tried to load V2.2, and=20 > >> all > is fine - can record on MEC B inputs all day long. When=20 > >> using > V3, see input lights on module, but have no meters in=20 > >> mixer > and no sound - MEC B syncing to WC fine - plays sound=20 > >> accross > all submixes just fine from projects recorded on=20 > >> V2. > > Any Thoughts? > >> > >> > > > >.......can you say Taliban? In a way, I think this stuff may be the beginning of the end for the Iranian regime. there's an educated population there and this kind of repression might just backfire on a n