YGJ87+ewxweBnvUIlijV9s [binary] ---=_linux43441b88--That looks like the drummer in my old band. ;o) "mike claytor" <claytor@nospam.com> wrote in message news:43441b8a@linux... > > mah screech owl kin kick your screech owl's ass. > > ;0) > > > "DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote: > >Here's the little bugger. > > > >Screech owl. > > > > > > > >"DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote in message > >news:43431a4d@linux... > >> http://raysweb.net/specialplaces/pages/owl.html > >> > >> This looks like th guy. Amy managed to wrap it up in a towel and get it > >out > >> to the back yard. > >> > >> Man, these thngs can haul ass. > >> > >> "uptown jimmy" <johnson314@bellsouth.net> wrote in message > >> news:434319a3$1@linux... > >> > Pictures, dammit! > >> > > >> > WTF is a burrowing owl? > >> > > >> > Jimmy > >> > > >> > "DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote in message > >> > news:43431966@linux... > >> > > We've got one here. Looks like a little burrowing owl. It appears > that > >> the > >> > > cat grabbed it and ran into the house with it and it turned around > and > >> > > kicked kitty's ass. > >> > > > >> > > Doesn't appear to be any worse for the wear and is quite agile and > >> > > acrobatic.. Now if we could just persuade it to go outside. > >> > > > >> > > ;o) > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > >This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ---=_linux43441d30 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Oooops! Sorry for the humungous pic! Here 'tis only smaller. Looks like a Tolkien character. ---=_linux43441d30 Content-Type: image/jpeg; name="Baby-Screech-Owl.jpg" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="Baby-Screech-Owl.jpg" [binary] IgACEQEDEQH/xACBAAADAQEBAQEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAQIDBAUGBwEBAQEBAAAA [binary] ---=_linux43441d30--DAMN!!!!!....dude!!!!!....that's one scary lookin' critter. Looks like he got attacked by a Norelco triple head electric shaver. I'd be pissed too. ;o) "James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:434419f6@linux... > > I'll put this Killer Cat up against your Owl! > > > > "He's got big fangs!" (Monty Python) > > > "DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote: > >We've got one here. Looks like a little burrowing owl. It appears that the > >cat grabbed it and ran into the house with it and it turned around and > >kicked kitty's ass. > > > >Doesn't appear to be any worse for the wear and is quite agile and > >acrobatic.. Now if we could just persuade it to go outside. > > > >;o) > > > > > > >I was gonna ask if you could post something just a little bigger next time. ;oP "mike claytor" <claytor@nospam.com> wrote in message news:43441d30$1@linux... > > Oooops! > > Sorry for the humungous pic! > > Here 'tis only smaller. > > Looks like a Tolkien character."Wow man! That thing's huge!" "Do you think it'll fit on the album cover?" Cheech and Chong "DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote: >I was gonna ask if you could post something just a little bigger next time. > >;oP > >"mike claytor" <claytor@nospam.com> wrote in message >news:43441d30$1@linux... >> >> Oooops! >> >> Sorry for the humungous pic! >> >> Here 'tis only smaller. >> >> Looks like a Tolkien character. > >I knew a fellow who bred those cats. They're called Sphinx cats. They had about 12 of them running around the place, plus a couple Devon Rex kitties which they bred back into the Sphinx line in order to broaden the gene pool a bit. The hairless (Sphinx) and under-coating-only cats (Devon Rex and Cornish Rex) are some of the coolest cats you'll ever meet. I'm particularly fond of the Devons, whose fur is like rippled mink. They are exteremely intelligent (refreshing in a cat), they love water, and are amongst the most social of animals, very bright, lovely personalities. And they have huge ears. I've enclosed a photo of a Devon. BTW, that owl with the pin-feathers still on? Adorable. "DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote in message news:43441dc0@linux... > DAMN!!!!!....dude!!!!!....that's one scary lookin' critter. Looks like he > got attacked by a Norelco triple head electric shaver. I'd be pissed too. > > ;o) > > > "James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:434419f6@linux... > > > > I'll put this Killer Cat up against your Owl! > > > > > > > > "He's got big fangs!" (Monty Python) > > > > > > "DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote: > > >We've got one here. Looks like a little burrowing owl. It appears that > the > > >cat grabbed it and ran into the house with it and it turned around and > > >kicked kitty's ass. > > > > > >Doesn't appear to be any worse for the wear and is quite agile and > > >acrobatic.. Now if we could just persuade it to go outside. > > > > > >;o) > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sorry, but that cat looks like Meg Ryan after a severe bout of anorexia. ;oP "uptown jimmy" <johnson314@bellsouth.net> wrote in message news:43442236@linux... > I knew a fellow who bred those cats. They're called Sphinx cats. They had > about 12 of them running around the place, plus a couple Devon Rex kitties > which they bred back into the Sphinx line in order to broaden the gene pool > a bit. > > The hairless (Sphinx) and under-coating-only cats (Devon Rex and Cornish > Rex) are some of the coolest cats you'll ever meet. I'm particularly fond of > the Devons, whose fur is like rippled mink. They are exteremely intelligent > (refreshing in a cat), they love water, and are amongst the most social of > animals, very bright, lovely personalities. And they have huge ears. > > I've enclosed a photo of a Devon. > > BTW, that owl with the pin-feathers still on? Adorable. > > > "DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote in message > news:43441dc0@linux... > > DAMN!!!!!....dude!!!!!....that's one scary lookin' critter. Looks like he > > got attacked by a Norelco triple head electric shaver. I'd be pissed too. > > > > ;o) > > > > > > "James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote in message > > news:434419f6@linux... > > > > > > I'll put this Killer Cat up against your Owl! > > > > > > > > > > > > "He's got big fangs!" (Monty Python) > > > > > > > > > "DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote: > > > >We've got one here. Looks like a little burrowing owl. It appears that > > the > > > >cat grabbed it and ran into the house with it and it turned around and > > > >kicked kitty's ass. > > > > > > > >Doesn't appear to be any worse for the wear and is quite agile and > > > >acrobatic.. Now if we could just persuade it to go outside. > > > > > > > >;o) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Hey Deej, I was speaking with Morgan about mic's and he mentioned that you have both the Mojave and Se Gemini. What are your impressions? Thanks! TyroneIt looks like any other cat, only without the outer layer of hair. It's the outer hair that makes cats look fluffy and hefty. Anybody who has seen a cat wet knows what I'm talking about. Except most wet cats don't look as cheerful as that Devon Rex... Jimmy "DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote in message news:43442605@linux... > Sorry, but that cat looks like Meg Ryan after a severe bout of anorexia. > > ;oP > > "uptown jimmy" <johnson314@bellsouth.net> wrote in message > news:43442236@linux... > > I knew a fellow who bred those cats. They're called Sphinx cats. They had > > about 12 of them running around the place, plus a couple Devon Rex kitties > > which they bred back into the Sphinx line in order to broaden the gene > pool > > a bit. > > > > The hairless (Sphinx) and under-coating-only cats (Devon Rex and Cornish > > Rex) are some of the coolest cats you'll ever meet. I'm particularly fond > of > > the Devons, whose fur is like rippled mink. They are exteremely > intelligent > > (refreshing in a cat), they love water, and are amongst the most social of > > animals, very bright, lovely personalities. And they have huge ears. > > > > I've enclosed a photo of a Devon. > > > > BTW, that owl with the pin-feathers still on? Adorable. > > > > > > "DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote in message > > news:43441dc0@linux... > > > DAMN!!!!!....dude!!!!!....that's one scary lookin' critter. Looks like > he > > > got attacked by a Norelco triple head electric shaver. I'd be pissed > too. > > > > > > ;o) > > > > > > > > > "James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote in message > > > news:434419f6@linux... > > > > > > > > I'll put this Killer Cat up against your Owl! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "He's got big fangs!" (Monty Python) > > > > > > > > > > > > "DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote: > > > > >We've got one here. Looks like a little burrowing owl. It appears > that > > > the > > > > >cat grabbed it and ran into the house with it and it turned around > and > > > > >kicked kitty's ass. > > > > > > > > > >Doesn't appear to be any worse for the wear and is quite agile and > > > > >acrobatic.. Now if we could just persuade it to go outside. > > > > > > > > > >;o) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Sort of. There's actually no such thing as "Logical partitions". There are extended partitions which can contain any number of logical drives, hence you can get around the limitation by having a single extended partition containing 8 logical drives, and that partition will then give you 8 drives. It's more difficult to boot to a Logical Drive though. You actually don't have to hide the other partitions though either, so long as you only have 4 partitions showing in total. You can if you want, but you have the option of having up to 4 Primary or 3 primary and one extended (containing logical drives) showing on any given boot. This is how I understand it anyhow. I could be wrong as I haven't quite got it to work as I want yet, but this seems to be what I was seeing in the menus, and it does make some sense that just because you have an Extended Boot Manager, that Windows may still only be able to see a limited number of partitions. Cheers, Kim. "erlilo" <erlilo@online.no> wrote: >OK, i got it. Let me see, there's only one primary partition that can be set >active with WinXP at once, so you shouldn't see any other primary partitions >at all, the three others can then be logical partitions, just for working >stuff like PAF's, waves, etc etc. When changing over to another active, >primary WinXP, you should allways see the three, same logical partitions for >working materials. So logically, you can have "oceans" of primary partitions >hided, just to be called up with the manager when using Bootit's own system. >But you can only see the active WinXP partition and three logical partitions >at once. That's my understanding but I'm just thinking high here without any >knowings.... > >Erling > > >"Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> skrev i melding news:4343acb9$1@linux... >> >> >> That is correct, but if you choose the BootIt 255 partition system, you >> then >> must choose which of those 255 partitions you can see for WinXP. You >> cannot >> use FDISK, but even when you use BootIT to do your partitions, it doesn't >> solve the fact that Windows is only programmed for having 4 partitions. >> Yes, >> you can HAVE lots of partitions, but you can't SEE them all at once. You >> can only see 4 from Windows. Hence you have to tell BootIT which 4 >> partitions >> you want to see depending upon which OS you are booting. >> >> Cheers, >> Kim. >> >> "erlilo" <erlilo@online.no> wrote: >>>If I have understand the manual correct, you have 2 choices when starting >> >>>Bootit up the first time, using the compatible with Microsoft's Fdisk >>>system, that's only giving 4 partitions on a harddisk, or using Bootit's >> own >>>system with up to 255 partitions on one harddisk. I don't know if this is >> >>>correct at all after reading this. >>>Cheers >>>Erling >>> >>>"Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> skrev i melding news:434308e5$1@linux... >>>> >>>> One other thing I've noticed is that it seems while you can have up to >> 255 >>>> primary partitions on a drive, you can only actually see 4 at any one >> time >>>> from any given OS, because WinXP refuses to see more than 4. I beleive >> >>>> I've >>>> pretty much sussed how to deal with all that side of things though. > >>>> Cheers, >>>> Kim. >>> >>> >> > >2 MEC's, 2 EDS1000's , Windows XP. When playing recordings back in Paris, i'm getting what seems like the obvious word clock pops *ONLY IN THE MASTER SECTION* this is strange to me. I tried switching out the word clock cable between MEC chassis, problem persists. I even moved the word clock cable between the EDS cards to the other port. Any ideas? PS: I just got an Apogee Rosetta 800 on loan for a couple of weeks for another project (on another system), i even tried spitting Clock from that box into the rig and (while it sounded great) it still does it, however less frequently. I'm simply chaining clock signal from box to box by doing it this way, so i'm not sure if this is even going to make a difference without getting a distro box.Well......hmmmmm. I don't own and have little experience with the U47. I've used one a couple of times. I though it was very flattering to to male,/female vocals and bass cab/upright which were the only things I have ever used it on. About 4 years ago, Mike Claytor read the TapeOp article by David Royer and put one of these mics together. I ended up with it on a loan and used it on a female vocalist in a demo session. On her voice, it had that same rich velvety vibe that I remembered about the U47. I have used it on male vocalists as well. I liked it so much that I bought another one that Mike made. These mics are point-to-point wired through perfboard with Peluso capsules so this may set them apart from the Mojave mics which are most likely designed around prefab PCB's like the later Royer kits. I also don't know anything about the capsules that Mojave is using. I will say that the original Marshallcapsules that were used in my mics sounded excellent. The Peluso capsules have a bit more detail to my ears. This is slight, but audible in the *car key* test. The Mojave has very good mid and HF handling characteristics and is very flattering to the human voice with a very warm bottom which is, inthe case of my mics, probably due to the Jensen transformers. The SE Gemini sounds similar in some ways. The bottom sounds different from the Mojave, probably due to the fact that there is a tube at the output stage rather than a transformer. I haven't played around with this as much as I intend to, but I can envision a bit of variety by switching tubes. The Gemini has a bit more output gain than my Mojaves, but the self noise is just a low (both are very well behaved for tube mics). The Gemini has *lots* of low level detail. If expression is what you're looking for, you're going to get it in spades with the Gemini. I heard an interview with Allison Krause's engineer once describing the way he used a Sony C800G on her voice and how this picked up every nuance. The Gemini has this kind of low level detail. The C800G is a $5k microphone. At first I was a bit put off by the Gemini because it's so heavy. You need a moose of a mic stand to support it. I use a big Atlas boom. If you decide on one of these make sure you've got the infrasturcture to use it. I love them both. They have both done justice to vocals and instruments (the Gemini can be an awesome guitar mic when placed about 2' from the guitar due to it's high output and detail-the Mojave usually gets the nod on upright bass) If I want to get the *breathy thing* going with a femme vocalist, I reach for the Gemini. Since the Gemini covers about 95% of what the Movaje does tonally, it might be a more versatile piece, especially since the tubes can be swapped out to taste. Both of these smoke my Stephen Paul U87 for vocal tracking. It's hard to admit it, but I just keep the Stephen Paul mic around here these days to impress people. It's a beautiful and very *true* sounding mic and it still gets used a lot on instrumental dubs but it seldom gets the nod on a vocal session after a singer has heard their voice on the Gemini or Mojave. Also, I'd say that though the Gemini is manufactured in Shanghai, don't let that worry you at all. This thing is beyond the Studio Projects offerings. SE doesn't appear to be trying to make *cheap mics* It looks and sounds like a quality piece. I can't really speak for the new Mojave's that are also being manufactured in China, but if they are anything like my hand made mics, they are wonderful. It's really hard to believe that mics this good can be had for $1000.00. Deej "Tyrone Corbett" <tyronecorbett@comcast.net> wrote in message news:4344265d$1@linux... > > Hey Deej, I was speaking with Morgan about mic's and he mentioned that you > have both the Mojave and Se Gemini. What are your impressions? > > Thanks! > > Tyrone "Thought of a place for The Paris Diner-Greys Papaya 72 and Amsterdam-$1.00 hot dogs-Pina Coladda drinks- JMI just looked at mine. It was one of the first made. I don't see any foam. Is that something they added to later versions of the mic? David On 4-Oct-2005, "Neil" <OIUOIU@OIU.com> wrote: > IMO, the best mod for a 4033 is to rip the foam out of the > birdcage.I have a project coming in that was recorded in Paris 2.2 on a Win XP machine. I run Paris 3.0 on a G4 Mac. If he brings me a firewire drive w/ his project on it will my machine "see" it? If not what do we need to do to make this happen? Thanks! GanttOw! Thanks for the warning! Gantt Matt wrote: > in article 4342fc5d$1@linux, Eugene B at martinlancer@hotmail.com wrote on > 10/4/05 3:04 PM: > > > > > Any mac users using uad 3.9 with paris 3.0? > > I'm using uad 3.41 but don't want to run into > > unexpeced problems as i am just finishing up > > a 12 song project in paris. > > 3.9 worked for me until I tried to render to disk with fx, then it crash my > system every time. I'm using 3.7 with out any problems."cujo" <chris@applemanstudio.com> wrote: > >Does this cause to much top end? Ot is it smooth and open? Nah, it's just more detailed/clear, IMO. NeilDJ, do you know if Mike C will do these mods for anyone else? I'd like to mod a PPA 2ube for a lower noise floor and slightly smoother presence. "DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote: >Well......hmmmmm. I don't own and have little experience with the U47. I've >used one a couple of times. I though it was very flattering to to >male,/female vocals and bass cab/upright which were the only things I have >ever used it on. > >About 4 years ago, Mike Claytor read the TapeOp article by David Royer and >put one of these mics together. I ended up with it on a loan and used it on >a female vocalist in a demo session. On her voice, it had that same rich >velvety vibe that I remembered about the U47. I have used it on male >vocalists as well. I liked it so much that I bought another one that Mike >made. These mics are point-to-point wired through perfboard with Peluso >capsules so this may set them apart from the Mojave mics which are most >likely designed around prefab PCB's like the later Royer kits. I also don't >know anything about the capsules that Mojave is using. I will say that the >original Marshallcapsules that were used in my mics sounded excellent. The >Peluso capsules have a bit more detail to my ears. This is slight, but >audible in the *car key* test. The Mojave has very good mid and HF handling >characteristics and is very flattering to the human voice with a very warm >bottom which is, inthe case of my mics, probably due to the Jensen >transformers. > >The SE Gemini sounds similar in some ways. The bottom sounds different from >the Mojave, probably due to the fact that there is a tube at the output >stage rather than a transformer. I haven't played around with this as much >as I intend to, but I can envision a bit of variety by switching tubes. The >Gemini has a bit more output gain than my Mojaves, but the self noise is >just a low (both are very well behaved for tube mics). The Gemini has *lots* >of low level detail. If expression is what you're looking for, you're going >to get it in spades with the Gemini. > >I heard an interview with Allison Krause's engineer once describing the way >he used a Sony C800G on her voice and how this picked up every nuance. The >Gemini has this kind of low level detail. The C800G is a $5k microphone. At >first I was a bit put off by the Gemini because it's so heavy. You need a >moose of a mic stand to support it. I use a big Atlas boom. If you decide on >one of these make sure you've got the infrasturcture to use it. > >I love them both. They have both done justice to vocals and instruments (the >Gemini can be an awesome guitar mic when placed about 2' from the guitar due >to it's high output and detail-the Mojave usually gets the nod on upright >bass) If I want to get the *breathy thing* going with a femme vocalist, I >reach for the Gemini. Since the Gemini covers about 95% of what the