Let's face it, US public schools system has been failing since the 70's.
>>You are correct about putting 2 of the 8-input cards in 1 mec and the >>>>>other in the second mec. Actually, to get 24-input, you only need one >>>>>8-input card in each mec since you have the 4-inputs of the mec >>&
Arrrrggghhh!!!!! I posted the wrong link!!!
gt;>>already available. In other words, you have 12-inputs per mec/eds. >>>>> >>>>>- Paul >>> > http://blog.mlive.com/annarbornews/2007/09/dingell_global_wa rming_may_req.html This is the biggest load of disingenuous hubris I've seen in a while. More hypocracy. Whether you get it or not, your intelligence has just been insulted and be assured that what this is really all about it preparing you to be bent over as consumption falls. Expect more of this BS as gas usage goes down a
Re: Let's face it, US public schools system has been failing sincethe 70's.
nsider this a sin. The women are not supposed to cut their hair, and they must cover their legs, etc. Their minister worship, which is man worship, not God worship fringes on being a Christian cult. The women are so brainwashed by their ministers that they will do almost ANYTHING their ministers tell them to do. In other words, they worship and follow what man tells them to do, not what the bible says, which is the word of God. They are vary controlled. They are a vary strange bunch. There are Christian extremist that pervert the teachings of the bible and give Christians a bad name. The media loves to exploit the radical Christians like the ones that dance around with rattle snakes in order to make Christians look bad. They wan
Re: Let's face it, US public schools system has been failing since the 70's.
ace >> >>>or make war, that have really been colored by good or bad leaders. For me, >> >>>the old Bible is just a historical "cooking book" with recipes of ways to >> >>>live, after someone seeing and learning about good and bad ways to live, >> >>>told from mouth to mouth by good people up against thousand of years >>>before >> >>>someone could written the words down, with all that colorations the words >> >>>ha
Re: Let's face it, US public schools system has been failing since
ng are just the >>>words >> >>>for this kind of doings. We are just giving our sivilization into the >>>hands >> >>>of our childrens future with the ways we're living the day. >>> >>>There have allways been good and bad sivilizations, that could live in >>>pe
>>> >>>>>>>>> Bill L <bill@billlorentzen.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> All people are basically good and are trying to survive as they >>>>>>>>>> understand it. With that starting point you can understand and >>>>>>>>>> help >>>>> >>>>>>>>>> others. All people are basically good. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> erlilo wrote: >>>>>>>>> Most of the difference and >>>>>>>>>>&
of that. >> >> >Has anyone here modified one of these. Any suggestions.sounds great as is. no need to change it. I have the C3 and my friend has the C1. Mines the same as C1 with more patterns. Awesome mic.I can pick out these ass clowns a mile away. They always sound like they know what they are talking about and then you listen to the actual words and they are full of shit. Great politicians.Al Gore has a $2500 per month e
lto:chris@applemanstudio.com" target="_blank">chris@applemanstudio.com> wrote: > > >I was thinking of a Peluso Cap for mine too..or else if someone wants it >I'd be willing to let it go for the right price..I just never use it now. > >"John" <no@no.com> wrote: >> >>I can't ! wow >> >>"Morgan" <morganp@ntplx.net> wrote: >>>Hi Jim - Yes , >>> >>>We actually have one here that was modded by Mike Claytor. He put a tube >>in >>>it , sounds warmer and Brighter >>>if you can imagine that ? >>>Mike had a parts list on this
way back when - if this feeble mind can recall >> >>>, somewhere about 2002 ? >>>I could be off a decade or so ~ time really flies around here :) >>> >>>Morgan >>>Eastcoast Music Mall >>> >>>"jim drago" <jamesd@prospect.k12.or.us> wrote in message >>>news:47e2eb0f$1@linux... >>>> >>>> Has anyone here modified one of these. Any suggestions. >>> >>> >> >send it to me. I can't believe you think it's "strident". Open, natural top end yes, strident no. Maybe you just like something with less highs.Try a Peluso CK-67 capsule if you'd like to do something like that... I've had that capsule in a mic before & it sounded nice. Neil &qu
ot;Rod Lincoln" <rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com> wrote: > >I don't use mine anymore either. It's to strident (I guess that means bright >in a not good way) for me. I might be into doing a mod to a different capsule. >Rod >"Cujo" <chris@applemanstudio.com> wrote: >> >> >>I was thinking of a Peluso Cap for mine too..or else if someone wants it >>I'd be willing to let it go for the right price..I just never use it now. >> >>"John" <no@no.com> wrote: >>> >>>I can't ! wow >>> >>>"Morgan" <morganp@ntplx.net> wrote: >>>>Hi Jim - Yes , >>>> >>>>We actually have one here that was modded by Mike Claytor. He put a tube >>>in >>>>it , sounds warmer and Brighter >>>>if you can imagine that ? >>>>Mike had a parts list on this way back when - if this feeble mind can >recall >>> >>>>, somewhere about 2002 ? >>>>I could be off a decade or so ~ time really flies around
with sooner than >later. > >When a Michigan congressman who is one of the main defenders of the auto >industry in Washington starts talking plainly about the ramifications of >human contributions to greenhouse gases, that's news. > >It's not enough to merely tar him as a Democrat. This is the guy who >held up updating CAFE. He has not been shy about representing the auto >industry. > >Cheers, > -Jamie > www.JamieKrutz.com > > Old thinking new thinking. He is just getting onboard with the new tax plan. He just telling us to all get ready to bend over! > >James McCloskey wrote: >> This is what i've been saying. When Al Gore buys global offsets for ten cents >> and sells them for a dollar, it's a big bunch of money making bullshit! >> Now this trilateralist bureaucrat bunch of SOBs are going to try to make >> it a sin tax that we will all have to pay. You know once the government >> gets a tax passed through they will never repeal it. We will be paying it >> for then on! It's a scare tactic to cow the people in to believing this >> bunch of bullshit. There is no significant man made global warming, it's >> a lie to shift the wealth out of the United States while these rats and their >> friends get wealthy doing it. >> >> >> >> "Mr. Simplicity" <noway@jose.net> wrote: >>> http://blog.mlive.com/annarbornews/2007/09/dingell_global_wa rming_may_req.html >>> >>> This is the biggest load of disingenuous hubris I've seen in a while. More >> >>> hypocracy. Whether you get it or not, your intelligence has just been >>> insulted and be assured that what this is really all about it preparing >> you >>> to be bent over as consumption falls. Expect more of this BS as gas usage >> >>> goes down and therefore the tax revenue that a gallon of gas generates is >> >>> proportionately reduced. To make up for the revenue shortfall, we're going >> >>> to get taxed into oblivion........and I was even sorta' thinking about >>> voting for a Democrat for president. The new forumla for the American >>> economy is to tax businesses more so that they will continue to go elsewhere >> >>> while screwing the workers who will be losing their jobs. >>> >>> Gimme some of that. >>> >>> >>You can be truly free in Americ
a. You can choose to farm the land, depend on no one and pay no (income) tax. In many rural areas of the country you can pay no or nominal property taxes. It is entirely possible. This utopian freedom has bounds: At some point you may get sick. Chuck "John" <no@no.com> wrote: > >For me the Dream has always been true freedom, quality health care, food, >shelter, minimal government, clean air and neighbors who actually care about >each other. Money is just the gambit that has been used to leverage our >day to day needs and make us all slaves. Like the bullshit energy crisis. > Where are the "new" ideas to decouple us from oil.....fucking nowhere. >This government is horseshit.Bill Conners wasn't as fast and flashy as Al but he was (and probably still is) a great guitarist. "Mark McDermott" <mark.nospam@stateofwail.com> wrote: > >Alright, in my senseless teenage giddyness I did say the "original" members >and that was totally incorrect! > >Being a guitarist of 37+ years, I only got into RTF when Al joined the band. > >I apologize for my error. Also, alert the media as I have now made my first >mistake. ;)Maybe he's not recording Shania Twain retreads hahahahhahaha Chuck "John" <no@no.com> wrote: > >send it to me. I can't believe you think it's "strident". Open, natural >top end yes, strident no. Maybe you just like something with less highs.I liked some of Al's solo stuff, but goo
icka-thumpity-whacka" palm muting on EVERY song, willya? lol Neil "Gantt Kushner" <ganttmann@comcast.net> wrote: > >Bill Conners wasn't as fast and flashy as Al but he was (and probably still >is) a great guitarist. > >"Mark McDermott" &lt
>>Being a guitarist of 37+ years, I only got into RTF when Al joined the band. >> >>I apologize for my error. Also, alert the media as I have now made my first >>mistake. ;) >testYou sound a little boomy. Just go again for me. "jeremy luzier" <none@comcast.net> wrote: >test > >I would be happy living in a tent, with something like a Neve 88-RS inside and drum room and some iso booths. <br /
> ;o) "erlilo" <erlingl@tdcadsl.dk> wrote in message news:47e2f00c@linux... > He, he, I must smile a little....isn't it these things that' is allways > called "The American Dream"? Just to be rich in money? I don't know if > it's true but I have read much about this dream up against the years, but > didn't know someone American hated that dream;-) > > erlilo > > "John" <no@no.com> skrev i en meddelelse news:47e2ed48$1@linux... >> >> Al Gore has a $2500 per month electric bill. He can go fuck himself. >> >>
John Edwards who preaches about how he cares about the poor has a 28,000 >> sq foot house. He can go fuck himself. >> >> Tiger Woods just bought a 65 million dollar house. He can go fuck >> himself. >> These people have WAY too much and never seem to get any humulity. Fuck >> em all. Hypocritical assholes. >> >> Still waiting on Hillary's tax returns for last year. > >That's ISO tents to you, Mr Green Jeans. AA "Mr. Simplicity" <noway@jose.net> wrote in message news:47e3533a@linux... >I would be happy living in a tent, with something like a Neve 88-RS inside >and drum room and some iso booths. > > ;o) > > "erlilo" <erlingl@tdcadsl.dk> wrote in message news:47e2f00c@linux... >> He, he, I must smile a little....isn't it these things that' is allways >> called "The American Dream"? Just to be rich in money? I don't know if >> it's true but I have read much about this dream up against the years, but >> didn't know someone American hated that dream;-) >> >> erlilo >> >> "John" <no@no.com> skrev i en meddelelse news:47e2ed48$1@linux... >>> >>> Al Gore has a $2500 per month electric bill. He can go fuck himself. >>> >>> John Edwards who preaches about how he cares about the poor has a 28,000 >>> sq foot house. He can go fuck himself. >>> >>> Tiger Woods just bought a 65 million dollar house. He can go fuck >>> himself. >>> These people have WAY too much and never seem to get any humulity. >>>
er. >> >>Happy Easter all, >>Dedric >> >> >>On 3/20/08 8:03 AM, in article 47e27184@linux, "Bill L" >><bill@billlorentzen.com> wrote: >> >>> Personally, repeat *personally*, I think some creepy, disgusting Dark >>> Ages priests said "all are lost and doomed by their sins". That is their >>> control mechanism: "Do what we say or burn forever in Hell. Only I know >>> the truth." Personally, I think that kind of coercion is disgusting. >>> >>> I prefer to believe Jesus was full of love and trust and belief in the >>> goodness of man. >>> >>> >>> DC wrote: >>>> Sorry, I misread your question. >>>> >>>> Jesus taught that all are lost and all are doomed by their >>>> sins. He never ever said people are basically good and >>>> this position is against everything he stood and died for. >>>> >>>> We can pursue this further if you like, but it is very clear. >>>> >>>> DC >Check it out for yourself. There's even a picture! http://ldolphin.org/babel.htmlIt should work out. Sarah is good! Ping Sarah Tonin "Gregb" <funkykeys1@verizon.net> wrote in message news:47e00445$1@linux... > > I bought an EDS card off Ebay from her (paid with Paypal) and haven't > heard > a word from her in 2 weeks. No emails, no item in the mail, nothing. > Anyone?? > > Thanks! GregIsn't this cute? http://markhumphrys.com/left.islamic.html This one is the kicker though, and elucidates my periodic rants better than I do: http://dineshdsouza.com/books/enemy-intro.html Our economy is gonna bounce along the bottom for a while. This wasn't necessary. Now I hear the Democrats starting to harp on the economy and tie it ti Iraq. there is, most definitely, a connection. http://drsanity.blogspot.com/2007/04/selfless-narcissism.htm l and the following excerpt is something I've been ranting about here and elsewhere for years: The Democrats and their glorious leaders, who have become so narcissistically invested in this country's defeat as a political strategy to accumulate power and "restore American honor", that they have--wittingly or unwittingly--decided to sell their countrymen out to the very enemy they are currently fighting. They mean well, of course. They do it for those wonderful 'selfless' reasons--like "peace" and "social justice" and all. They really support the troops . Let's just ignore the fact that they bear considerable responsibility for the ongoing violence and death of our troops as they enable and encourage the priorities of the enemy. Why should the terrorists alter their homicidal behavior? It is working! People like Nancy Pelosi are living proof of the effectiveness of their strategy. There really is a problem. It's a problem that has been aggravated and encouraged by the left in this country..........you know, the ones who don't quite understand that they will be the first to be slaughtered once they have thrown a wrench in the gears of those who are willing to protect them. They just do not get it. The Islamists parrot the leftist American Imperialist tripe that the leftists love to hear and ascribe to this country but the Islamists do it by design, to dupe the left into helping them destroy the protectors of the culture that the left hopes to protect by trying to appease
those who will not be appeased until the leftists are either dead or are kneeling toward Mecca. Once it is too late, they can then whine about how pissed off they are that there's no separation between mosque and state...right before they are separated from their heads. I recognized it years ago. So did lots of other people.....funny, I didn't hear a peep out of OBama though. OK......now I'm of to rape the land. bye.I've heard two separate commentaries (one a major news agency, the other a Brit's personal rant) about how the UK is catering to the whims of Islam - they've restricted the use of the Three Little Pigs story in some schools. England is funding Islamic schools for their Muslim citizens. They are considering passing Islamic laws in some areas to appease that community (these were echoed in both, separate and independent commentaries - two completely different viewpoints seeing the same thing happen). In effect, the UK is making concessions right and left and getting nothing in return - just more demands. Forget their own history, people and culture, just give up in the face of fear of suicide bombers, sarin gas, and extremist protests. The news agency report basically said exactly what you are DJ - the US is doing the same thing - bowing down and letting our "pacifist" leftwing veil of "peace" and "equality" and "justice" dupe us into giving up those very ideals, playing right into the hands of extremism and even terrorism. That's the paradox that's become our country. And this is just one case of how the left is ironically proposing and touting exactly the opposite of what is the fabric of our country. DT On 3/21/08 7:49 AM, in article <a h
ref="mailto:47e3bffd@linux" target="_blank">47e3bffd@linux, "Mr. Simplicity" <noway@jose.net> wrote: > Isn't this cute? > http://markhumphrys.com/left.islamic.html > > > This one is the kicker though, and elucidates my periodic rants better than > I do: > http://dineshdsouza.com/books/enemy-intro.html > > Our economy is gonna bounce along the bottom for a while. This wasn't > necessary. Now I hear the Democrats starting to harp on the economy and tie > it ti Iraq. there is, most definitely, a connection. > > http://drsanity.blogspot.com/2007/04/selfless-narcissism.htm l > > and the following excerpt is something I've been ranting about here and > elsewhere for years: > The Democrats and their glorious leaders, who have become so > narcissistically invested in this country's defeat as a political strategy > to accumulate power and "restore American honor", that they have--wittingly > or unwittingly--decided to sell their countrymen out to the very enemy they > are currently fighting. They mean well, of course. They do it for those > wonderful 'selfless' reasons--like "peace" and "social justice" and all. > They really support the troops . > > Let's just ignore the fact that they bear considerable responsibility for > the ongoing violence and death of our troops as they enable and encourage > the priorities of the enemy. Why should the terrorists alter their homicidal > behavior? It is working! People like Nancy Pelosi are living proof of the > effectiveness of their strategy. > > There really is a problem. It's a problem that has been aggravated and > encouraged by the left in this country..........you know, the ones who > don't quite understand that they will be the first to be slaughtered once > they have thrown a wrench in the gears of those who are willing to protect > them. They just do not get it. The Islamists parrot the leftist American > Imperialist tripe that the leftists love to hear and ascribe to this country > but the Islamists do it by design, to dupe the left into helping them > destroy the protectors of the culture that the left hopes to protect by > trying to appease those who will not be appeased until the leftists are > either dead or are kneeling toward Mecca. Once it is too late, they can then > whine about how pissed off they are that there's no separation between > mosque and state...right before they are separated from their heads. I > recognized it years ago. So did lots of other people.....funny, I didn't > hear a peep out of OBama though. > > OK......now I'm of to rape the land. > > bye. > > > >If LE came with an audio interface, it's likely 1, 2 or possibly v3. v1 is far outdated now. v2 isn't bad, but since Cubase is on v4, it might be worth upgrading. 1 - you can use multiple monitors easily - we do it all the time. You have to manually resize the main project window to stretch across both monitors (not maximize - that uses the main monitor only, as do almost all Windows apps, unfortunately). Then resize the individual arrange, mixer, etc windows as you wish within that layout. Save your workspaces (you can have up to 9 on key commands) assign them to key commands, and work away. 2 - You can easily remove unused tracks from the pool window. Unlike Paris, you can't hang yourself with file references - you can delete, bounce, etc, without worrying about losing the perfect take (if you try to erase a file from the pool, Cubase will tell you if there is a reference to it in the arrange window - if not, it's gone, if there is, you can choose). 3 - Cubase and Nuendo 4's VST3 plugins really are pretty decent. I use mostly 3rd party plugins, as I would with any DAW, but the new EQ is just as good as Paris' with imho, wasn't anything special - just a digital EQ. Chorus? The new v4 chorus is better, but I prefer UAD-1's DM-1 or other options there. Paris was a mono app, so all of it's plugins had to convert mono to stereo (working with stereo tracks was a major pain). With Cubase, just create a stereo FX channel or group, put your chorus there, and route the mono track to it - simple - mono to stereo. You can then also use it for other tracks if you want. 4 - I don't miss Paris. Nuendo (and Cubase, esp. v4) is far faster and 100x more flexible for pretty much everything. Give the manual a read and dive in a bit before passing judgement. Paris was cool for the time, but it was surpassed in many areas years ago (jails was cool, but other than that, there isn't anything I would want from it now). Reg
ar 2008 00:03:59 +1000, "Steve Cox" <stevec1@charter.net> wrote: > >Don't know what books you are reading but the tower of babel isn't about different >gods. It was about the power of agreement. All those people were in agreement >to build a tower that would reach Heaven. Wasn't Gods plan for getting to >Heaven. So He had to do something to break their wrong motives and broke >their native tongue up into different languages so that they couldn't understand >each other and the tower stopped. So when you hear about someone who is just >"babelling" on about something, you'll know where the term came from. Babelling >never makes any sense does it? But don't take my word for it... Take His. >Check out the Word. > >rick <parnell68@hotmail.com> wrote: >>the tower of babel wasn't about different languages it's about >>different ideas of god. we can all agree that a tree is a tree no >>matter in what language but god and salvation is quite a different >>animal. >> >>On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 09:15:58 -0600, Dedric Terry <dterry@keyofd.net> >>wrote: >> >>>I'll only post this in response to your two posts since this topic is not >>>only off topic, but also unpopular: >>> >>>Actually the Bible says Romans 3:22-24 "22 This righteousness from God >comes >>>through faith in Jesus Christ to all who believe. There is no difference, >23 >>>for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, 24 and are justified >>>freely by his grace through the redemption that came by Christ Jesus." >>> >>>Some use "turn or burn" tactics, but I don't agree with that approach. > At >>>the same time, the "do whatever feels right to you" mentality is also >>>fatally flawed. Between those two is where Jesus taught - we aren't >>>perfect, and will never be on our own (anyone that disagrees, please attempt >>>to g
o a whole day without making a mistake of any kind, whether in action, >>>how you talk to someone else, or how you think ;-). Only through God's >>>grace and by his love can be be perfected in Him - not perfect humans, >but >>>loved perfectly (i.e. beyond what we practice and understand in human love) >>> >>>The point of the above passage, and the idea that we have all sinned is >that >>>we can't receive God's grace and forgiveness, and become "righteous" in >His >>>sight by our own power, deeds or merit. It isn't a scare tactic even though >>>it has been used that way. >>> >>>We have to accept and believe that Jesus, not only loves us, but also took >>>the burden of our own sin upon himself by dying on the cross and being >>>raised from the dead to reunite with His Father - this became the symbol >of >>>what "being saved" is all about - allowing old ways to die, and a new life >>>to begin, not just living a good life. This is how the concept of being >>>sinners really becomes a beautiful thing - we aren't doomed to pay for >our >>>mistakes forever. There is hope. We also can't keep making the same >>>mistakes without consequences, whether earthly or heavenly (the former >is >>>common sense - keep hitting your thumb with a hammer, eventually you'll >>>break it ;-). >>> >>>In practice the change is real, and the heart does take on a new perspective >>>on our own lives, responsibilities, people around us, etc. We don't stop >>>making mistakes (but that's what forgiveness is for - not excuses, but >>>second chances), and we don't become perfect humans, but now we have hope >>>beyond what the world has to offer. >>> >>>Happy Easter all, >>>Dedric >>> >>> >>>On 3/20/08 8:03 AM, in article 47e27184@linux, "Bill L" >>><bill@billlorentzen.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Personally, repeat *personally*, I think some creepy, disgusting Dark >>>> Ages priests said "all are lost and doomed by their sins". That is their >>>> control mechanism: "Do what we say or burn forever in Hell. Only I know >>>> the truth." Personally, I think that kind of coercion is disgusting. >>>> >>>> I prefer to believe Jesus was full of love and trust and belief in the >>>> goodness of man. >>>> >>>> >>>> DC wrote: >>>>> Sorry, I misread your question. >>>>> >>>>> Jesus taught that all are lost and all are doomed by their >>>>> sins. He never ever said people are basically good and >>>>> this position is against everything he stood and died for. >>>>> >>>>> We can pursue this further if you like, but it is very clear. >>>>> >>>>> DC >>http://my.break.com/Content/view.aspx?ContentID=473507 Y'all remember that screaming german kid on his computer; the one with glasses and having a spaz attack. Well it been translated and now you know the rest of the story. El MiguelThat's not the same Sarah, is it? Neil "Miguel Vigil" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote: >It should work out. Sarah is good! > >Ping Sarah Tonin > > >"Gregb" <funkykeys1@verizon.net> wrote in message news:47e00445$1@linux... >> >> I bought an EDS card off Ebay from her (paid with Paypal) and haven't >> heard >> a word from her in 2 weeks. No emails, no item in the mail, nothing. >> Anyone?? >> >> Thanks! Greg > >And, Ed... with regard to your not liking the plugins that come with Cubase, go to the KVR website: http://www.kvraudio.com/ ....and search their database for free VST plugins of whatever variety you need (dynamics, eq, etc, etc), and you will find bazillions of 'em. Voxengo also has a few free ones, so does Silverspike (Room Machine 844 is a good free one from them), and Kjaerhus has a complete suite
(their "Classic" series) which are free, as well. Here's another big batch of free ones, most of which are pretty basic, but again, it's some more variety, at least: http://www.gvst.co.uk/effects.htm Those'll get you started on some other decent plugins that you won't have to invest anything in... I have plenty of ones I've paid for, but I also use a few of the freebie ones out there, too. Neil Dedric Terry <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote: >If LE came with an audio interface, it's likely 1, 2 or possibly v3. v1 is >far outdated now. v2 isn't bad, but since Cubase is on v4, it might be >worth upgrading. > >1 - you can use multiple monitors easily - we do it all the time. You have >to manually resize the main project window to stretch across both monitors >(not maximize - that uses the main monitor only, as do almost all Windows >apps, unfortunately). Then resize the individual arrange, mixer, etc >windows as you wish within that layout. Save your workspaces (you can have >up to 9 on key commands) assign them to key commands, and work away. > >2 - You can easily remove unused tracks from the pool window. Unlike Paris, >you can't hang yourself with file references - you can delete, bounce, etc, >without worrying about losing the perfect take (if you try to erase a file >from the pool, Cubase will tell you if there is a reference to it in the >arrange window - if not, it's gone, if there is, you can choose). > >3 - Cubase and Nuendo 4's VST3 plugins really are pretty decent. I use >mostly 3rd party plugins, as I would with any DAW, but the new EQ is just as >good as Paris' with imho, wasn't anything special - just a digital EQ. >Chorus? The new v4 chorus is better, but I prefer UAD-1's DM-1 or other >options there. Paris was a mono app, so all of it's plugins had to convert >mono to stereo (working with stereo tracks was a major pain). With Cubase, >just create a stereo FX channel or group, put your chorus there, and route >the mono track to it - simple - mono to stereo. You can then also use it >for other tracks if you want. > >4 - I don't miss Paris. Nuendo (and Cubase, esp. v4) is far faster and 100x >more flexible for pretty much everything. Give the manual a read and dive >in a bit before passing judgement. Paris was cool for the time, but it was >surpassed in many areas years ago (jails was cool, but other than that, >there isn't anything I would want from it now). > >Regards, >Dedric > >On 3/21/08 7:12 AM, in article 47e3a616$1@linux, "Ed" <askme@email.com> >wrote: > >> >> Ummm.. not sure. Whatever the latest Cubase LE is... cause it came with a >> device that is brand new. I am positive it isn't an older copy. But >> really... >> I don't think that matters too much. I would like to find a tracking program >> for my firewire device that is closer to Paris. Is there anything out there >> like that? Or, what are some others using that they like besides Cubase? >> >> Oh! and since I don't know what version of Cubase LE I have (I don't have >> the disc here or the program), I did try the demo of Cubase 4 before this... >> and they looked identical... if that helps... >> >> >> Bill L <bill@billlorentzen.com> wrote: >>> What version of LE is it? >>> >>> Ed wrote: >>>> Hey guys (and gals)... I have setup my new firewire studio and I been >> tracking >>>> in Cubase LE that came with the program. Although the sonics seems ok >> and >>>> maybe it's just because I am new to Cubase... but is there something better >>>> out there for tracking that resembles Paris? I have dual monitors and >> there >>>> is no way to make use of this in Cubase... It creates a new version of >> the >>>> track each time.. but unlike Paris, if I delete, I mean delete... don't >>>> make me close the program so I have to clean up all those monster files... >>>> hopefully someone understands what I mean here... And the plugins that >>>> came with Cubase are... ummm... can you spell TERRIBLE! I tried to adjust >>>> the ones that I played with and I must say... WHAT were they thinking! >> They >>>> need lessons with plugins from Paris. An example is the chorus... I >> apply >>>> that to a track and sheesh... why waste my time. I max'd the thing out... >>>> not much of a difference. Is there plugins that go from mono to stereo, >>>> like in Paris.. or is that just a Paris plugin thingy? >>>> >>>> I like the fact that Cubase LE is free with my device... but I am hopeful >>>> that there is something else out there that operates similar to Paris... >>>> Anyone? >>>> >> >not our sarah...can't see her ever doing that...too much class that girl. On 22 Mar 2008 01:47:43 +1000, "Neil" <OIUOIU@OIU.com> wrote: > >That's not the same Sarah, is it? > >Neil > > >"Miguel Vigil" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote: >>It should work out. Sarah is good! >> >>Ping Sarah Tonin >> >> >>"Gregb" <funkykeys1@verizon.net> wrote in message news:47e00445$1@linux... >>> >>> I bought an EDS card off Ebay from her (paid with Paypal) and haven't > >>> heard >>> a word from her in 2 weeks. No emails, no item in the mail, nothing. >>> Anyone?? >>> >>> Thanks! Greg >> >>again, i know the story is about language, confusion and other bright ideas men come up with. sorry, but i have a problem with "men" had o
ne language thing. just as i have a problem with god being suprised that adam and eve would partake of the forbidden fruit when told no no no you don't. he's god...for his sakes... guess he also didn't think of incest when populating the earth from just one pair of peeps. i mean cain went to the land of nod and eventually married...who...i don't know...mom...sis...cousin rita??? i believe god was smart enough to create the laws of physics that allow certain things to happen under certain conditions and lets the chips fall where they may. to me god doesn't kill 250 people on a plane and spare one as a lesson of his devine intervention capabilities. he doesn't kill half a town yet spares a church so they have somewhere to mourn the dead. the truely (again to me) sad thing about the differing concepts of god is how their used to validate the harm we do each other. On 22 Mar 2008 00:13:36 +1000, "Steve Cox" <stevec1@charter.net> wrote: >http://ldolphin.org/babel.htmlRick, there's some good insights here. How God works is not always transparent to us. What concerns me is the reality of Jesus. From that issue flow all others, and whether there is an objective truth here or we are free to make it up as we go along. DC rick <parnell68@hotmail.com> wrote: >again, i know the story is about language, confusion and other bright >ideas men come up with. >sorry, but i have a problem with "men" had one language thing. just >as i have a problem with god being suprised that adam and eve would >partake of the forbidden fruit when told no no no you don't. he's >god...for his sakes... guess he also didn't think of incest when >populating the earth from just one pair of peeps. i mean cain went to >the land of nod and eventually married...who...i don't >know...mom...sis...cousin rita??? >i believe god was smart enough to create the laws of physics that >allow certain things
to happen under certain conditions and lets the >chips fall where they may. to me god doesn't kill 250 people on a >plane and spare one as a lesson of his devine intervention >capabilities. he doesn't kill half a town yet spares a church so they >have somewhere to mourn the dead. >the truely (again to me) sad thing about the differing concepts of god >is how their used to validate the harm we do each other. > > >On 22 Mar 2008 00:13:36 +1000, "Steve Cox" <stevec1@charter.net> >wrote: > >>http://ldolphin.org/babel.html >The fabric of are nation? What is that? Salvery? segragation? racisim? the KKK? self-righteousness! Dedric Terry <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote: >I've heard two separate commentaries (one a major news agency, the other a >Brit's personal rant) about how the UK is catering to the whims of Islam - >they've restricted the use of the Three Little Pigs story in some schools. >England is funding Islamic schools for their Muslim citizens. They are >considering passing Islamic laws in some areas to appease that community >(these were echoed in both, separate and independent commentaries - two >completely different viewpoints seeing the same thing happen). In effect, >the UK is making concessions right and left and getting nothing in return - >just more demands. Forget their own history, people and culture, just give >up in the face of fear of suicide bombers, sarin gas, and extremist >protests. > >The news agency report basically said exactly what you are DJ - the US is >doing the same thing - bowing down and letting our "pacifist" leftwing veil >of "peace" and "equality" and "justice" dupe us into giving up those very >ideals, playing right into the hands of extremism and even terrorism. >That's the paradox that's become our country. And this is just one case of >how the left is ironically proposing and touting exactly the opposite of >what is the fabric of our country. > >DT > >On 3/21/08 7:49 AM, in article 47e3bffd@linux, "Mr. Simplicity" ><noway@jose.net> wrote: > >> Isn't t
began. it is in my nature to question what i see and hear and if i go to hell for it...then oh well it's who i am, the way i was made. > >DC > > > >rick <parnell68@hotmail.com> wrote: >>again, i know the story is about language, confusion and other bright >>ideas men come up with. >>sorry, but i have a problem with "men" had one language thing. just >>as i have a problem with god being suprised that adam and eve would >>partake of the forbidden fruit when told no no no you don't. he's >>god...for his sakes... guess he also didn't think of incest when >>populating the earth from just one pair of peeps. i mean cain went to >>the land of nod and eventually married...who...i don't >>know...mom...sis...cousin rita??? >>i believe god was smart enough to create the laws of physics that >>allow certain things to happen under certain conditions and lets the >>chips fall where they may. to me god doesn't kill 250 people on a >>plane and spare one as a lesson of his devine intervention >>capabilities. he doesn't kill half a town yet spares a church so they >>have somewhere to mourn the dead. >>the truely (again to me) sad thing about the differing concepts of god >>is how their used to validate the harm we do each other. >> >> >>On 22 Mar 2008 00:13:36 +1000, "Steve Cox" <stevec1@charter.net> >>wrote: >> >>>http://ldolphin.org/babel.html >>"YAH" <bla-bla@yah.com> wrote in message news:47e3dde1$1@linux... > > The fabric of are nation? What is that? Salvery? segragation? racisim? > the > KKK? > self-righteousness! > Dear YAH, Perhaps you take a bit less amphetamine?It's taking personal responsibility for your own integrity, and posting your real name. lol. "YAH" <bla-bla@yah.com> wrote in message news:47e3dde1$1@linux... > > The fabric of are nation? What is that? Salvery? segragation? racisim? > the > KKK? > self-righteousness! > > > Dedric Terry <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote: >>I've heard two separate commentaries (one a major news agency, the other > a >>Brit's personal rant) about how the UK is catering to the whims of Islam > - >>they've restricted the use of the Three Little Pigs story in some schools. >>England is funding Islamic schools for their Muslim citizens. They are >>considering passing Islamic laws in some areas to
appease that community >>(these were echoed in both, separate and independent commentaries - two >>completely different viewpoints seeing the same thing happen). In effect, >>the UK is making concessions right and left and getting nothing in return > - >>just more demands. Forget their own history, people and culture, just >>give >>up in the face of fear of suicide bombers, sarin gas, and extremist >>protests. >> >>The news agency report basically said exactly what you are DJ - the US is >>doing the same thing - bowing down and letting our "pacifist" leftwing >>veil >>of "peace" and "equality" and "justice" dupe us into giving up those very >>ideals, playing right into the hands of extremism and even terrorism. >>That's the paradox that's become our country. And this is just one case > of >>how the left is ironically proposing and touting exactly the opposite of >>what is the fabric of our country. >> >>DT >> >>On 3/21/08 7:49 AM, in article 47e3bffd@linux, "Mr. Simplicity" >><noway@jose.net> wrote: >> >>> Isn't this cute? >>> http://markhumphrys.com/left.islamic.html >>> >>> >>> This one is the kicker though, and elucidates my periodic rants better > than >>> I do: >>> http://dineshdsouza.com/books/enemy-intro.html >>> >>> Our economy is gonna bounce along the bottom for a while. This wasn't >>> necessary. Now I hear the Democrats starting to harp on the economy and > tie >>> it ti Iraq. there is, most definitely, a connection. >>> >>> http://drsanity.blogspot.com/2007/04/selfless-narcissism.htm l >>> >>> and the following excerpt is something I've been ranting about here and >>> elsewhere for years: >>> The Democrats and their glorious leaders, who have become so >>> narcissistically invested in this country's defeat as a political >>> strategy >>> to accumulate power and "restore American honor", that they >>> have--wittingly >>> or unwittingly--decided to sell their countrymen out to the very enemy > they >>> are currently fighting. They mean well, of course. They do it for those >>> wonderful 'selfless' reasons--like "peace" and "social justice" and all. >>> They really support the troops . >>> >>> Let's just ignore the fact that they bear considerable responsibility > for >>> the ongoing violence and death of our troops as they enable and >>> encourage >>> the priorities of the enemy. Why should the terrorists alter their >>> homicidal >>> behavior? It is working! People like Nancy Pelosi are living proof of > the >>> effectiveness of their strategy. >>> >>> There really is a problem. It's a problem that has been aggravated and >>> encouraged by the left in this country..........you know, the ones who >>> don't quite understand that they will be the first to be slaughtered >>> once<
br /> >>> they have thrown a wrench in the gears of those who are willing to >>> protect >>> them. They just do not get it. The Islamists parrot the leftist American >>> Imperialist tripe that the leftists love to hear and ascribe to this >>> country >>> but the Islamists do it by design, to dupe the left into helping them >>> destroy the protectors of the culture that the left hopes to protect by >>> trying to appease those who will not be appeased until the leftists are >>> either dead or are kneeling toward Mecca. Once it is too late, they can > then >>> whine about how pissed off they are that there's no separation between >>> mosque and state...right before they are separated from their heads. I >>> recognized it years ago. So did lots of other people.....funny, I didn't >>> hear a peep out of OBama though. >>> >>> OK......now I'm of to rape the land. >>> >>> bye. >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >And, btw - I can't believe anyone would even dare to post such racist propaganda as this (and that's exactly what it is) when the original post was on radical islam, not slavery. Simply amazing. This forum really has lost it. I'm out. I've really had enough of these far fetched bizarre reactions and detours into left field. "YAH" <bla-bla@yah.com> wrote in message news:47e3dde1$1@linux... > > The fabric of are nation? What is that? Salvery? segragation? racisim? > the > KKK? > self-righteousness! > > > Dedric Terry <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote: >>I've heard two separate commentaries (one a major news agency, the other > a >>Brit's personal rant) about how the UK is catering to the whims of Islam > - >>they've restricted the use of the Three Little Pigs story in some schools. >>England is funding Islamic schools for their Muslim citizens. They are >>considering passing Islamic laws in some areas to appease that community >>(these were echoed in both, separate and independent commentaries - two >>completely different viewpoints seeing the same thing happen). In effect, >>the UK is making concessions right and left and getting nothing in return > - >>just more demands. Forget their own history, people and culture, just >>give >>up in the face of fear of suicide bombers, sarin gas, and extremist >>protests. >> >>The news agency report basically said exactly what you are DJ - the US is >>doing the same thing - bowing down and letting our "pacifist" leftwing >>veil >>of "peace" and "equality" and "justice" dupe us into giving up those very >>ideals, playing right into the hands of extremism and even terrorism. >>That's the paradox that's become our country. And this is just one case > of >>how the left is ironically proposing and touting exactly the opposite of >>what is the fabric of our country. >> >>DT >> >>On 3/21/08 7:49 AM, in article 47e3bffd@linux, "Mr. Simplicity" >><noway@jose.net> wrote: >> >>> Isn't this cute? >>> http://markhumphrys.com/left.islamic.html >>> >>> >>> This one is the kicker though, and elucidates my periodic rants better > than >>> I do: >>> http://dineshdsouza.com/books/enemy-intro.html >>> >>> Our economy is gonna bounce along the bottom for a while. This wasn't >>> necessary. Now I hear the Democrats starting to harp on the economy and > tie >>> it ti Iraq. there is, most definitely, a connection. >>> >>> http://drsanity.blogspot.com/2007/04/selfless-narcissism.htm l >>> >>> and the following excerpt is something I've been ranting about here and >>> elsewhere for years: >>> The Democrats and their glorious leaders, who have become so >>> narcissistically invested in this country's defeat as a political >>> strategy >>> to accumulate power and "restore American honor", that they >>> have--wittingly >>> or unwittingly--decided to sell their countrymen out to the very enemy > they >>> are currently fighting. They mean well, of course. They do it for those >>> wonderful 'selfless' reasons--like "peace" and &quot
;social justice" and all. >>> They really support the troops . >>> >>> Let's just ignore the fact that they bear considerable responsibility > for >>> the ongoing violence and death of our troops as they enable and >>> encourage >>> the priorities of the enemy. Why should the terrorists alter their >>> homicidal >>> behavior? It is working! People like Nancy Pelosi are living proof of > the >>> effectiveness of their strategy. >>> >>> There really is a problem. It's a problem that has been aggravated and >>> encouraged by the left in this country..........you know, the ones who >>> don't quite understand that they will be the first to be slaughtered >>> once >>> they have thrown a wrench in the gears of those who are willing to >>> protect >>> them. They just do not get it. The Islamists parrot the leftist American >>> Imperialist tripe that the leftists love to hear and ascribe to this >>> country >>> but the Islamists do it by design, to dupe the left into helping them >>> destroy the protectors of the culture that the left hopes to protect by >>> trying to appease those who will not be appeased until the leftists are >>> either dead or are kneeling toward Mecca. Once it is too late, they can > then >>> whine about how pissed off they are that there's no separation between >>> mosque and state...right before they are separated from their heads. I >>> recognized it years ago. So did lots of other people.....funny, I didn't >>> hear a peep out of OBama though. >>> >>> OK......now I'm of to rape the land. >>> >>> bye. >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >I initially thought the same thing... but emails are different. I did a search on the site for Sarah Thompson's email address and nothing came up as far as past posts. I've submitted for conflict resolution at Paypal/Ebay but honestly don't except much success. I've gone down that route before with no results. It's a buyer beware world! "Miguel Vigil" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote: >It should work out. Sarah is good! > >Ping Sarah Tonin > > >"Gregb" <funkykeys1@verizon.net> wrote in message news:47e00445$1@linux... >> >> I bought an EDS card off Ebay from her (paid with Paypal) and haven't >> heard >> a word from her in 2 weeks. No emails, no item in the mail, nothing. >> Anyone?? >> >> Thanks! Greg > >The humanity is facing it's biggest disaster in 100 000 years. Tax raises won't solve anything, it demand a lot more action than that.. BR "James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:47e2cfc2$1@linux... > > This is what i've been saying. When Al Gore buys global offsets for ten cents > and sells them for a dollar, it's a big bunch of money making bullshit! > Now this trilateralist bureaucrat bunch of SOBs are going to try to make > it a sin tax that we will all have to pay. You know once the government > gets a tax passed through they will never repeal it. We will be paying it > for then on! It's a scare tactic to cow the people in to believing this > bunch of bullshit. There is no significant man made global warming, it's > a lie to shift the wealth out of the United States while these rats and their > friends get wealthy doing it. > > > > "Mr. Simplicity" <noway@jose.net> wrote: > > http://blog.mlive.com/annarbornews/2007/09/dingell_global_wa rming_may_req.h tml > > > >This is the biggest load of disingenuous hu
w forumla for the American > >economy is to tax businesses more so that they will continue to go elsewhere > > >while screwing the workers who will be losing their jobs. > > > >Gimme some of that. > > > > >http://apnews.excite.com/article/20080321/D8VHSS681.html "James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote: > >I think it's time to boycott China and their products, there is no sense in >supporting this government in any way. > >http://apnews.excite.com/article/20080316/D8VELU0G0.html > >http://apnews.excite.com/article/20080316/D8VEM3KG0.htmlHey folks, A friend is looking for a laptop for audio use. Anyone have a current Dell or other laptop that is good for audio they would recommend? Looking to get XP on it, and have friendly firewire for a TC Konnekt 24D. Budget around $1k, but could go a few hundred more. Also, how are you guys handling internal & external laptop drives? Firewire? USB? E-Sata? Thanks! Grahamrick <parnell68@hotmail.com> wrote: >again, i know the story is about language, confusion and other bright >ideas men come up with. >sorry, but i have a problem with "men" had one language thing. just >as i have a problem with god being suprised that adam and eve would >partake of the forbidden fruit when told no no no you don't. he's >god...for his sakes... guess he also didn't think of incest when >populating the earth from just one pair of peeps. i mean cain went to >the land of nod and eventually married...who...i don't >know...mom...sis...cousin rita??? >i believe god was smart enough to create the laws of physics that >allow certain things to happen under certain conditions and lets the >chips fall where they may. to me god doesn't kill 250 people on a >plane and spare one as a lesson of his devine intervention >capabilities. he doesn't kill half a town yet spares a church so they >have somewhere to mourn the dead. >the truely (again to me) sad thing about the differing concepts of god >is how their used to validate the harm we do each other. > > God did not just create Adam and Eve, they were just the first people created. >On 22 Mar 2008 00:13:36 +1000, "Steve Cox" <stevec1@charter.net> >wrote: > >>http://ldolphin.org/babel.html >The main reason I asked is because one of mine is needing repaired and I got it at a very good price. Since it needs repaired anyhow I though I would see about modding it. I love the sound of them, but thought I'd ask. Jim "Neil" <OIOI@OI.com> wrote: > >Try a Peluso CK-67 capsule if you'd like to do something like >that... I've had that capsule in a mic before & it sounded nice. > > >Neil > > >"Rod Lincoln" <rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com> wrote: >> >>I don't use mine anymore either. It's to strident (I guess that means bright >>in a not good way) for me. I might be into doing a mod to a different capsule. >>Rod >>"Cujo" <chris@applemanstudio.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>>I was thinking of a Peluso Cap for mine too..or else if someone wants it >>>I'd be willing to let it go for the right price..I just never use it now. >>> >>>"John" <no@no.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>I can't ! wow >>>> >>>>"Morgan" <morganp@ntplx.net> wrote: >>>>>Hi Jim - Yes , >>>>> >>>>>We actually have one here that was modded by Mike Claytor. He put a tube >>>>in >>>>>it , sounds warmer and Brighter >>>>>if you can imagine that ? >>>>>Mike had a parts list on this way back when - if this feeble mind can >>recall >>>> >>>>>, somewhere about 2002 ? >>>>>I could be off a decade or so ~ time really flies around here :) >>>>> >>>>>Morgan >>>>>Eastcoast Music Mall >>>>> >>>>>"jim drago" <jamesd@prospect.k12.or.us> wrote in message >>>>>news:47e2eb0f$1@linux... >>>>>> >>>>>> Has anyone here modified one of these. Any suggestions. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >Some in our country have a built in excuse. Whenever they don't get their way, when ever they are caught red handed, whenever they need an excuse or a reason for what they did, they play the race card. The race card is there answer to everything. "Dedric Terry" <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote: >And, btw - I can't believe anyone would even dare to post such racist >propaganda as this >(and that's exactly what it is) when the original post was on radical islam, >not slavery. Simply amazing. > >This forum really has lost it. I'm out. I've really had enough of these >far fetched bizarre reactions and detours into left field. > >"YAH" <bla-bla@yah.com> wrote in message news:47e3dde1$1@linux... >> >> The fabric of are nation? What is that? Salvery? segragation? racisim? >> the >> KKK? >> self-righteousness! >> >> >> Dedric Terry <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote: >>>I've heard two separate commentaries (one a major news agency, the other >> a >>>Brit's personal rant) about how the UK is catering to the whims of Islam >> - >>>they've restricted the use of the Three Little Pigs story in some schools. >>>England is funding Islamic schools for their Muslim citizens. They are >>>considering passing Islamic laws in some areas to appease that community >>>(these were echoed in both, separate and independent commentaries - two >>>completely different viewpoints seeing the same thing happen). In effect, >>>the UK is making concessions right and left and getting nothing in return >> - >>>just
more demands. Forget their own history, people and culture, just >>>give >>>up in the face of fear of suicide bombers, sarin gas, and extremist >>>protests. >>> >>>The news agency report basically said exactly what you are DJ - the US is >>>doing the same thing - bowing down and letting our "pacifist" leftwing >>>veil >>>of "peace" and "equality" and "justice" dupe us into giving up those very >>>ideals, playing right into the hands of extremism and even terrorism. >>>That's the paradox that's become our country. And this is just one case >> of >>>how the left is ironically proposing and touting exactly the opposite of >>>what is the fabric of our country. >>> >>>DT >>> >>>On 3/21/08 7:49 AM, in article 47e3bffd@linux, "Mr. Simplicity" >>><noway@jose.net> wrote: >>> >>>> Isn't this cute? >>>> http://markhumphrys.com/left.islamic.html >>>> >>>> >>>> This one is the kicker though, and elucidates my periodic rants better >> than >>>> I do: >>>> http://dineshdsouza.com/books/enemy-intro.html >>>> >>>> Our economy is gonna bounce along the bottom for a while. This wasn't >>>> necessary. Now I hear the Democrats starting to harp on the economy and >> tie >>>> it ti Iraq. there is, most definitely, a connection. >>>> >>>> http://drsanity.blogspot.com/2007/04/selfless-narcissism.htm l >>>> >>>> and the following excerpt is something I've been ranting about here and >>>> elsewhere for years: >>>> The Democrats and their glorious leaders, who have become so >>>> narcissistically invested in this country's defeat as a political >>>> strategy >>>> to accumulate power and "restore American honor", that they >>>> have--wittingly >>>> or unwittingly--decided to sell their countrymen out to the very enemy >> they >>>> are currently fighting. They mean well, of course. They do it for those >>>> wonderful 'selfless' reasons--like "peace" and "social justice" and all. >>>> They really support the troops . >>>> >>>> Let's just ignore the fact that they bear considerable responsibility >> for >>>> the ongoing violence and death of our troops as they enable and >>>> encourage >>>> the priorities of the enemy. Why should the terrorists alter their >>>> homicidal >>>> behavior? It is working! People like Nancy Pelosi are living proof of >> the >>>> effectiveness of their strategy. >>>> >>>> There really is a problem. It's a problem that has been aggravated and >>>> encouraged by the left in this country..........you know, the ones who >>>> don't quite understand that they will be the first to be slaughtered >>>> once >>>> they have thrown a wrench in the gears of those who are willing to >>>> protect >>>> them. They just do not get it. The Islamists parrot the leftist American >>>> Imperialist tripe that the leftists love to hear and ascribe to this >>>> country >>>> but the Islamists do it by design, to dupe the left into helping them >>>> destroy the protectors of the culture that the left hopes to protect by >>>> trying to appease those who will not be appeased until the leftists are >>>> either dead or are kneeling toward Mecca. Once it is too late, they can >> then >>>> whine about how pissed off they are that there's no separation between >>>> mosque and state...right before they are separated from their heads. I >>>> recognized it years ago. So did lots of other people.....funny, I didn't >>>> hear a peep out of OBama though. >>>> >>>> OK......now I'm of to rape the land. >>>> >>>> bye. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >He should have got a Mac; ) "Miguel Vigil" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote: >http://my.break.com/Content/view.aspx?ContentID=473507 > > >Y'all remember that screaming german kid on his computer; the one with >glasses and having a spaz attack. > > > >Well it been translated and now you know the rest of the story. > > > >El Miguel > >What we need is waders and a big shovel to get rid of this load of crap. "BR" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote: >The humanity is facing it's biggest disaster in 100 000 years. Tax raises >won't solve anything, it demand a lot more action than that.. >BR > >"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote in message >news:47e2cfc2$1@linux... >> >> This is what i've been saying. When Al Gore buys global offsets for ten >cents >> and sells them for a dollar, it's a big bunch of money making bullshit! >> Now this trilateralist bureaucrat bunch of SOBs are go
tml >> > >> >This is the biggest load of disingenuous hubris I've seen in a while. >More >> >> >hypocracy. Whether you get it or not, your intelligence has just been >> >insulted and be assured that what this is really all about it preparing >> you >> >to be bent over as consumption falls. Expect more of this BS as gas usage >> >> >goes down and therefore the tax revenue that a gallon of gas generates is >> >> >proportionately reduced. To make up for the revenue shortfall, we're >going >> >> >to get taxed into oblivion........and I was even sorta' thinking about >> >voting for a Democrat for president. The new forumla for the American >> >economy is to tax businesses more so that they will continue to go >elsewhere >> >> >while screwing the workers who will be losing their jobs. >> > >> >Gimme some of that. >> > >> > >> > >Listen, My comments are not about the article,I'm not defending the left. I just find the statement "the fabric of are country" to be bullshit. We forget about are past and pass judgement on others. This is the self-righteousness I speak of. As to why I do not post my name? Because of the self-righteousness I speak of. Wake up! Clean up your backyard. Playing the race card? It could'nt be played if racism was'nt true and alive today! You may look at my comments as detour into left field,but my comments are directed at your comment about the "fabric" of are country. The truth is almost all the founding fathers were slave owners,and some only freed their slaves after they died. Now there is one thing I agree on with you is that this place has gone way down! "Dedric Terry" <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote: >And, btw - I can't believe anyone would even dare to post such racist >propaganda as this >(and that's exactly what it is) when the original post was on radical islam, >not slavery. Simply amazing. > >This forum really has lost it. I'm out. I've really had enough of these >far fetched bizarre reactions and detours into left field. > >"YAH" <bla-bla@yah.com> wrote in message news:47e3dde1$1@linux... >> >> The fabric of are nation? What is that? Salvery? segragation? racisim? >> the >> KKK? >> self-righteousness! >> >> >> Dedric Terry <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote: >>>I've heard two separate commentaries (one a major news agency, the other >> a >>>Brit's personal rant) about how the UK is catering to the whims of Islam >> - >>>they've restricted the use of the Three Little Pigs story in some schools. >>>England is funding Islamic schools for their Muslim citizens. They are >>>considering passing Islamic laws in some areas to appease that community >>>(these were echoed in both, separate and independent commentaries - two >>>completely different viewpoints seeing the same thing happen). In effect, >>>the UK is making concessions right and left and getting nothing in return >> - >>>just more demands. Forget their own history, people and culture, just >>>give >>>up in the face of fear of suicide bombers, sarin gas, and extremist >>>protests. >>> >>>The news agency report basically said exactly what you are DJ - the US is >>>doing the same thing - bowing down and letting our "pacifist" leftwing >>>veil >>>of "peace" and "equality" and "justice" dupe us into giving up those very >>>ideals, playing right into the hands of extremism and even terrorism. >>>That's the paradox that's become our country. And this is just one case >> of >>>how the left is ironically proposing and touting exactly the opposite of >>>what is the fabric of our country. >>> >>>DT >>> >>>On 3/21/08 7:49 AM, in article 47e3bffd@linux, "Mr. Simplicity" >>><noway@jose.net> wrote: >>> >>>> Isn't this cute? >>>> http://markhumphrys.com/left.islamic.html >>>> >>>> >>>> This one is the kicker though, and elucidates my periodic rants better >> than >>>> I do: >>>> http://dineshdsouza.com/books/enemy-intro.html >>>> >>>> Our economy is gonna bounce along the bottom for a while. This wasn't >>>> necessary. Now I hear the Democrats starting to harp on the economy and >> tie >>>> it ti Iraq. there is, most definitely, a connection. >>>> >>>> http://drsanity.blogspot.com/2007/04/selfless-narcissism.htm l >>>> >>>> and the following excerpt is something I've been ranting about here and >>>> elsewhere for years: >>>> The Democrats and their glorious leaders, who have become so >>>> narcissistically invested in this country's defeat as a political >>>> strategy >>>> to accumulate power and "restore American honor", that they >>>> have--wittingly >>>> or unwittingly--decided to sell their countrymen out to the very enemy >> they >>>> are currently fighting. They mean well, of course. They do it for those >>>> wonderful 'selfless' reasons--like "peace" and "social justice" and all. >>>> They really support the troops . >>>> >>>> Let's just ignore the fact that they bear considerable responsibility >> for >>>> the ongoing violence and death of our troops as they enable and >>>> encourage >>>> the priorities of the enemy. Why should the terrorists alter their >>>> homicidal >>>> behavior? It is working! People like Nancy Pelosi are living proof of >> the >>>> effectiveness of their strategy. >>>> >>>> There really is a problem. It's a problem that has been aggravated and >>>> encouraged by the left in this country..........you know, the ones who >>>> don't quite understand that they will be the first to be slaughtered >>>> once >>>> they have thrown a wrench in the gears of those who are willing to >>>> protect >>>> them. They just do not get it. The Islamists parrot the leftist American >>>> Imperialist tripe that the leftists love to hear and ascribe to this >>>> country >>>> but the Islamists do it by design, to dupe the left into helping them >>>> destroy the protectors of the culture that the left hopes to protect by >>>> trying to appease those who will not be appeased until the leftists are >>>> either dead or are kneeling toward Mecca. Once it is too late, they can >> then >>>> whine about how pissed off they are that there's no separation between >>>> mosque and state...right before they are separated from their heads. I >>>> recognized it years ago. So did lots of other people.....funny, I didn't >>>> hear a peep out of OBama though. >>>> >>>> OK......now I'm of to rape the land. >>>> >>>> bye. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >You tried Reaper yet? "Ed" <askme@email.com> wrote in message news:47e3a616$1@linux... > > Ummm.. not sure. Whatever the latest Cubase LE is... cause it came with a > device that is brand new. I am positive it isn't an older copy. But > really... > I don't think that matters too much. I would like to find a tracking > program > for my firewire device that is closer to Paris. Is there anything out > there > like that? Or, what are some others using that they like besides Cubase? > > Oh! and since I don't know what version of Cubase LE I have (I don't have > the disc here or the program), I did try the demo of Cubase 4 before > this... > and they looked identical... if that helps... > > > Bill L <bill@billlorentzen.com> wrote: >>What version of LE is it? >> >>Ed wrote: >>> Hey guys (and gals)... I have setup my new firewire studio and I been > tracking >>> in Cubase LE that came with the program. Although the sonics seems ok > and >>> maybe it's just because I am new to Cuba
bris I've seen in a while. More > > >hypocracy. Whether you get it or not, your intelligence has just been > >insulted and be assured that what this is really all about it preparing > you > >to be bent over as consumption falls. Expect more of this BS as gas usage > > >goes down and therefore the tax revenue that a gallon of gas generates is > > >proportionately reduced. To make up for the revenue shortfall, we're going > > >to get taxed into oblivion........and I was even sorta' thinking about > >voting for a Democrat for president. The ne
e me close the program so I have to clean up all those monster >>> files... >>> hopefully someone understands what I mean here... And the plugins that >>> came with Cubase are... ummm... can you spell TERRIBLE! I tried to >>> adjust >>> the ones that I played with and I must say... WHAT were they thinking! > They >>> need lessons with plugins from Paris. An example is the chorus... I > apply >>> that to a track and sheesh... why waste my time. I max'd the thing >>> out... >>> not much of a difference. Is there plugins that go from mono to stereo, >>> like in Paris.. or is that just a Paris plugin thingy? >>> >>> I like the fact that Cubase LE is free with my device... but I am >>> hopeful >>> that there is something else out there that operates similar to Paris... >>> Anyone? >>> >Before you
pass judgement, make ill-informed assumptions and become a hypocrit yourself, read the context, ask questions, and attempt to actually understand other people. You just read a single word and extrapolated that into left field. This had nothing to do with race. You might has well launched off a diatribe on the problems with meteor storms on Pluto. And in case you were wondering, by "fabric" I meant guts to stand up for what you believe in with integrity, honor and respect, but without any pansy, pacifist whining and hiding behind labels and stereotypes. Btw - posting like this without your real name is cowardly and destroys any credibility to your opinion, but at least it supports my argument in spades. "Yah" <Blah@ya-ya.com> wrote: > >Listen, >My comments are not about the article,I'm not defending the left. I just >find the statement "the fabric of are country" to be bullshit. We forget >about >are past and pass judgement on others. This is the self-righteousness I speak >of. As to why I do not post my name? Because of the self-righteousness I >speak >of. Wake up! Clean up your backyard. Playing the race card? It could'nt be >played if racism was'nt true and alive today! You may look at my comments >as detour >into left field,but my comments are directed at your comment about the "fabric" >of are country. The truth is almost all the founding fathers were slave owners,and >some only freed their slaves after they died. Now there is one thing I agree >on >with you is that this place has gone way down! > >"Dedric Terry" <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote: >>And, btw - I can't believe anyone would even dare to post such racist >>propaganda as this >>(and that's exactly what it is) when the original post was on radical islam, > >>not slavery. Simply amazing. >> >>This forum really has lost it. I'm out. I've really had enough of these >>far
fetched bizarre reactions and detours into left field. >> >>"YAH" <bla-bla@yah.com> wrote in message news:47e3dde1$1@linux... >>> >>> The fabric of are nation? What is that? Salvery? segragation? racisim? > >>> the >>> KKK? >>> self-righteousness! >>> >>> >>> Dedric Terry <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote: >>>>I've heard two separate commentaries (one a major news agency, the other >>> a >>>>Brit's personal rant) about how the UK is catering to the whims of Islam >>> - >>>>they've restricted the use of the Three Little Pigs story in some schools. >>>>England is funding Islamic schools for their Muslim citizens. They are >>>>considering passing Islamic laws in some areas to appease that community >>>>(these were echoed in both, separate and independent commentaries - two >>>>completely different viewpoints seeing the same thing happen). In effect, >>>>the UK is making concessions right and left and getting nothing in return >>> - >>>>just more demands. Forget their own history, people and culture, just > >>>>give >>>>up in the face of fear of suicide bombers, sarin gas, and extremist >>>>protests. >>>> >>>>The news agency report basically said exactly what you are DJ - the US >is >>>>doing the same thing - bowing down and letting our "pacifist" leftwing > >>>>veil >>>>of "peace" and "equality" and "justice" dupe us into giving up those very >>>>ideals, playing right into the hands of extremism and even terrorism. >>>>That's the paradox that's become our country. And this is just one case >>> of >>>>how the left is ironically proposing and touting exactly the opposite >of >>>>what is the fabric of our country. >>>> >>>>DT >>>> >>>>On 3/21/08 7:49 AM, in article 47e3bffd@linux, "Mr. Simplicity" >>>><noway@jose.net> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Isn't this cute? >>>>> <a href="http://markhumphrys.com/left.islamic.html" target="_bl
t; <dt@noreply.com> wrote: > >Before you pass judgement, make ill-informed assumptions and become a hypocrit >yourself, read the context, ask questions, and attempt to actually understand >other people. You just read a single word and extrapolated that into left >field. > >This had nothing to do with race. You might has well launched off a diatribe >on the problems with meteor storms on Pluto. > >And in case you were wondering, by "fabric" I meant guts to stand up for >what you believe in with integrity, honor and respect, but without any pansy, >pacifist whining and hiding behind labels and stereotypes. > >Btw - posting like this without your real name is cowardly and destroys any >credibility to your opinion, but at least it supports my argument in spades. > > > >"Yah" <Blah@ya-ya.com> wrote: >> >>Listen, >>My comments are not about the article,I'm not defending the left. I just >>find the statement "the fabric of are country" to be bullshit. We forget >>about >>are past and pass judgement on others. This is the self-righteousness I >speak >>of. As to why I do not post my name? Because of the self-righteousness I >>speak >>of. Wake up! Clean up your backyard. Playing the race card? It could'nt >be >>played if racism was'nt true and alive today! You may look at my comments >>as detour >>into left field,but my comments are directed at your comment about the "fabric" >>of are country. The truth is almost all the founding fathers were slave >owners,and >>some only freed their slaves after they died. Now there is one thing I agree >>on >>with you is that this place has gone way down! >> >>"Dedric Terry" <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote: >>>And, btw - I can't believe anyone would even dare to post such racist >>>propaganda as this >>>(and that's exactly what it is) when the original post was on radical islam, >> >>>not slavery. Simply amazing. >>> >>>This forum really has lost it. I'm out. I've really had enough of these >>>far fetched bizarre reactions and detours into left field. >>> >>>"YAH" <bla-bla@yah.com> wrote in message news:47e3dde1$1@linux... >>>> >>>> The fabric of are nation? What is that? Salvery? segragation? racisim? >> >>>> the >>>> KKK? >>>> self-righteousness! >>>> >>>> >>>> Dedric Terry <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote: >>>>>I've heard two separate commentaries (one a major news agency, the other >>>> a >>>>>Brit's personal rant) about how the UK is catering to the whims of Islam >>>> - >>>>>they've restricted the use of the Three Little Pigs story in some schools. >>>>>England is funding Islamic schools for their Muslim citizens. They are >>>>>considering passing Islamic laws in some areas to appease that community >>>>>(these were echoed in both, separate and independent commentaries - two >>>>>completely different viewpoints seeing the same thing happen). In effect, >>>>>the UK is making concessions right and left and getting nothing in return >>>> - >>>>>just more demands. Forget their own history, people and culture, just >> >>>>>give >>>>>up in the face of fear of suicide bombers, sarin gas, and extremist >>>>>protests. >>>>> >>>>>The news agency report basically said exactly what you are DJ - the US >>is >>>>>doing the same thing - bowing down and letting our "pacifist" leftwing >> >>>>>veil >>>>>of "peace" and "equality" and "justice" dupe us into giving up those >very >>>>>ideals, playing right into the hands of extremism and even terrorism. >>>>>That's the paradox that's become our country. And this is just one case >>>> of >>>>>how the left is ironically proposing and touting exactly the opposite >>of >>>>>what is the fabric of our country. >>>>> >>>>>DT >>>>> >>>>>On 3/21/08 7:49 AM, in article 47e3bffd@linu
ank">http://markhumphrys.com/left.islamic.html >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> This one is the kicker though, and elucidates my periodic rants better >>> than >>>>> I do: >>>>> http://dineshdsouza.com/books/enemy-intro.html >>>>> >>>>> Our economy is gonna bounce along the bottom for a while. This wasn't >>>>> necessary. Now I hear the Democrats starting to harp on the economy >and >>> tie >>>>> it ti Iraq. there is, most definitely, a connection. >>>>> >>>>> http://drsanity.blogspot.com/2007/04/selfless-narcissism.htm l >>>>> >>>>> and the following excerpt is something I've been ranting about here >and >>>>> elsewhere for years: >>>>> The Democrats and their glorious leaders, who have become so >>>>> narcissistically invested in this country's defeat as a political >>>>> strategy >>>>> to accumulate power and "restore American honor", that they >>>>> have--wittingly >>>>> or unwittingly--decided to sell their countrymen out to the very enemy >>> they >>>>> are currently fighting. They mean well, of course. They do it for those >>>>> wonderful 'selfless' reasons--like "peace" and "social justice" and >all. >>>>> They really support the troops . >>>>> >>>>> Let's just ignore the fact that they bear considerable responsibility >>> for >>>>> the ongoing violence and death of our troops as they enable and >>>>> encourage >>>>> the priorities of the enemy. Why should the terrorists alter their >>>>> homicidal >>>>> behavior? It is working! People like Nancy Pelosi are living proof of >>> the >>>>> effectiveness of their strategy. >>>>> >>>>> There really is a problem. It's a problem that has been aggravated and >>>>> encouraged by the left in this country..........you know, the ones >who >>>>> don't quite understand that they will be the first to be slaughtered > >>>>> once >>>>> they have thrown a wrench in the gears of those who are willing to >>>>> protect >>>>> them. They just do not get it. The Islamists parrot the leftist American >>>>> Imperialist tripe that the leftists love to hear and ascribe to this > >>>>> country >>>>> but the Islamists do it by design, to dupe the left into helping them >>>>> destroy the protectors of the culture that the left hopes to protect >by >>>>> trying to appease those who will not be appeased until the leftists >are >>>>> either dead or are kneeling toward Mecca. Once it is too late, they >can >>> then >>>>> whine about how pissed off they are that there's no separation between >>>>> mosque and state...right before they are separated from their heads. >I >>>>> recognized it years ago. So did lots of other people.....funny, I didn't >>>>> hear a peep out of OBama though. >>>>> >>>>> OK......now I'm of to rape the land. >>>>>
>>>>> bye. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >sorry dude to hear you might get burned, that's always a real drag. I'm about 99.999% sure that Sarah J isn't Sarah Thompson. AA "Greg B" <funkykeys1@verizon.net> wrote in message news:47e3ea3d$1@linux... > > I initially thought the same thing... but emails are different. I did a > search > on the site for Sarah Thompson's email address and nothing came up as far > as past posts. I've submitted for conflict resolution at Paypal/Ebay but > honestly don't except much success. I've gone down that route before with > no results. It's a buyer beware world! > > > > "Miguel Vigil" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote: >>It should work out. Sarah is good! >> >>Ping Sarah Tonin >> >> >>"Gregb" <funkykeys1@verizon.net> wrote in message news:47e00445$1@linux... >>> >>> I bought an EDS card off Ebay from her (paid with Paypal) and haven't > >>> heard >>> a word from her in 2 weeks. No emails, no item in the mail, nothing. >>> Anyone?? >>> >>> Thanks! Greg >> >> >A MacCloskey?;-) "James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> skrev i en meddelelse news:47e3f616$1@linux... > > He should have got a Mac; ) > > "Miguel Vigil" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote: >>http://my.break.com/Content/view.aspx?ContentID=473507 >> >> >>Y'all remember that screaming german kid on his computer; the one with >>glasses and having a spaz attack. >> >> >> >>Well it been translated and now you know the rest of the story. >> >> >> >>El Miguel >> >> >you don't have to close the program to clean up files, use the pool and empty the trashYeah, this thread is being Hi-Jacked. If you want to cry about racism why don't you start a new thread Mr. D. We can try to get to the truth there. "Yah" <Blah@ya-ya.com> wrote: > >Listen, >My comments are not about the article,I'm not defending the left. I just >find the statement "the fabric of are country" to be bullshit. We forget >about >are past and pass judgement on others. This is the self-righteousness I speak >of. As to why I do not post my name? Because of the self-righteousness I >speak >of. Wake up! Clean up your backyard. Playing the race card? It could'nt be >played if racism was'nt true and alive today! You may look at my comments >as detour >into left field,but my comments are directed at your comment about the "fabric" >of are country. The truth is almost all th
e founding fathers were slave owners,and >some only freed their slaves after they died. Now there is one thing I agree >on >with you is that this place has gone way down! > >"Dedric Terry" <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote: >>And, btw - I can't believe anyone would even dare to post such racist >>propaganda as this >>(and that's exactly what it is) when the original post was on radical islam, > >>not slavery. Simply amazing. >> >>This forum really has lost it. I'm out. I've really had enough of these >>far fetched bizarre reactions and detours into left field. >> >>"YAH" <bla-bla@yah.com> wrote in message news:47e3dde1$1@linux... >>> >>> The fabric of are nation? What is that? Salvery? segragation? racisim? > >>> the >>> KKK? >>> self-righteousness! >>> >>> >>> Dedric Terry <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote: >>>>I've heard two separate commentaries (one a major news agency, the other >>> a >>>>Brit's personal rant) about how the UK is catering to the whims of Islam >>> - >>>>they've restricted the use of the Three Little Pigs story in some schools. >>>>England is funding Islamic schools for their Muslim citizens. They are >>>>considering passing Islamic laws in some areas to appease that community >>>>(these were echoed in both, separate and independent commentaries - two >>>>completely different viewpoints seeing the same thing happen). In effect, >>>>the UK is making concessions right and left and getting nothing in return >>> - >>>>just more demands. Forget their own history, people and culture, just > >>>>give >>>>up in the face of fear of suicide bombers, sarin gas, and extremist >>>>protests. >>>> >>>>The news agency report basically said exactly what you are DJ - the US >is >>>>doing the same thing - bowing down and letting our "pacifist" leftwing > >>>>veil >>>>of "peace" and "equality" and "justice" dupe us into giving up those very >>>>ideals, playing right into the hands of extremism and even terrorism. >>>>That's the paradox that's become our country. And this is just one case >>> of >>>>how the left is ironically proposing and touting exactly the opposite >of >>>>what is the fabric of our country. >>>> >>>>DT >>>> >>>>On 3/21/08 7:49 AM, in article 47e3bffd@linux, "Mr. Simplicity" >>>><noway@jose.net> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Isn't this cute? >>>>> http://markhumphrys.com/left.islamic.html >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> This one is the kicker though, and elucidates my periodic rants better >>> than >>>>> I do: >
>>>> http://dineshdsouza.com/books/enemy-intro.html >>>>> >>>>> Our economy is gonna bounce along the bottom for a while. This wasn't >>>>> necessary. Now I hear the Democrats starting to harp on the economy >and >>> tie >>>>> it ti Iraq. there is, most definitely, a connection. >>>>> >>>>> http://drsanity.blogspot.com/2007/04/selfless-narcissism.htm l >>>>> >>>>> and the following excerpt is something I've been ranting about here >and >>>>> elsewhere for years: >>>>> The Democrats and their glorious leaders, who have become so >>>>> narcissistically invested in this country's defeat as a political >>>>> strategy >>>>> to accumulate power and "restore American honor", that they >>>>> have--wittingly >>>>> or unwittingly--decided to sell their countrymen out to the very enemy >>> they >>>>> are currently fighting. They mean well, of course. They do it for those >>>>> wonderful 'selfless' reasons--like "peace" and "social justice" and >all. >>>>> They really support the troops . >>>>> >>>>> Let's just ignore the fact that they bear considerable responsibility >>> for >>>>> the ongoing violence and death of our troops as they enable and >>>>> encourage >>>>> the priorities of the enemy. Why should the terrorists alter their >>>>> homicidal >>>>> behavior? It is working! People like Nancy Pelosi are living proof of >>> the >>>>> effectiveness of their strategy. >>>>> >>>>> There really is a problem. It's a problem that has been aggravated and >>>>> encouraged by the left in this country..........you know, the ones >who >>>>> don't quite understand that they will be the first to be slaughtered > >>>>> once >>>>> they have thrown a wrench in the gears of those who are willing to >>>>> protect >>>>> them. They just do not get it. The Islamists parrot the leftist American >>>>> Imperialist tripe that the leftists love to hear and ascribe to this > >>>>> country >>>>> but the Islamists do it by design, to dupe the left into helping them >>>>> destroy the protectors of the culture that the left hopes to protect >by >>>>> trying to appease those who will not be appeased until the leftists >are >>>>> either dead or are kneeling toward Mecca. Once it is too late, they >can >>> then >>>>> whine about how pissed off they are that there's no separation between >>>>> mosque and state...right before they are separated from their heads. >I >>>>> recognized it years ago. So did lots of other people.....funny, I didn't >>>>> hear a peep out of OBama though. >>>>> >>>>> OK......now I'm of to rape the land. >>>>> >>>>> bye. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >Why do yoy think that your opinion is the right one? Are you saying that this country was'nt built on the backs of slavery? How am I a hypocrite? Ask questions? My first post was nothing but questions. Having the guts to stand up for what you believe in with integrity, honor and respect, but without any pansy, pacifist whining and hiding behind labels and stereotypes". are serious? Why did it take so long for every man to have the right same rights? Is'nt that something we were suppose to believe in? Honor? respect? Look,do'nt get made at me or anyone that confronts you with the truth. I love this country just as much as you. If I can say that with your permission. But we have alot of work to do. We want to blame everyone else for are problems.(not to say we are the cause of all the problems) Think what you want about my credibility,my words can stand on there own! This makes them no less true "Dedric Terry&quo
/> >>>>>> elsewhere for years: >>>>>> The Democrats and their glorious leaders, who have become so >>>>>> narcissistically invested in this country's defeat as a political >>>>>> strategy >>>>>> to accumulate power and "restore American honor", that they >>>>>> have--wittingly >>>>>> or unwittingly--decided to sell their countrymen out to the very enemy >>>> they >>>>>> are currently fighting. They mean well, of course. They do it for those >>>>>> wonderful 'selfless' reasons--like "peace" and "social justice" and >>all. >>>>>> They really support th
ho are willing to > >>>>>> protect >>>>>> them. They just do not get it. The Islamists parrot the leftist American >>>>>> Imperialist tripe that the leftists love to hear and ascribe to this >> >>>>>> country >>>>>> but the Islamists do it by design, to dupe the left into helping them >>>>>> destroy the protectors of the culture that the left hopes to protect >>by >>>>>> trying to appease those who will not be appeased until the leftists >>are >>>>>> either dead or are kneeling toward Mecca. Once it is too late, they >>can >>>> then >>>>>> whine about how pissed off they are that there's no separation between >>>>>> mosque and state...right before they are separated from their heads. >>I >>>>>> recognized it years ago. So did lots of other people.....funny, I didn't >>>>>> hear a peep out of OBama though. >>>>>> >>>>>> OK......now I'm of to rape the land. >>>>>> >>>>>> bye. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >Cubase LE v4 is now starting to ship with new interfaces. If you got V3, you should request v4. There are many improvements in v4. "Ed" <askme@email.com> wrote: > >Ummm.. not sure. Whatever the latest Cubase LE is... cause it came with a >device that is brand new. I am positive it isn't an older copy. But really... >I don't think that matters too much. I would like to find a tracking program >for my firewire device that is closer to Paris. Is there anything out there >like that? Or, what are some others using that they like besides Cubase? > >Oh! and since I don't know what version of Cubase LE I have (I don't have >the disc here or the program), I did try the demo of Cubase 4 before this... >and they looked identical... if that helps... > > >Bill L <bill@billlorentzen.com> wrote: >>What version of LE is it? >> >>Ed wrote: >>> Hey guys (and gals)... I have setup my new firewire studio and I b
t; came with Cubase are... ummm... can you spell TERRIBLE! I tried to adjust >>> the ones that I played with and I must say... WHAT were they thinking! > They >>> need lessons with plugins from Paris. An example is the chorus... I >apply >>> that to a track and sheesh... why waste my time. I max'd the thing out... >>> not much of a difference. Is there plugins that go from mono to stereo, >>> like in Paris.. or is that just a Paris plugin thingy? >>> >>> I like the fact that Cubase LE is free with my device... but I am hopeful >>> that there is something else out there that operates similar to Paris... >>> Anyone? >>> >it looked like he did :P AA "James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:47e3f616$1@linux... > > He should have got a Mac; ) > > "Miguel Vigil" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote: >>http://my.break.com/Content/view.aspx?ContentID=473507 >> >> >>Y'all remember that screaming german kid on his computer; the one with >>glasses and having a spaz attack. >> >> >> >>Well it been translated and now you know the rest of the story. >> >> >> >>El Miguel >> >> >Wish it were that easy, James. We would be poor stewards of the land indeed if we carelessly dismissed the evidence to date. It's not particularly prudent to ignore increasing evidence that shows possible problems. The atmosphere and our use of it to store increasing amounts of unwanted greenhouse gases is a big enough subject scientifically without being sidetracked by political and economic conspiracy theories. Even if you enjoy discussing perceived conspiracies, be sure you don't confuse them with the ongoing science. Cheers, -Jamie www.JamieKrutz.com James McCloskey wrote: > What we need is waders and a big shovel to get rid of this load of crap. > > > "BR" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote: >> The humanity is facing it's biggest disaster in 100 000 years. Tax raises >> won't solve anything, it demand a lot more action than that.. >> BR<br
"Mr. Simplicity" <noway@jose.net> wrote: >>> >>> http://blog.mlive.com/annarbornews/2007/09/dingell_global_wa rming_may_req.h >> tml >>>> This is the biggest load of disingenuous hubris I've seen in a while. >> More >>>> hypocracy. Whether you get it or not, your intelligence has just been >>>> insulted and be assured that what this is really all about it preparing >>> you >>>> to be bent over as consumption falls. Expect more of this BS as gas usage >>>> goes down and therefore the tax revenue that a gallon of gas generates > is >>>> proportionately reduced. To make up for the revenue shortfall, we're >> going >>>> to get taxed into oblivion........and I was even sorta' thinking about >>>> voting for a Democrat for president. The new forumla for the American >>>> economy is to tax businesses more so that they will continue to go >> elsewhere >>>> while screwing the workers who will be losing their jobs. >>>> >>>> Gimme some of that. >>>> >>>> >> >Why don't you start a new thread and we can throw down there? "yah" <Blah@ya-ya.com> wrote: > >Why do yoy think that your opinion is the right one? Are you saying that this >country >was'nt built on the backs of slavery? How am I a hypocrite? Ask questions? >My >first post was nothing but questions. Having the guts to stand up for >what you believe in with integrity, honor and respect, but without any pansy, >pacifist whining and hiding behind labels and stereotypes". are serious? >Why did it take so long for every man to have the right same rights? Is'nt >that something we were suppose to believe in? Honor? respect? Look,do'nt >get >made at me or anyone that confronts you with the truth. I love this country >just as much as you. If I can say that with your permission. But we >have alot of work to do. We want to blame everyone else for are problems.(not >to say we are the cause of all the problems) Think what you want about my >credibility,my words can stand on there own! This makes them no less true > >"Dedric Terry" <dt@noreply.com> wrote: >> >>Before you pass judgement, make ill-informed assumptions and become a hypocrit >>yourself, read the context, ask questions, and attempt to actually understand >>other people. You just read a single word and extrapolated that into left >>field. >> >>This had nothing to do with race. You might has well launched off a diatribe >>on the problems with meteor storms on Pluto. >> >>And in case you were wondering, by "fabric" I meant guts to stand up for >>what you believe in with integrity, honor and respect, but without any pansy, >>pacifist whining and hiding behind labels and stereotypes. >> >>Btw - posting like this without your real name is cowardly and destroys >any >>credibility to your opinion, but at least it supports my argument in spades. >> >> >> >>"Yah" <Blah@ya-ya.com> wrote: >>> >>>Listen, >>>My comments are not about the article,I'm not defending the left. I just >>>find the statement "the fabric of are country" to be bullshit. We forget >>>about >>>are past and pass judgement on others. This is the self-righteousness I >>speak >>>of. As to why I do not post my name? Because of the self-righteousness >I >>>speak >>>of. Wake up! Clean up your backyard. Playing the race card? It could'nt >>be >>>played if racism was'nt true and alive today! You may look at my comments >>>as detour >>>into left field,but my comments are directed at your comment about the >"fabric" >>>of are country. The truth is almost all the founding fathers were slave >>owners,and >>>some only freed their slaves after they died. Now there is one thing I >agree >>>on >>>with you is that this place has gone way down! >>> >>>"Dedric Terry" <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote: >>>>And, btw - I can't believe anyone would even dare to post such racist > >>>>propaganda as this >>>>(and that's exactly what it is) when the original post was on radical >islam, >>> >>>>not slavery. Simply amazing. >>>> >>>>This forum really has lost it. I'm out. I've really had enough of these >>>>far fetched bizarre reactions and detours into left field. >>>> >>>>"YAH" <bla-bla@yah.com> wrote in message news:47e3dde1$1@linux... >>>>> >>>>> The fabric of are nation? What is that? Salvery? segragation? racisim? >>> >>>>> the >>>>> KKK? >>>>> self-righteousness! >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Dedric Terry <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote: >>>>>>I've heard two separate commentaries (one a major news agency, the other >>>>> a >>>>>>Brit's personal rant) about how the UK is catering to the whims of Islam >>>>> - >>>>>>they've restricted the use of the Three Little Pigs story in some schools. >>>>>>England is funding Islamic schools for their Muslim citizens. They >are >>>>>>considering passing Islamic laws in some areas to appease that community >>>>>>(these were echoed in both, separate and independent commentaries - >two >>>>>>completely different viewpoints seeing the same thing happen). In effect, >>>>>>the UK is making concessions right and left and getting nothing in return >>>>> - >>>>>>just more demands. Forget their own history, people and culture, just >>> >>>>>>give >>>>>>up in the face of fear of suicide bombers, sarin gas, and extremist >>>>>>protests. >>>>>> >>>>>>The news agency report basically said exactly what you are DJ - the >US >>>is >>>>>>doing the same thing - bowing down and letting our "pacifist" leftwing >>> >>>>>>veil >>>>>>of "peace" and "equality" and "justice" dupe us into giving up those >>very >>>>>>ideals, playing right into the hands of extremism and even terrorism. >>>>>>That's the paradox that's become our country. And this is just one >case >>>>> of >>>>>>how the left is ir
gt;>>two >>>>>>>>completely different viewpoints seeing the same thing happen). In >>effect, >>>>>>>>the UK is making concessions right and left and getting nothing in >>return >>>>>>> - >>>>>>>>just more demands. Forget their own history, people and culture, >just >>>>> >>>>>>>>give >>>>>>>>up in the face of fear of suicide bombers, sarin gas, and extremist >>>>>>>>protests. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>The news agency report basically said exactly what you are DJ - the >>>US >>>>>is >>>>>>>>doing the same thing - bowing down and letting our "pacifist" leftwing >>>>> >>>>>>>>veil >>>>>>>>of "peace" and "equality" and "justice" dupe us into giving up those >>>>very >>>>>>>>ideals, playing right into the hands of extremism and even terrorism. >>>>>>>>That's the paradox that's become our country. And this is just one >>>case >>>>>>> of >>>>>>>>how the left is ironically proposing and touting exactly the opposite >>>>>of >>>>>>>>what is the fabric of our country. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>DT >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>On 3/21/08 7:49 AM, in article 47e3bffd@linux, "Mr. Simplicity" >>>>>>>><noway@jose.net> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Isn't this cute? >>>>>>>>> http://markhumphrys.com/left.islamic.html >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> This one is the kicker though, and elucidates my periodic rants >better >>>>>>> than >>>>>>>>> I do: >>>>>>>>> http://dineshdsouza.com/books/enemy-intro.html >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Our economy is gonna bounce along the bottom for a while. This wasn't >>>>>>>>> necessary. Now I hear the Democrats starting to harp on the economy >>>>>and >>>>>>> tie >>>>>>>>> it ti Iraq. there is, most definitely, a connection. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> http://drsanity.blogspot.com/2007/04/selfless-narcissism.htm l >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> and the following excerpt is something I've been ranting about here >>>>>and >>>>>>>>> elsewhere for years: >>>>>>>>> The Democrats and their glorious leaders, who have become so >>>>>>>>> narcissistically invested in this country's defeat as a political >>> >>>>>>>>> strategy >>>>>>>>> to accumulate power and "restore American honor", that they >>>>>>>>> have--wittingly >>>>>>>>> or unwittingly--decided to sell their countrymen out to the very >>enemy >>>>>>> they >>>>>>>>> are currently fighting. They mean well, of course. They do it for >>>those >>>>>>>>> wonderful 'selfless' reasons--like "peace" and "social justice" >and >>>>>all. >>>>>>>>> They really support the troops . >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Let's just ignore the fact that they bear considerable responsibility >>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>> the ongoing violence and death of our troops as they enable and > >>>>>>>>> encourage >>>>>>>>> the priorities of the enemy. Why should the terrorists alter their >>>> >>>>>>>>> homicidal >>>>>>>>> behavior? It is working! People like Nancy Pelosi are living proof >>>>of >>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>> effectiveness of their strategy. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> There really is a problem. It's a problem that has been aggravated >>>>and >>>>>>>>> encouraged by the left in this country..........you know, the ones >>>>>who >>>>>>>>> don't quite understand that they will be the first to be slaughtered >>>>> >>>>>>>>> once >>>>>>>>> they have thrown a wrench in the gears of those who are willing >to >>>> >>>>>>>>> protect >>>>>>>>> them. They just do not get it. The Islamists parrot the leftist >American >>>>>>>>> Imperialist tripe that the leftists love to hear and ascribe to >this >>>>> >>>>>>>>> country >>>>>>>>> but the Islamists do it by design, to dupe the left into helping >>them >>>>>>>>> destroy the protectors of the culture that the left hopes to protect >>>>>by >>>>>>>>> trying to appease those who will not be appeased until the leftists >>>>>are >>>>>>>>> either dead or are kneeling toward Mecca. Once it is too late, they >>>>>can >>>>>>> then >>>>>>>>> whine about how pissed off they are that there's no separation between >>>>>>>>> mosque and state...right before they are separated from their heads. >>>>>I >>>>>>>>> recognized it years ago. So did lots of other people.....funny, >I >>>didn't >>>>>>>>> hear a peep out of OBama though. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> OK......now I'm of to rape the land. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> bye. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >rick <parnell68@hotmail.com> wrote: >again, i know the story is about language, confusion and other bright >ideas men come up with. >sorry, but i have a problem with "men" had one language thing. just >as i have a problem with god being suprised that adam and eve would >partake of the forbidden fruit when told no no no you don't. he's >god...for his sakes... guess he also didn't think of incest when >populating the earth from just one pair of peeps. i mean cain went to >the land of nod and eventually married...who...i don't >know...mom...sis...cousin rita??? >i believe god was smart enough to create the laws of physics that >allow certain things to happen under certain conditions and lets the >chips fall where they may. to me god doesn't kill 250 people on a >plane and spare one as a lesson of his devine intervention >capabilities. he doesn't kill half a town yet spares a church so they >have somewhere to mourn the dead. >the truely (again to me) sad thing about the differing concepts of god >is how their used to validate the harm we do each other. > > >On 22 Mar 2008 00:13:36 +1000, "Steve Cox" <stevec1@charter.net> >wrote: > >>http://ldolphin.org/babel.html >What did you think of him? Good coach? Cheers, -Jamie www.JamieKrutz.com rick wrote: > dingle was my little league baseball coach...seriously. > > > > On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 16:04:54 -0600, Jamie K <Meta@Dimensional.com> > wrote: > >> Let's just say for the moment, for the sake of argument, that Al Gore is >> a cheese sandwich. OK? And on another side, Let's say Exxon is a tofu >> burger. Alright? Let's just say they are both inconsequential, however >> you want to visualize that, so we can let all of that go and talk about >> something more fundamental. >> >> What if the scientists are right that the greenhouse gases (which >> actually DO help keep the planet warm enough for human habitation or we >> wouldn't be here talking about it - those gases) what if they DO retain >> additional heat when we add to them faster than natural cycles can >> mitigate? >> >> That's a reasonable possibility. Retaining heat is what greenhouse gases >> do. As a simple analogy, put on a more insulated blanket at night and >> you're likely to be warmer, overall. >> >> Possible changes in the atmosphere and the likely repercussions are what >> many professional and reasonably sane scientists are reporting and >> discussing. >> >> There is a real chance something is happening in the atmosphere due to >> human contributions to greenhouse gases. Which means there's a real >> chance we have to deal with it one way or another. Proactively or >> reactively. And it's very likely to be easier to deal with sooner than >> later. >> >> When a Michigan congressman who is one of the main defenders of the auto >> industry in Washington starts talking plainly about the ramifications of >> human contributions to greenhouse gases, that's news. >> >> It's not enough to merely tar him as a Democrat. This is the guy who >> held up updating CAFE. He has not been shy about representing the auto >> industry. >> >> Cheers, >> -Jamie >> www.JamieKrutz.com >> >> >> >> James McCloskey wrote: >>> This is what i've been saying. When Al Gore buys global offsets for t
gt;>>>>>> This one is the kicker though, and elucidates my periodic rants better >>>>> than >>>>>>> I do: >>>>>>> http://dineshdsouza.com/books/enemy-intro.html >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Our economy is gonna bounce along the bottom for a while. This wasn't >>>>>>> necessary. Now I hear the Democrats starting to harp on the economy >>>and >>>>> tie >>>>>>> it ti Iraq. there is, most definitely, a connection. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://drsanity.blogspot.com/2007/04/selfless-narcissism.htm l >>>>>>> >>>>>>> and the following excerpt is something I've been ranting about here >>>and >>>>>>> elsewhere for years: >>>>>>> The Democrats and their glorious leaders, who have become so >>>>>>> narcissistically invested in this country's defeat as a political > >>>>>>> strategy >>>>>>> to accumulate power and "restore American honor", that they >>>>>>> have--wittingly >>>>>>> or unwittingly--decided to sell their countrymen out to the very enemy >>>>> they >>>>>>> are currently fighting. They mean well, of course. They do it for >those >>>>>>> wonderful 'selfless' reasons--like "peace" and "social justice" and >>>all. >>>>>>> They really support the troops . >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Let's just ignore the fact that they bear considerable responsibility >>>>> for >>>>>>> the ongoing violence and death of our troops as they enable and >>>>>>> encourage >>>>>>> the priorities of the enemy. Why should the terrorists alter their >> >>>>>>> homicidal >>>>>>> behavior? It is working! People like Nancy Pelosi are living proof >>of >>>>> the >>>>>>> effectiveness of their strategy. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> There really is a problem. It's a problem that has been aggravated >>and >>>>>>> encouraged by the left in this country..........you know, the ones >>>who >>>>>>> don't quite understand that they will be the first to be slaughtered >>> >>>>>>> once >>>>>>> they have thrown a wrench in the gears of those who are willing to >> >>>>>>> protect >>>>>>> them. They just do not get it. The Islamists parrot the leftist American >>>>>>> Imperialist tripe that the leftists love to hear and ascribe to this >>> >>>>>>> country >>>>>>> but the Islamists do it by design, to dupe the left into helping them >>>>>>> destroy the protectors of the culture that the left hopes to protect >>>by >>>>>>> trying to appease those who will not be appeased until the leftists >>>are >>>>>>> either dead or are kneeling toward Mecca. Once it is too late, they >>>can >>>>> then >>>>>>> whine about how pissed off they are that there's no separation between >>>>>>> mosque and state...right before they are separated from their heads. >>>I >>>>>>> recognized it years ago. So did lots of other people.....funny, I >didn't >>>>>>> hear a peep out of OBama though. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> OK......now I'm of to rape the land. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> bye. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >Do you really want to ruin Good Friday LaMont? "James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote: > >Why don't you start a new thread and we can throw down there? > >"yah" <Blah@ya-ya.com> wrote: >> >>Why do yoy think that your opinion is the right one? Are you saying that >this >>country >>was'nt built on the backs of slavery? How am I a hypocrite? Ask questions? >>My >>first post was nothing but questions. Having the guts to stand up for >>what you believe in with integrity, honor and respect, but without any pansy, >>pacifist whining and hiding behind labels and stereotypes". are serious? >>Why did it take so long for every man to have the right same rights? Is'nt >>that something we were suppose to believe in? Honor? respect? Look,do'nt >>get >>made at me or anyone that confronts you with the truth. I love this country >>just as much as you. If I can say that with your permission. But we >>have alot of work to do. We want to blame everyone else for are problems.(not >>to say we are the cause of all the problems) Think what you want about my >>credibility,my words can stand on there own! This makes them no less true >> >>"Dedric Terry" <dt@noreply.com> wrote: >>> >>>Before you pass judgement, make ill-informed assumptions and become a hypocrit >>>yourself, read the context, ask questions, and attempt to actually understand >>>other people. You just read a single word and extrapolated that into left >>>field. >>> >>>This had nothing to do with race. You might has well launched off a diatribe >>>on the problems with meteor storms on Pluto. >>> >>>And in case you were wondering, by "fabric" I meant guts to stand up for >>>what you believe in with integrity, honor and respect, but without any >pansy, >>>pacifist whining and hiding behind labels and stereotypes. >>> >>>Btw - posting like this without your real name is cowardly and destroys >>any >>>credibility to your opinion, but at least it supports my argument in spades. >>> >>> >>> >>>"Yah" <Blah@ya-ya.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>Listen, >>>>My comments are not about the article,I'm not defending the left. I just >>>>find the statement "the fabric of are country" to be bullshit. We forget >>>>about >>>>are past and pass judgement on others. This is the self-righteousness >I >>>speak >>>>of. As to why I do not post my name? Because of the self-righteousness >>I >>>>speak >>>>of. Wake up! Clean up your backyard. Playing the race card? It could'nt >>>be >>>>played if racism was'nt true and alive today! You may look at my comments >>>>as detour >>>>into left field,but my comments are directed at your comment about the >>"fabric" >>>>of are country. The truth is almost all the founding fathers were slave >>>owners,and >>>>some only freed their slaves after they died. Now there is one thing I >>agree >>>>on >>>>with you is that this place has gone way down! >>>> >>>>"Dedric Terry" <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote: >>>>>And, btw - I can't believe anyone would even dare to post such racist >> >>>>>propaganda as this >>>>>(and that's exactly what it is) when the original post was on radical >>islam, >>>> >>>>>not slavery. Simply amazing. >>>>> >>>>>This forum really has lost it. I'm out. I've really had enough of these >>>>>far fetched bizarre reactions and detours into left field. >>>>> >>>>>"YAH" <bla-bla@yah.com> wrote in message news:47e3dde1$1@linux... >>>>>> >>>>>> The fabric of are nation? What is that? Salvery? segragation? racisim? >>>> >>>>>> the >>>>>> KKK? >>>>>> self-righteousness! >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Dedric Terry <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote: >>>>>>>I've heard two separate commentaries (one a major news agency, the >other >>>>>> a >>>>>>>Brit's personal rant) about how the UK is catering to the whims of >Islam >>>>>> - >>>>>>>they've restricted the use of the Three Little Pigs story in some schools. >>>>>>>England is funding Islamic schools for their Muslim citizens. They >>are >>>>>>>considering passing Islamic laws in some areas to appease that community >>>>>>>(these were echoed in both, separate and independent commentaries - >>two >>>>>>>completely
'selfless' reasons--like "peace" and "social justice" and >>>>all. >>>>>>>> They really support the troops . >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Let's just ignore the fact that they bear considerable responsibility >>>>>> for >>>>>>>> the ongoing violence and death of our troops as they enable and >>>>>>>> encourage >>>>>>>> the priorities of the enemy. Why should the terrorists alter their >>> >>>>>>>> homicidal >>>>>>>> behavior? It is working! People like Nancy Pelosi are living proof >>>of >>>>>> the >>>>>>>> effectiveness of their strategy. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> There really is a problem. It's a problem that has been aggravated >>>and >>>>>>>> encouraged by the left in this country..........you know, the ones >>>>who >>>>>>>> don't quite understand that they will be the first to be slaughtered >>>> >>>>>>>> once >>>>>>>> they have thrown a wrench in the gears of those who are willing to >>> >>>>>>>> protect >>>>>>>> them. They just do not get it. The Islamists parrot the leftist American >>>>>>>> Imperialist tripe that the leftists love to hear and ascribe to this >>>> >>>>>>>> country >>>>>>>> but the Islamists do it by design, to dupe the left into helping >them >>>>>>>> destroy the protectors of the culture that the left hopes to protect >>>>by >>>>>>>> trying to appease those who will not be appeased until the leftists >>>>are >>>>>>>> either dead or are kneeling toward Mecca. Once it is too late, they >>>>can >>>>>> then >>>>>>>> whine about how pissed off they are that there's no separation between >>>>>>>> mosque and state...right before they are separated from their heads. >>>>I >>>>>>>> recognized it years ago. So did lots of other people.....funny, I >>didn't >>>>>>>> hear a peep out of OBama though. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> OK......now I'm of to rape the land. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> bye. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >"Aaron Allen" <know-spam@not_here.dude> wrote: >it looked like he did :P > >AA > No, it's definitely a PC, we don't use ActiveX; ) >"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote in message >news:47e3f616$1@linux... >> >> He should have got a Mac; ) >> >> "Miguel Vigil" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote: >>>http://my.break.com/Content/view.aspx?ContentID=473507 >>> >>> >>>Y'all remember that screaming german kid on his computer; the one with >>>glasses and having a spaz attack. >>> >>> >>> >>>Well it been translated and now you know the rest of the story. >>> >>> >>> >>>El Miguel >>> >>> >> > >"erlilo" <erlingl@tdcadsl.dk> wrote: >A MacCloskey?;-) Irish bastard; ) > >"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> skrev i en meddelelse >news:47e3f616$1@linux... >> >> He should have got a Mac; ) >> >> "Miguel Vigil" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote: >>>http://my.break.com/Content/view.aspx?ContentID=473507 >>> >>> >>>Y'all remember that screaming german kid on his computer; the one with >>>glasses and having a spaz attack. >>> >>> >>> >>>Well it been translated and now you know the rest of the story. >>> >>> >>> >>>El Miguel >>> >>> >> > >I'm not Lamont.....Christ dying today could'nt get worse. I never understood how Christ dying was good,maybe it should have been Sad friday. "James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote: > >Do you really want to ruin Good Friday LaMont? > >"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote: >> >>Why don't you start a new threa
d and we can throw down there? >> >>"yah" <Blah@ya-ya.com> wrote: >>> >>>Why do yoy think that your opinion is the right one? Are you saying that >>this >>>country >>>was'nt built on the backs of slavery? How am I a hypocrite? Ask questions? >>>My >>>first post was nothing but questions. Having the guts to stand up for >>>what you believe in with integrity, honor and respect, but without any >pansy, >>>pacifist whining and hiding behind labels and stereotypes". are serious? >>>Why did it take so long for every man to have the right same rights? Is'nt >>>that something we were suppose to believe in? Honor? respect? Look,do'nt >>>get >>>made at me or anyone that confronts you with the truth. I love this country >>>just as much as you. If I can say that with your permission. But we >>>have alot of work to do. We want to blame everyone else for are problems.(not >>>to say we are the cause of all the problems) Think what you want about >my >>>credibility,my words can stand on there own! This makes them no less true >>> >>>"Dedric Terry" <dt@noreply.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>Before you pass judgement, make ill-informed assumptions and become a >hypocrit >>>>yourself, read the context, ask questions, and attempt to actually understand >>>>other people. You just read a single word and extrapolated that into >left >>>>field. >>>> >>>>This had nothing to do with race. You might has well launched off a diatribe >>>>on the problems with meteor storms on Pluto. >>>> >>>>And in case you were wondering, by "fabric" I meant guts to stand up for >>>>what you believe in with integrity, honor and respect, but without any >>pansy, >>>>pacifist whining and hiding behind labels and stereotypes. >>>> >>>>Btw - posting like this without your real name is cowardly and destroys >>>any >>>>credibility to your opinion, but at least it supports my argument in spades. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>"Yah" <Blah@ya-ya.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>Listen, >>>>>My comments are not about the article,I'm not defending the left. I just >>>>>find the statement "the fabric of are country" to be bullshit. We forget >>>>>about >>>>>are past and pass judgement on others. This is the self-righteousness >>I >>>>speak >>>>>of. As to why I do not post my name? Because of the self-righteousness >>>I >>>>>speak >>>>>of. Wake up! Clean up your backyard. Playing the race card? It could'nt >>>>be >>>>>played if racism was'nt true and alive today! You may look at my comments >>>>>as detour >>>>>into left field,but my comments are directed at your comment about the >>>"fabric" >>>>>of are country. The truth is almost all the founding fathers were slave >>>>owners,and >>>>>some only freed their slaves after they died. Now there is one thing >I >>>agree >>>>>on >>>>>with you is that this place has gone way down! >>>>> >>>>>"Dedric Terry" <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote: >>>>>>And, btw - I can't believe anyone would even dare to post such racist >>> >>>>>>propaganda as this >>>>>>(and that's exactly what it is) when the original post was on radical >>>islam, >>>>> >>>>>>not slavery. Simply amazing. >>>>>> >>>>>>This forum really has lost it. I'm out. I've really had enough of >these >>>>>>far fetched bizarre reactions and detours into left field. >>>>>> >>>>>>"YAH" <bla-bla@yah.com> wrote in message news:47e3dde1$1@linux... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The fabric of are nation? What is that? Salvery? segragation? racisim? >>>>> >>>>>>> the >>>>>>> KKK? >>>>>>> self-righteousness! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Dedric Terry <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>I've heard two separate commentaries (one a major news agency, the >>other >>>>>>> a >>>>>>>>Brit's personal rant) about how the UK is catering to the whims of >>Islam >>>>>>> - >>>>>>>>they've restricted the use of the Three Little Pigs story in some >schools. >>>>>>>>England is funding Islamic schools for their Muslim citizens. They >>>are >>>>>>>>considering passing Islamic laws in some areas to appease that community >>>>>>>>(these were echoed in both, separate and independent commentaries >- &
gt;>> >>>> Gimme some of that. >>>> >>>> >Rick, I HIGHLY reccomend you crack the book open and read the text for yourself. You keep coming up with all these goofy things about a tree being a tree and swinging a cat around... Man... that's all just foolishness. Please, read it first-THEN bring on the comments. Right now all you are doing is "babelling" about something you don't know anything about. Read the text.... It WAS all about all the Babylonians speaking Babalonian. Not a hard concept to understand. God wanted to break their power of agreement so he confused the language and no-one understood each other and the progress of the tower seeced. Why are you fighting such a simple, well known, taught to millions, established story? You are fortunate that there are
(just assuming guys)a handful of Believers on this Forum who (you may as well face it) won't back down from the Truth? rick <parnell68@hotmail.com> wrote: >again, i know the story is about language, confusion and other bright >ideas men come up with. >sorry, but i have a problem with "men" had one language thing. just >as i have a problem with god being suprised that adam and eve would >partake of the forbidden fruit when told no no no you don't. he's >
god...for his sakes... guess he also didn't think of incest when >populating the earth from just one pair of peeps. i mean cain went to &gt
onts you with the truth. I love this country >>>>just as much as you. If I can say that with your permission. But we >>>>have alot of work to do. We want to blame everyone else for are problems.(not >>>>to say we are the cause of all the problems) Think what you want about >>my >>>>credibility,my words can stand on there own! This makes them no less true >>>> >>>>"Dedric Terry" <dt@noreply.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>Before you pass judgement, make ill-informed assumptions and become a >>hypocrit >>>>>yourself, read the context, ask questions, and attempt to actually understand >>>>>other people. You just read a single word and extrapolated that into >>left >>>>>field. >>>>> >>>>>This had nothing to do with race. You might has well launched off a >diatribe >>>>>on the problems with meteor storms on Pluto. >>>>> >>>>>And in case you were wondering, by "fabric" I meant guts to stand up >for >>>>>what you believe in with integrity, honor and respect, but without any >>>pansy, >>>>>pacifist whining and hiding behind labels and stereotypes. >>>>> >>>>>Btw - posting like this without your real name is cowardly and destroys >>>>any >>>>>credibility to your opinion, but at least it supports my argument in >spades. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>"Yah" <Blah@ya-ya.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>Listen, >>>>>>My comments are not about the article,I'm not defending the left. I >just >>>>>>find the statement "the fabric of are country" to be bullshit. We forget >>>>>>about >>>>>>are past and pass judgement on others. This is the self-righteousness >>>I >>>>>speak >>>>>>of. As to why I do not post my name? Because of the self-righteousness >>>>I >>>>>>speak >>>>>>of. Wake up! Clean up your backyard. Playing the race card? It could'nt >>>>>be >>>>>>played if racism was'nt true and alive today! You may look at my comments >>>>>>as detour >>>>>>into left field,but my comments are directed at your comment about the >>>>"fabric" >>>>>>of are country. The truth is almost all the founding fathers were slave >>>>>owners,and >>>>>>some only freed their slaves after they died. Now there is one thing >>I >>>>agree >>>>>>on >>>>>>with you is that this place has gone way down! >>>>>> >>>>>>"Dedric Terry" <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote: >>>>>>>And, btw - I can't believe anyone would even dare to post such racist >>>> >>>>>>>propaganda as this >>>>>>>(and that's exactly what it is) when the original post was on radical >>>>islam, >>>>>> >>>>>>>not slavery. Simply amazing. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>This forum really has lost it. I'm out. I've really had enough of >>these >>>>>>>far fetched bizarre reactions and detours into left field. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>"YAH" <bla-bla@yah.com> wrote in message news:47e3dde1$1@linux... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The fabric of are nation? What is that? Salvery? segragation? racisim? >>>>>> >>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>> KKK? >>>>>>>> self-righteousness! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Dedric Terry <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>I've heard two separate commentaries (one a major news agency, the >>>other >>>>>>>> a >>>>>>>>>Brit's personal rant) about how the UK is catering to the whims of >>>Islam >>>>>>>> - >>>>>>>>>they've restricted the use of the Three Little Pigs story in some >>schools. >>>>>>>>>England is funding Islamic schools for their Muslim citizens. They >>>>are >>>>>>>>>considering passing Islamic laws in some areas to appease that community >>>>>>>>>(these were echoed in both, separate and independent commentaries >>- >>>>two >>>>>>>>>completely different viewpoints seeing the same thing happen). In >>>effect, >>>>>>>>>the UK is making concessions right and left and getting nothing in >>>return >>>>>>>> - >>>>>>>>>just more demands. Forget their own history, people and culture, >>just >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>give >>>>>>>>>up in the face of fear of suicide bombers, sarin gas, and extremist >>>>>>>>>protests. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>The news agency report basically said exactly what you are DJ - the >>>>US >>>>>>is >>>>>>>>>doing the same thing - bowing down and letting our "pacifist" leftwing >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>veil >>>>>>>>>of "peace" and "equality" and "justice" dupe us into giving up those >>>>>very >>>>>>>>>ideals, playing right into the hands of extremism and even terrorism. >>>>>>>>>That's the paradox that's become our country. And this is just one >>>>case >>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>>>how the left is ironically proposing and touting exactly the opposite >>>>>>of >>>>>>>>>what is the fabric of our country. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>DT >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>On 3/21/08 7:49 AM, in article 47e3bffd@linux, "Mr. Simplicity" >>>>>>>>><noway@jose.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Isn't this cute? >>>>>>>>>> http://markhumphrys.com/left.islamic.html >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> This one is the kicker though, and elucidates my periodic rants >>better >>>>>>>> than >>>>>>>>>> I do: >>>>>>>>>> http://dineshdsouza.com/books/enemy-intro.html >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Our economy is gonna bounce along the bottom for a while. This >wasn't >>>>>>>>>> necessary. Now I hear the Democrats starting to harp on the economy >>>>>>and >>>>>>>> tie >>>>>>>>>> it ti Iraq. there is, most definitely, a connection. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> http://drsanity.blogspot.com/2007/04/selfless-narcissism.htm l >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> and the following excerpt is something I've been ranting about >here >>>>>>and >>>>>>>>>> elsewhere for years: >>>>>>>>>> The Democrats and their glorious leaders, who have become so >>>>>>>>>> narcissistically invested in this country's defeat as a political >>>> >>>>>>>>>> strategy >>>>>>>>>> to accumulate power and "restore American honor", that they >>>>>>>>>> have--wittingly >>>>>>>>>> or unwittingly--decided to sell their countrymen out to the very >>>enemy >>>>>>>> they >>>>>>>>>> are currently fighting. They mean well, of course. They do it for >>>>those >>>>>>>>>> wonderful 'selfless' reasons--like "peace" and "social justice" >>and >>>>>>all. >>>>>>>>>> They really support the troops . >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Let's just ignore the fact that they bear considerable responsibility >>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>>> the ongoing violence and death of our troops as they enable and >> >>>>>>>>>> encourage >>>>>>>>>> the priorities of the enemy. Why should the terrorists alter their >>>>> >>>>>>>>>> homicidal >>>>>>>>>> behavior? It is working! People like Nancy Pelosi are living proof >>>>>of >>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>> effectiveness of their strategy. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> There really is a problem. It's a problem that has been aggravated >>>>>and >>>>>>>>>> encouraged by the left in this country..........you know, the >ones >>>>>>who >>>>>>>>>> don't quite understand that they will be the first to be slaughtered >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> once >>>>>>>>>> they have thrown a wrench in the gears of those who are willing >>to >>>>> >>>>>>>>>> protect >>>>>>>>>> them. They just do not get it. The Islamists parrot the leftist >>American >>>>>>>>>> Imperialist tripe that the leftists love to hear and ascribe to >>this >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> country >>>>>>>>>> but the Islamists do it by design, to dupe the left into helping >>>them >>>>>>>>>> destroy the protectors of the culture that the left hopes to protect >>>>>>by >>>>>>>>>> trying to appease those who will not be appeased until the leftists >>>>>>are >>>>>>&
;>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >Oh, forgot one important thing.... It wasn't men who came up with the "bright idea" to confuse the language, it was Gods. BUT it was mans idea to attempt to build the tower and according to what the Word is all about, they would have succeded if God hadn't interviened with the language confusion. "Steve Cox" <stevec1@charter.net> wrote: > >Rick, I HIGHLY reccomend you crack the book open and read the text for yourself. >You keep coming up with all these goofy things about a tree being a tree >and swinging a cat around... Man... that's all just foolishness. Please, >read it first-THEN bring on the comments. Right now all you are doing is >"babelling" about something you don't know anything about. Read the text.... >It WAS all about all the Babylonians speaking Babalonian. Not a hard concept >to understand. God wanted to break their power of agreement so he confused >the language and no-one understood each other and the progress of the tower >seeced. Why are you fighting such a simple, well known, taught to millions, >established story? You are fortunate that there are (just assuming guys)a >handful of Believers on this Forum who (you may as well face it) won't back >down from the Truth? > >rick <parnell68@hotmail.com> wrote: >>again, i know the story is about language, confusion and other bright >>ideas men come up with. >>sorry, but i have a problem with "men" had one language thing. just >>as i have a problem with god being suprised that adam and eve would >>partake of the forbidden fruit when told no no no you don't. he's >>god...for his sakes... guess he also didn't think of incest when >>populating the earth from just one pair of peeps. i mean cain went to >>the land of nod and eventually married...who...i don't >>know...mom...sis...cousin rita??? >>i believe god was smart enough to create the laws of physics that >>allow certain things to happen under certain conditions and lets the >>chips fall where they may. to me god doesn't kill 250 people on a >>plane and spare one as a lesson of his devine intervention >>capabilities. he doesn't kill half a town yet spares a church so they >>have somewhere to mourn the dead. >>the truely (again to me) sad thing about the differing concepts of god >>is how their used to validate the harm we do each other. >> >> >>On 22 Mar 2008 00:13:36 +1000, "Steve Cox" <<a href="mailto:stevec1@cha
? How am I a hypocrite? Ask questions? >>>>>>My >>>>>>first post was nothing but questions. Having the guts to stand up for >>>>>>what you believe in with integrity, honor and respect, but without any >>>>pansy, >>>>>>pacifist whining and hiding behind labels and stereotypes". are serious? >>>>>>Why did it take so long for every man to have the right same rights? >>Is'nt >>>>>>that something we were suppose to believe in? Honor? respect? Look,do'nt >>>>>>get >>>>>>made at me or anyone that confronts you with the truth. I love this >country >>>>>>just as much as you. If I can say that with your permission. But we >>>>>>have alot of work to do. We want to blame everyone else for are problems.(not >>>>>>to say we are the cause of all the problems) Think what you want about >>>>my >>>>>>credibility,my words can stand on there own! This makes them no less >>true >>>>>> >>>>>>"Dedric Terry" <dt@noreply.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Before you pass judgement, make ill-informed assumptions and become >>a >>>>hypocrit >>>>>>>yourself, read the context, ask questions, and attempt to actually >understand >>>>>>>other people. You just read a single word and extrapolated that into >>>>left >>>>>>>field. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>This had nothing to do with race. You might has well launched off >a >>>diatribe >>>>>>>on the problems with meteor storms on Pluto. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>And in case you were wondering, by "fabric" I meant guts to stand up >>>for >>>>>>>what you believe in with integrity, honor and respect, but without >any >>>>>pansy, >>>>>>>pacifist whining and hiding behind labels and stereotypes. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Btw - posting like this without your real name is cowardly and destroys >>>>>>any >>>>>>>credibility to your opinion, but at least it supports my argument in >>>spades. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>"Yah" <Blah@ya-ya.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Listen, >>>>>>>>My comments are not about the article,I'm not defending the left. >I >>>just >>>>>>>>find the statement "the fabric of are country" to be bullshit. We >forget >>>>>>>>about >>>>>>>>are past and pass judgement on others. This is the self-righteousness >>>>>I >>>>>>>speak >>>>>>>>of. As to why I do not post my name? Because of the self-righteousness >>>>>>I >>>>>>>>speak >>>>>>>>of. Wake up! Clean up your backyard. Playing the race card? It could'nt >>>>>>>be >>>>>>>>played if racism was'nt true and alive today! You may look at my >comments >>>>>>>>as detour >>>>>>>>into left field,but my comments are directed at your comment about >>the >>>>>>"fabric" >>>>>>>>of are country. The truth is almost all the founding fathers were >slave >>>>>>>owners,and >>>>>>>>some only freed their slaves after they died. Now there is one thing >>>>I >>>>>>agree >>>>>>>>on >>>>>>>>with you is that this place has gone way down! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>"Dedric Terry" <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>And, btw - I can't believe anyone would even dare to post such racist >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>propaganda as this >>>>>>>>>(and that's exactly what it is) when the original post was on radical >>>>>>islam, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>not slavery. Simply amazing. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>This forum really has lost it. I'm out. I've really had enough >of >>>>these >>>>>>>>>far fetched bizarre reactions and detours into left field. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>"YAH" <bla-bla@yah.com> wrote in message news:47e3dde1$1@linux... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The fabric of are nation? What is that? Salvery? segragation? >racisim? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>> KKK? >>>>>>>>>> self-righteousness! >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Dedric Terry <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>I've heard two separate commentaries (one a major news agency, >the >>>>>other >>>>>>>>>> a >>>>>>>>>>>Brit's personal rant) about how the UK is catering to the whims >>of >>>>>Islam >>>>>>>>>> - >>>>>>>>>>>they've restricted the use of the Three Little Pigs story in some >>>>schools. >>>>>>>>>>>England is funding Islamic schools for their Muslim citizens. >They >>>>>>are >>>>>>>>>>>considering passing Islamic laws in some areas to appease that >community >>>>>>>>>>>(these were echoed in both, separate and independent commentaries >>>>- >>>>>>two >>>>>>>>>>>completely different viewpoints seeing the same thing happen). > >>In >>>>>effect, >>>>>>>>>>>the UK is making concessions right and left and getting nothing >>in >>>>>return >>>>>>>>>> - >>>>>>>>>>>just more demands. Forget their own history, people and culture, >>>>just >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>give >>>>>>>>>>>up in the face of fear of suicide bombers, sarin gas, and extremist >>>>>>>>>>>protests. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>The news agency report basically said exactly what you are DJ - >>the >>>>>>US >>>>>>>>is >>>>>>>>>>>doing the same thing - bowing down and letting our "pacifist" leftwing >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>veil >>>>>>>>>>>of "peace" and "equality" and "justice" dupe us into giving up >those >>>>>>>very >>>>>>>>>>>ideals, playing right into the hands of extremism and even terrorism. >>>>>>>>>>>That's the paradox that's become our country. And this is just >>one >>>>>>case >>>>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>>>>>how the left is ironically proposing and touting exactly the opposite >>>>>>>>of >>>>>>>>>>>what is the fabric of our country. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>DT >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>On 3/21/08 7:49 AM, in article 47e3bffd@linux, "Mr. Simplicity" >>>>>>>>>>><noway@jose.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Isn't this cute? >>>>>>>>>>>> http://markhumphrys.com/left.islamic.html<br
>>>>>>>>> than >>>>>>>>>>>> I do: >>>>>>>>>>>> http://dineshdsouza.com/books/enemy-intro.html >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Our economy is gonna bounce along the bottom for a while. This >>>wasn't >>>>>>>>>>>> necessary. Now I hear the Democrats starting to harp on the economy >>>>>>>>and >>>>>>>>>> tie >>>>>>>>>>>> it ti Iraq. there is, most definitely, a connection. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> http://drsanity.blogspot.com/2007/04/selfless-narcissism.htm l >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> and the following excerpt is something I've been ranting about >>>here >>>>>>>>and >>>>>>>>>>>> elsewhere for years: >>>>>>>>>>>> The Democrats and their glorious leaders, who have become so >>>>>>>>>>>> narcissistically invested in this country's defeat as a political >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> strategy >>>>>>>>>>>> to accumulate power and "restore American honor", that they >>>>>>>>>>>> have--wittingly >>>>>>>>>>>> or unwittingly--decided to sell their countrymen out to the very >>>>>enemy >>>>>>>>>> they >>>>>>>>>>>> are currently fighting. They mean well, of course. They do it >>for >>>>>>those >>>>>>>>>>>> wonderful 'selfless' reasons--like "peace" and "social justice" >>>>and >>>>>>>>all. >>>>>>>>>>>> They really support the troops . >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Let's just ignore the fact that they bear considerable responsibility >>>>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>>>>> the ongoing violence and death of our troops as they enable and >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> encourage >>>>>>>>>>>> the priorities of the enemy. Why should the terrorists alter >their >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> homicidal >>>>>>>>>>>> behavior? It is working! People like Nancy Pelosi are living >proof >>>>>>>of >>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>> effectiveness of their strategy. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> There really is a problem. It's a problem that has been aggravated >>>>>>>and >>>>>>>>>>>> encouraged by the left in this country..........you know, the >>>ones >>>>>>>>who >>>>>>>>>>>> don't quite understand that they will be the first to be slaughtered >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> once >>>>>>>>>>>> they have thrown a wrench in the gears of those who are willing >>>>to >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> protect >>>>>>>>>>>> them. They just do not get it. The Islamists parrot the leftist >>>>American >>>>>>>>>>>> Imperialist tripe that the leftists love to hear and ascribe >to >>>>this >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> country >>>>>>>>>>>> but the Islamists do it by design, to dupe the left into helping >>>>>them >>>>>>>>>>>> destroy the protectors of the culture that the left hopes to >protect >>>>>>>>by >>>>>>>>>>>> trying to appease those who will not be appeased until the leftists >>>>>>>>are >>>>>>>>>>>> either dead or are kneeling toward Mecca. Once it is too late, >>>they >>>>>>>>can >>>>>>>>>> then >>>>>>>>>>>> whine about how pissed off they are that there's no separation >>>between >>>>>>>>>>>> mosque and state...right before they are separated from their >>heads. >>>>>>>>I >>>>>>>>>>>> recognized it years ago. So did lots of other people.....funny, >>>>I >>>>>>didn't >>>>>>>>>>>> hear a peep out of OBama though. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> OK......now I'm of to rape the land. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> bye. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >That's why we love you Lamont! LaMont wrote: > Hey Hey.. I logged on. I'm offended that you would think that I posted that > "YA" stuff. I always put my name on my post with my real email address. I > have nothing to hide.. > > "James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote: >> Do you really want to ruin Good Friday LaMont? >> >> "James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote: >>> Why don't you start a new thread and we can throw down there? >>> >>> "yah" <Blah@ya-ya.com> wrote: >>>> Why do yoy think that your opinion is the right one? Are you saying that >>> this >>>> country >>>> was'nt built on the backs of slavery? How am I a hypocrite? Ask questions? >>>> My >>>> first post was nothing but questions. Having the guts to stand up for >>>> what you believe in with integrity, honor and respect, but without any >> pansy, >>>> pacifist whining and hiding behind labels and stereotypes". are serious? >>>> Why did it take so long for every man to have the right same rights? Is'nt >>>> that something we were suppose to believe in? Honor? respect? Look,do'nt >>>> get >>>> made at me or anyone that confronts you with the truth. I love this country >>>> just as much as you. If I can say that with your permission. But we >>>> have alot of work to do. We want to blame everyone else for are problems.(not >>>> to say we are the cause of all the problems) Think what you want about >> my >>>> credibility,my words can stand on there own! This makes them no less true >>>> >>>> "Dedric Terry" <dt@noreply.com> wrote: >>>>> Before you pass judgement, make ill-informed assumptions and become a >> hypocrit >>>>> yourself, read the context, ask questions, and attempt to actually understand >>>>> other people. You just read a single word and extrapolated that into >> left >>>>> field. >>>>> >>>>> This had nothing to do with race. You might has well launched off a > diatribe >>>>> on the problems with meteor storms on Pluto. >>>>> >>>>> And in case you were wondering, by "fabric" I meant guts to stand up > for >>>>> what you believe in with integrity, honor and respect, but without any >>> pansy, >>>>> pacifist whining and hiding behind labels and stereotypes. >>>>> >>>>> Btw - posting like this without your real name is cowardly and destroys >>>> any >>>>> credibility to your opinion, but at least it supports my argument in > spades. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> "Yah" <Blah@ya-ya.com> wrote: >>>>>> Listen, >>>>>> My comments are not about the article,I'm not defending the left. I > just >>>>>> find the statement "the fabric of are country" to be bullshit. We forget >>>>>> about >>>>>> are past and pass judgement on others. This is the self-righteousness >>> I >>>>> speak >>>>>> of. As to why I do not post my name? Because of the self-righteousness >>>> I >>>>>> speak >>>>>> of. Wake up! Clean up your backyard. Playing the race card? It could'nt >>>>> be >>>>>> played if racism was'nt true and alive today! You may look at my comments >>>>>> as detour >>>>>> into left field,but my comments are directed at your comment about the >>>> "fabric" >>>>>> of are country. The truth is almost all the founding fathers were slave >>>>> owners,and >>>>>> some only freed their slaves after they died. Now there is one thing >> I >>>> agree >>>>>> on >>>>>> with you is that this place has gone way down! >>>>>> >>>>>> "Dedric Terry" <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote: >>>>>>> And, btw - I can't believe anyone would even dare to post such racist >>>>>>> propaganda as this >
;>>>>> I do: >>>>>>>>>>>> http://dineshdsouza.com/books/enemy-intro.html >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Our economy is gonna bounce along the bottom for a while. This >>>wasn't >>>>>>>>>>>> necessary. Now I hear the Democrats starting to harp on the economy >>>>>>>>and >>>>>>>>>> tie >>>>>>>>>>>> it ti Iraq. there is, most definitely, a connection. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> http://drsanity.blogspot.com/2007/04/selfless-narcissism.htm l >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> and the following excerpt is something I've been ranting about >>>here >>>>>>>>and >>>>>>>>>>>> elsewhere for years: >>>>>>>>>>>> The Democrats and their glorious leaders, who have become so >>>>>>>>>>>> narcissistically invested in this country's defeat as a political >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> strategy >>>>>>>>>>>> to accumulate power and "restore American honor", that they >>>>>>>>>>>> have--wittingly >>>>>>>>>>>> or unwittingly--decided to sell their countrymen out to the very >>>>>enemy >>>>>>>>>> they >>>>>>>>>>>> are currently fighting. They mean well, of course. They do it >>for >>>>>>those >>>>>>>>>>>> wonderful 'selfless' reasons--like "peace" and "social justice" >>>>and >>>>>>>>all. >>>>>>>>>>>> They really support the troops . >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Let's just ignore the fact that they bear considerable responsibility >>>>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>>>>> the ongoing violence and death of our troops as they enable and >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> encourage >>>>>>>>>>>> the priorities of the enemy. Why should the terrorists alter >their >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> homicidal >>>>>>>>>>>> behavior? It is working! People like Nancy Pelosi are living >proof >>>>>>>of >>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>> effectiveness of their strategy. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> There really is a problem. It's a problem that has been aggravated >>>>>>>and >>>>>>>>>>>> encouraged by the left in this country..........you know, the >>>ones >>>>>>>>who >>>>>>>>>>>> don't quite understand that they will be the first to be slaughtered >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> once >>>>>>>>>>>> they have thrown a wrench in the gears of those who are willing >>>>to >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> protect >>>>>>>>>>>> them. They just do not get it. The Islamists parrot the leftist >>>>American >>>>>>>>>>>> Imperialist tripe that the leftists love to hear and ascribe >to >>>>this >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> country >>>>>>>>>>>> but the Islamists do it by design, to dupe the left into helping >>>>>them >>>>>>>>>>>> destroy the protectors of the culture that the left hopes to >protect >>>>>>>>by >>>>>>>>>>>> trying to appease those who will not be appeased until the leftists >>>>>>>>are >>>>>>>>>>>> either dead or are kneeling toward Mecca. Once it is too late, >>>they >>>>>>>>can >>>>>>>>>> then >>>>>>>>>>>> whine about how pissed off they are that there's no separation >>>between >>>>>>>>>>>> mosque and state...right before they are separated from their >>heads. >>>>>>>>I >>>>>>>>>>>> recognized it years ago. So did lots of other people.....funny, >>>>I >>>>>>didn't >>>>>>>>>>>> hear a peep out of OBama though. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> OK......now I'm of to rape the land. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> bye. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >Look at the facts, use your brains, read the reports. crunch the numbers. It's not a left or right thing, it's not a concpiracy. Now is the time for intelligent people to step up to the plate. This is the real challenge of our generation. The next generations will judge us by this. Bjorn R "James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:47e40fb3@linux... > > The science is about money. The science of man made global warming being > a major factor is bullshit, and it is not provable. Has the earth heated > up a bit, yes, the earth goes threw changes. Should we as people stop polluting, > yes. Should we conserve, yes, I'm a conservative, not a liberal. Am I buying > in to the liberal's sin tax plan their trying to convince the dummies to > start paying to save the world, NO WAY! I'm I buying in the this trilateralist > plan to shift more money out of the USA, no way! Back in the 70's, the scientist > that started this global warming stuff, was predicting that we would be in > an ice age right now. > > You can post all of the contrived research you, it won't change the truth. > Choose to believe what you want, man made global warming has not been proven. > > > Jamie K <Meta@Dimensional.com> wrote: > > > >Wish it were that easy, James. We would be poor stewards of the land > >indeed if we carelessly dismissed the evidence to date. It's not > >particularly prudent to ignore increasing evidence that shows possible > >problems. > > > >The atmosphere and our use of it to store increasing amounts of unwanted > > >greenhouse gases is a big enough subject scientifically without being > >sidetracked by political and economic conspiracy theories. > > > >Even if you enjoy discussing perceived conspiracies, be sure you don't > >confuse them with the ongoing science. > > > >Cheers, > > -Jamie > > www.JamieKrutz.com > > > > > >James McCloskey wrote: > >> What we need is waders and a big shovel to get rid of this load of crap. > > >> > >> > >> "BR" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote: > >>> The humanity is facing it's biggest disaster in 100 000 years. Tax raises > >>> won't solve anything, it demand a lot more action than that.. > >>> BR > >>> > >>> "James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote in message > >>> news:47e2cfc2$1@linux... > >>>> This is what i've been saying. When Al Gore buys global offsets for > ten > >>> cents > >>>> and sells them for a dollar, it's a big bunch of money making bullshit! > >>>> Now this trilateralist bureaucrat bunch of SOBs are going to try to > make > >>>> it a sin tax that we will all have to pay. You know once the government > >>>> gets a tax passed through they will never repeal it. We will be paying > >> it > >>>> for then on! It's a scare tactic to cow the people in to believing > this > >>>> bunch of bullshit. There is no significant man made global warming, > it's > >>>> a lie to shift the wealth out of the United States while these rats > and > >>> their > >>>> friends get wealthy doing it. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> "Mr. Simplicity" <noway@jose.net> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> http://blog.mlive.com/annarbornews/2007/09/dingell_global_wa rming_may_req.h > >>> tml > >>>>> This is the biggest load of disingenuous hubris I've seen in a while. > >>> More > >>>>> hypocracy. Whether you get it or not, your intelligence has just been > >>>>> insulted and be assured that what this is really all about it preparing > >>>> you > >>>>> to be bent over as consumption falls. Expect more of this BS as gas > usage > >>>>> goes down and therefore the tax revenue that a gallon of gas generates > >> is > >>>>> proportionately reduced. To make up for the revenue shortfall, we're > >>> going > >>>>> to get taxed into oblivion......
an made global warming being >> a major factor is bullshit, and it is not provable. Has the earth heated >> up a bit, yes, the earth goes threw changes. Should we as people stop >polluting, >> yes. Should we conserve, yes, I'm a conservative, not a liberal. Am I >buying >> in to the liberal's sin tax plan their trying to convince the dummies to >> start paying to save the world, NO WAY! I'm I buying in the this >trilateralist >> plan to shift more money out of the USA, no way! Back in the 70's, the >scientist >> that started this global warming stuff, was predicting that we would be in >> an ice age right now. >> >> You can post all of the contrived research you, it won't change the truth. >> Choose to believe what you want, man made global warming has not been >proven. >> >> >> Jamie K <Meta@Dimensional.com> wrote: >> > >> >Wish it were that easy, James. We would be poor stewards of the land >> >indeed if we carelessly dismissed the evidence to date. It's not >> >particularly prudent to ignore increasing evidence that shows possible >> >problems. >> > >> >The atmosphere and our use of it to store increasing amounts of unwanted >> >> >greenhouse gases is a big enough subject scientifically without being >> >sidetracked by political and economic conspiracy theories. >> > >> >Even if you enjoy discussing perceived conspiracies, be sure you don't >> >confuse them with the ongoing science. >> > >> >Cheers, >> > -Jamie >> > www.JamieKrutz.com >> > >> > >> >James McCloskey wrote: >> >> What we need is waders and a big shovel to get rid of this load of >crap. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> "BR" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote: >> >>> The humanity is facing it's biggest disaster in 100 000 years. Tax >raises >> >>> won't solve anything, it demand a lot more action than that.. >> >>> BR >> >>> >> >>> "James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote in message >> >>> news:47e2cfc2$1@linux... >> >>>> This is what i've been saying. When Al Gore buys global offsets for >> ten >> >>> cents >> >>>> and sells them for a dollar, it's a big bunch of money making >bullshit! >> >>>> Now this trilateralist bureaucrat bunch of SOBs are going to try to >> make >> >>>> it a sin tax that we will all have to pay. You know once the >government >> >>>> gets a tax passed through they will never repeal it. We will be >paying >> >> it >> >>>> for then on! It's a scare tactic to cow the people in to believing >> this >> >>>> bunch of bullshit. There is no significant man made global warming, >> it's >> >>>> a lie to shift the wealth out of the United States while these rats >> and >> >>> their >> >>>> friends get wealthy doing it. >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> "Mr. Simplicity" <noway@jose.net> wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>> > http://blog.mlive.com/annarbornews/2007/09/dingell_global_wa rming_may_req.h >> >>> tml >> >>>>> This is the biggest load of disingenuous hubris I've seen in a >while. >> >>> More >> >>>>> hypocracy. Whether you get it or not, your intelligence has just >been >> >>>>> insulted and be assured that what this is really all about it >preparing >> >>>> you >> >>>>> to be bent over as consumption falls. Expect more of this BS as gas >> usage >> >>>>> goes down and therefore the tax revenue that a gallon of gas >generates >> >> is >> >>>>> proportionately reduced. To make up for the revenue shortfall, we're >> >>> going >> >>>>> to get taxed into oblivion........and I was even sorta' thinking >about >> >>>>> voting for a Democrat for president. The new forumla for the >American >> >>>>> economy is to tax businesses more so that they will continue to go >> >>> elsewhere >> >>>>> while screwing the workers who will be losing their jobs. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Gimme some of that. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>> >> >> >> > >James McCloskey wrote: > The science is about money. To an extent everything is about money. But that doesn't stop people from doing good, conscientious work. You yourself require money to live. Should we therefore disbelieve everything you say? No, I don't think so. That argument is really reaching. > The science of man made global warming being > a major factor is bullshit, and it is not provable. LOL. The science is hardly bullshit. What scientists are saying is that there is a strong chance that human contributions to greenhouse gases are affecting the climate. This is because we are dumping large and increasing amounts of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere, above and beyond current natural cycles. Gases that then stay in the atmosphere for extended periods, decades or more. Keep in mind that greenhouse gases help regulate temperature on earth by reflecting back infrared radiation. This is a good thing for our survival but it can be overdone. Since only a tiny fraction of the gases in the atmosphere reflect infrared radiation (nitrogen and oxygen don't), it doesn't take much of an increase in greenhouse gases to noticeably change the amount of heat directed back toward the earth. There is strong evidence that this is what is happening now, and that our contributions are part of the problem. Based on what we know so far there is a strong chance this problem will increase over time. Given that information, it's smart to consider the implications now. > Has the earth heated > up a bit, yes, the earth goes threw changes. True, and true. And evidence indicates there's a good chance we're involved in the current climate change event. > Should we as people stop polluting, > yes. We certainly need to be aware of the chemistry around us and how we interact with it. The ozone situation is a good example. Scientists noticed a change in the ozone layer. A human chemical cause was discovered. Policies were changed to stop human contributions to the problem. > Should we conserve, yes, I'm a conservative, not a liberal. Great. To conserve what we have we need to take into account any evidence that shows we may have a problem. BTW climate change and conservation are not a partisan issues, in my view. At the very least, most people don't want to screw up the area where they live, no matter their politics. > Am I buying > in to the liberal's sin tax plan their trying to convince the dummies to > start paying to save the world, NO WAY! That's fine. But don't confuse any perceived conspiracies with ongoing climate science. You can promote your political views without attacking climate scientists or dismissing scientific conclusions. > I'm I buying in the this trilateralist > plan to shift more money out of the USA, no way! That's fine. But again you can promote your political views without attacking climate scientists or dismissing scientific conclusions. > Back in the 70's, the scientist > that started this global warming stuff, was predicting that we would be in > an ice age right now. Who are you talking about? > You can post all of the contrived research you, it won't change the truth. > Choose to believe what you want, man made global warming has not been proven. If someone is exploiting scientific data in a partisan way to push a certain point of view you happen to disagree with, then fine, argue with them. But don't pretend the data itself doesn't exist. There is a lot of peer-reviewed research out there, and it isn't "contrived." If the only way to "prove" your point is to continue a risky worldwide experiment until we possibly screw up the planet for future generations, then your proof is too late to be in any way useful. It's much smarter to look at the decades of evidence we already have and make prudent risk management decisions. Cheers, -Jamie www.JamieKrutz.com > Jamie K <Meta@Dimensional.com> wrote: >> Wish it were that easy, James. We would be poor stewards of the land >> indeed if we carelessly dismissed the evidence to date. It's not >> particularly prudent to ignore increasing evidence that shows possible >> problems. >> >> The atmosphere and our use of it to store increasing amounts of unwanted > >> greenhouse gases is a big enough subject scientifically without being >> sidetracked by political and economic conspiracy theories. >> >> Even if you enjoy discussing perceived conspiracies, be sure you don't >> confuse them with the ongoing science. >> >> Cheers, >> -Jamie >> www.JamieKrutz.com >> >> >> James McCloskey wrote: >>> What we need is waders and a big shovel to get rid of this load of crap. > >>> >>> "BR" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote: >>>> The humanity is facing it's biggest disaster in 100 000 years. Tax raises >>>> won't solve anything, it demand a lot more action than that.. >>>> BR >>>> >>>> "James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote in message >>>> news:47e2cfc2$1@linux... >>>>> This is what i've been saying. When Al Gore buys global offsets for > ten >>>> cents >>>>> and sells them for a dollar, it's a big bunch of money making bullshit! >>>>> Now this trilateralist bureaucrat bunch of SOBs are going to try to > make >>>>> it a sin tax that we will all have to pay. You know once the government >>>>> gets a tax passed through they will never repeal it. We will be paying >>> it >>>>> for then on! It's a scare tactic to cow the people in to believing > this >>>>> bunch of bullshit. There is no significant man made global warming, > it's >>>>> a lie to shift the wealth out of the United States while these rats > and >>>> their >>>>> friends get wealthy doing it. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> "Mr. Simplicity" <noway@jose.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> <a href="http://blog.mlive.com/
..and I was even sorta' thinking about > >>>>> voting for a Democrat for president. The new forumla for the American > >>>>> economy is to tax businesses more so that they will continue to go > >>> elsewhere > >>>>> while screwing the workers who will be losing their jobs. > >>>>> > >>>>> Gimme some of that. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>> > >> >What Bullshit American history do you speak of? "LaMont" <jjdpro@gmail.com> wrote: > >Sorry about they typos. I'm on my treo. > >"LaMOnt" <jjdpro@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>James, what is the race thing?Really? What is the race thing. ?? I think >you >>come in here daily, I might add, with your right-winged off the wall, bull-shit >>,rhetoric...Please stop posting such BS!@# and doe yourself a favor a nd >>study up on REAL AMERICAN HISTORY, not that Bull-shit you think you now >and >>was taught in school... >> >>"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote: >>> >>
>"yah" <blah@ya-ya.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>I'm not Lamont.....Christ dying today could'nt get worse. I never understood >>>>how >>>>Christ dying was good,maybe it should have been Sad friday. >>> >>>Ok, LaMont usually goes off on the race thing, and he often has type-Os, >>>my mistake. As far as Christ dyeing on the cross, it is sad, it is also >>>something to be glad about and celebrate. If you under stood Christianity >>>you would understand that. >>>> >>>>"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>Do you really want to ruin Good Friday LaMont? >>>>> >>>>>"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>Why don't you start a new thread and we can throw down there? >>>>>> >>>>>>"yah" <Blah@ya-ya.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Why do yoy think that your opinion is the right one? Are you saying >>that >>>>>>this >>>>>>>country >>>>>>>was'nt built on the backs of slavery? How am I a hypocrite? Ask questions? >>>>>>>My >>>>>>>first post was nothing but questions. Having the guts to stand up for >>>>>>>what you believe in with integrity, honor and respect, but without >any >>>>>pansy, >>>>>>>pacifist whining and hiding behind labels and stereotypes". are serious? >>>>>>>Why did it take so long for every man to have the right same rights? >>>Is'nt >>>>>>>that something we were suppose to believe in? Honor? respect? Look,do'nt >>>>>>>get >>>>>>>made at me or anyone that confronts you with the truth. I love this >>country >>>>>>>just as much as you. If I can say that with your permission. But we >>>>>>>have alot of work to do. We want to blame everyone else for are problems.(not >>>>>>>to say we are the cause of all the problems) Think what you want about >>>>>my >>>>>>>credibility,my words can stand on there own! This makes them no less >>>true >>>>>>> >>>>>>>"Dedric Terry" <dt@noreply.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Before you pass judgement, make ill-informed assumptions and become >>>a >>>>>hypocrit >>>>>>>>yourself, read the context, ask questions, and attempt to actually >>understand >>>>>>>>other people. You just read a single word and extrapolated that into >>>>>left >>>>>>>>field. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>This had nothing to do with race. You might has well launched off >>a >>>>diatribe >>>>>>>>on the problems with meteor storms on Pluto. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>And in case you were wondering, by "fabric" I meant guts to stand >up >>>>for >>>>>>>>what you believe in with integrity, honor and respect, but without >>any >>>>>>pansy, >>>>>>>>pacifist whining and hiding behind labels and stereotypes. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Btw - posting like this without your real name is cowardly and destroys >>>>>>>any >>>>>>>>credibility to your opinion, but at least it supports my argument >in >>>>spades. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>"Yah" <Blah@ya-ya.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>Listen, >>>>>>>>>My comments are not about the article,I'm not defending the left. >>I >>>>just >>>>>>>>>find the statement "the fabric of are country" to be bullshit. We >>forget >>>>>>>>>about >>>>>>>>>are past and pass judgement on others. This is the self-righteousness >>>>>>I >>>>>>>>speak >>>>>>>>>of. As to why I do not post my name? Because of the self-righteousness >>>>>>>I >>>>>>>>>speak >>>>>>>>>of. Wake up! Clean up your backyard. Playing the race card? It could'nt >>>>>>>>be >>>>>>>>>played if racism was'nt true and alive today! You may look at my >>comments >>>>>>>>>as detour >>>>>>>>>into left field,but my comments are directed at your comment about >>>the >>>>>>>"fabric" >>>>>>>>>of are country. The truth is almost all the founding fathers were >>slave >>>>>>>>owners,and >>>>>>>>>some only freed their slaves after they died. Now there is one thing >>>>>I >>>>>>>agree >>>>>>>>>on >>>>>>>>>with you is that this place has gone way down! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>"Dedric Terry" <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>And, btw - I can't believe anyone would even dare to post such racist >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>propaganda as this >>>>>>>>>>(and that's exactly what it is) when the original post was on radical >>>>>>>islam, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>not slavery. Simply amazing. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>This forum really has lost it. I'm out. I've really had enough >>of >>>>>these >>>>>>>>>>far fetched bizarre reactions and detours into left field. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>"YAH" <bla-bla@yah.com> wrote in message news:47e3dde1$1@linux... >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> The fabric of are nation? What is that? Salvery? segragation? >>racisim? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>> KKK? >>>>>>>>>>> self-righteousness! >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Dedric Terry <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>I've heard two separate commentaries (one a major news agency, >>the >>>>>>other >>>>>>>>>>> a >>>>>>>>>>>>Brit's personal rant) about how the UK is catering to the whims >>>of >>>>>>Islam >>>>>>>>>>> - >>>>>>>>>>>>they've restricted the use of the Three Little Pigs story in some >>>>>schools. >>>>>>>>>>>>England is funding Islamic schools for their Muslim citizens. > >>They >>>>>>>are >>>>>>>>>>>>considering passing Islamic laws in some areas to appease that >>community >>>>>>>>>>>>(these were echoed in both, separate and independent commentaries >>>>>- >>>>>>>two >>>>>>>>>>>>completely different viewpoints seeing the same thing happen). >> >>>In >>>>>>effect, >>>>>>>>>>>>the UK is making concessions right and left and getting nothing >>>in >>>>>>return >>>>>>>>>>> - >>>>>>>>>>>>just more demands. Forget their own history, people and culture, >>>>>just >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>give >>>>>>>>>>>>up in the face of fear of suicide bombers, sarin gas, and extremist >>>>>>>>>>>>protests. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>The news agency report basically said exactly what you are DJ >- >>>the >>>>>>>US >>>>>>>>>is >>>>>>>>>>>>doing the same thing - bowing down and letting our "pacifist" >leftwing >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>veil >>>>>>>>>>>>of "peace" and "equality" and "justice" dupe us into giving up >>those >>>>>>>>very >>>>>>>>>>>>ideals, playing right into the hands of extremism and even terrorism. >>>>>>>>>>>>That's the paradox that's become our country. And this is just >>>one >>>>>>>case >>>>>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>>>>>>how the left is ironically proposing and touting exactly the opposite >>>>>>>>>of >>>>>>>>>>>>what is the fabric of our country. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>DT >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>On 3/21/08 7:49 AM, in article 47e3bffd@linux, "Mr. Simplicity" >>>>>>>>>>>><noway@jose.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Isn't this cute? >>>>>>>>>>>>> http://markhumphrys.com/left.islamic.html >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> This one is the kicker though, and elucidates my periodic rants >>>>>better >>>>>>>>>>> than >>>>>>>>>>>>> I do: >>>>>>>>>>>>> http://dineshdsouza.com/books/enemy-intro.html >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Our economy is gonna bounce along the bottom for a while. This >>>>wasn't >>>>>>>>>>>>> necessary. Now I hear the Democrats starting to harp on the >economy >>>>>>>>>and >>>>>>>>>>> tie >>>>>>>>>>>>> it ti Iraq. there is, most definitely, a connection. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> http://drsanity.blogspot.com/2007/04/selfless-narcissism.htm l >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> and the following excerpt is something I've been ranting about >>>>here >>>>>>>>>and >>>>>>>>>>>>> elsewhere for years: >>>>>>>>>>>>> The Democrats and their glorious leaders, who have become so >>>>>>>>>>>>> narcissistically invested in this country's defeat as a political >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> strategy >>>>>>>>>>>>> to accumulate power and "restore American honor", that they > >>>>>>>>>>>>> have--wittingly >>>>>>>>>>>>> or unwittingly--decided to sell their countrymen out to the >very >>>>>>enemy >>>>>>>>>>> they >>>>>>>>>>>>> are currently fighting. They mean well, of course. They do it >>>for >>>>>>>those >>>>>>>>>>>>> wonderful 'selfless' reasons--like "peace" and "social justice" >>>>>and >>>>>>>>>all. >>>>>>>>>>>>> They really support the troops . >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Let's just ignore the fact that they bear considerable responsibility >>>>>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>>>>>> the ongoing violence and death of our troops as they enable >and >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> encourage >>>>>>>>>>>>> the priorities of the enemy. Why should the terrorists alter >>their >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> homicidal >>>>>>>>>>>>> behavior? It is working! People like Nancy Pelosi are living >>proof >>>>>>>>of >>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>> effectiveness of their strategy. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> There really is a problem. It's a problem that has been aggravated >>>>>>>>and >>>>>>>>>>>>> encouraged by the left in this country..........you know, the >>>>ones >>>>>>>>>who >>>>>>>>>>>>> don't quite understand that they will be the first to be slaughtered >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> once >>>>>>>>>>>>> they have thrown a wrench in the gears of those who are willing >>>>>to >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> protect >>>>>>>>>>>>> them. They just do not get it. The Islamists parrot the leftist >>>>>American >>>>>>>>>>>>> Imperialist tripe that the leftists love to hear and ascribe >>to >>>>>this >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> country >>>>>>>>>>>>> but the Islamists do it by design, to dupe the left into helping >>>>>>them >>>>>>>>>>>>> destroy the protectors of the culture that the left hopes to >>protect >>>>>>>>>by >>>>>>>>>>>>> trying to appease those who will not be appeased until the leftists >>>>>>>>>are >>>>>>>>>>>>> either dead or are kneeling toward Mecca. Once it is too late, >>>>they >>>>>>>>>can >>>>>>>>>>> then >>>>>>>>>>>>> whine about how pissed off they are that there's no separation >>>>between >>>>>>>>>>>>> mosque and state...right before they are separated from their >>>heads. >>>>>>>>>I >>>>>>>>>>>>> recognized it years ago. So did lots of other people.....funny, >>>>>I >>>>>>>didn't >>>>>>>>>>>>> hear a peep out of OBama though. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> OK......now I'm of to rape the land. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> bye. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >If you repeat something enough times it becomes the truth to some people. Where is the proof? the European space agency has been photographing the polar caps from satellites for years, they say the caps are melting, and then they re freeze and are staying the same over all mass. There is evidence that proves otherwise. "BR" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote: >Look at the facts, use your brains, read the reports. crunch the numbers. >It's not a left or right thing, it's not a concpiracy. Now is the time for >intelligent people to step up to the plate. This is the real challenge of >our generation. The next generations will judge us by this. > >Bjorn R > >"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote in message >news:47e40fb3@linux... >> >> The science is about money. The science of m
intelligence has just been >>>>>> insulted and be assured that what this is really all about it preparing >>>>> you >>>>>> to be bent over as consumption falls. Expect more of this BS as gas > usage >>>>>> goes down and therefore the tax revenue that a gallon of gas generates >>> is >>>>>> proportionately reduced. To make up for the revenue shortfall, we're >>>> going >>&g
an do the same with this. Here's my first site: http://wammoleads.com/default.htmlHell, I wouldn't even send Thad to hell! grin No one has any right to say any of those things. Personally, I believe I am in more danger of hell than someone who lives as an honest atheist all their lives and give Jesus a chance on their deathbed. I cannot pass judgment on anyone's eternal destiny. The question that concerns me this Easter is answering the question of what we would see if we could take a time machine back to Jesus tomb on early Sunday morning after his death. Would we see a bunch of guys stealing a body, or would we see a resurrected Lord and Saviour? None of us is wired so as to not understand the ramifications of either possibility. DC rick <parnell68@hotmail.com> wr
t;>>> to get taxed into oblivion........and I was even sorta' thinking about >>>>>> voting for a Democrat for president. The new forumla for the American >>>>>> economy is to tax businesses more so that they will continue to go >>>> elsewhere >>>>>> while screwing the workers who will be losing their jobs. >>>>>> >>>>>> Gimme some of that. >>>>>> >>>>>> >Purely, mon, dis be de Babylon!<br /
> The last few weeks I've been learning web design, designing a couple sites for my new company. What a trip! I'm a pretty competent graphic designer with the Adobe Creative Suite stuff, but I'm using MS' new Expression Web program, which is cool, but nothing at all like designing for print. Anyway, my mind is slightly overwhelmed most of the time, with brief moments of joy when something miraculously works like I want. There's so much new terminology to learn, and the book I bought is kind of steep (720 pages). I learned graphics by the seat of my pants. I guess I c
ords of some. (not spoken here but lets be >honest out in the real world you can't swing a dead cat and not hit >someone who is willing to tell you that hell, hades, sheol is your >final destination. > >On 22 Mar 2008 02:42:44 +1000, "DC" <dc@spammersinhell.com> wrote: > >> >>Rick, there's some good insights here. How God works is not >>always transparent to us. > >see, now that's where i think the problem lies. god should know that >we're not going to get the message as he wants us to because we're >human and will translate anything to our own advantage. of all the >things to deserve eternal damnation for (if you believe in it) one >would think that the inability to "get it" would not be one of them. > >would you as a parent condemn your child to a never ending life of >torment simply because he or she couldn't understand the totality of >you being "the creator (parent)" of them. you know, it can take only >one gene to make someone either a murderer, saint and everything in >between. so to me a loving, just and forgiving god would have a >better plan then eternal suffering. we on the other hand are more >than willing to threaten and
be in any way useful. > > It's much smarter to look at the decades of evidence we already have and > make prudent risk management decisions. > > Cheers, > -Jamie > www.JamieKrutz.com > > > > > Jamie K <Meta@Dimensional.com> wrote: > >> Wish it were that easy, James. We would be poor stewards of the land > >> indeed if we carelessly dismissed the evidence to date. It's not > >> particularly prudent to ignore increasing evidence that shows possible > >> problems. > >> > >> The atmosphere and our use of it to store increasing amounts of unwanted > > > >> greenhouse gases is a big enough subject scientifically without being > >> sidetracked by political and economic conspiracy theories. > >> > >> Even if you enjoy discussing perceived conspiracies, be sure you don't > >> confuse them with the ongoing science. > >> > >> Cheers, > >> -Jamie > >> www.JamieKrutz.com > >> > >> > >> James McCloskey wrote: > >>> What we need is waders and a big shovel to get rid of this load of crap. > > > >>> > >>> "BR" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote: > >>>> The humanity is facing it's biggest disaster in 100 000 years. Tax raises > >>>> won't solve anything, it demand a lot more action than that.. > >>>> BR<
>view. At the very least, most people don't want to screw up the area >where they live, no matter their politics. > > >> Am I buying >> in to the liberal's sin tax plan their trying to convince the dummies to >> start paying to save the world, NO WAY! > >That's fine. But don't confuse any perceived conspiracies with ongoing >climate science. > >You can promote your political views without attacking climate >scientists or dismissing scientific conc
with it. > > > >The ozone situation is a good example. Scientists noticed a change in > >the ozone layer. A human chemical cause was discovered. Policies were > >changed to stop human contributions to the problem. > > > > > >> Should we conserve, yes, I'm a conservative, not a liberal. > > > >Great. > > > >To conserve what we have we need to take into account any evidence that > > >shows we may have a problem. > > > >BTW climate change and conservation are not a partisan issues, in my > >view. At the very least, most people don't want to screw up the area > >where they live, no matter their politics. > > > > > >> Am I
u're prolly not >>going to get any traction on that Babylonian story". > > >rick <parnell68@hotmail.com> wrote: >>thanks bill. people will believe what they CAN believe more than what >>they're told to believe.. hell, i was raised catholic...school...the >>hole shot and if that didn't work i guess nothing will. according to >>all religious soothsayers "if you don't believe the way we/i do you >>are going to hell" so i guess everyone is. >> >> >> >>On Fri, 21 Mar 2008 15:39:07 -0400, Bill L <bill@billlorentzen.com> >>wrote: >> >>>Steve, I don't think Rick gives a hoot about the story. He is talking >>>about his ideas on god man, trees and swingin' cats. You're prolly not > >>>going to get any traction on that Babylonian story. >>> >>> >>>Steve Cox wrote: >>>> Rick, I HIGHLY reccomend you crack the book open and read the text for >yourself. >>>> You keep coming up with all these goofy things about a tree being a tree >>>> and swinging a cat around... Man... that's all just foolishness. Please, >>>> read it first-THEN bring on the comments. Right now all you are doing >is >>>> "babelling" about something you don't know anything about. Read the text.... >>>&
xcite.com/article/20080321/D8VI2UN0H.html" target="_blank">http://apnews.excite.com/article/20080321/D8VI2UN0H.htmlThe Bull-shit American History I'm talking about is the one that was "taught" in most US schools..Which just happend to leave out and omit certain truths.. "James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote: > >What Bullshit American history do you speak of? > >"LaMont" <jjdpro@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>Sorry about they typos. I'm on my treo. >> >>"LaMOnt" <jjdpro@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>James, what is the race thing?Really? What is the race thing. ?? I think >>you >>>come in here daily, I might add, with your right-winged off the wall, bull-shit >>>,rhetoric...Please stop posting such BS!@# and doe yourself a favor a nd >>>study up on REAL AMERICAN HISTORY, not that Bull-shit you think you now >>and >>>was taught in school... >>> >>>"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>"yah" <blah@ya-ya.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>I'm not Lamont.....Christ dying today could'nt get worse. I never understood >>>>>how >>>>>Christ dying was good,maybe it should have been Sad friday. >>>> >>>>Ok, LaMont usually goes off on the race thing, and he often has type-Os, >>>>my mistake. As far as Christ dyeing on the cross, it is sad, it is also >>>>something to be glad about and celebrate. If you under stood Christianity >>>>you would understand that. >>>>> >>>>>"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>Do you really want to ruin Go
drsanity.blogspot.com/2007/04/selfless-narcissism.html" target="_blank"> http://drsanity.blogspot.com/2007/04/selfless-narcissism.htm l >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> and the following excerpt is something I've been ranting about here >>>>>and >>>>>>>>> elsewhere for years: >>>>>>>>> The Democrats and their glorious leaders, who have become so >>>>>>>>> narcissistically invested in this country's defeat as a political >>> >>>>>>>>> strategy >>>>>>>>> to accumulate power and "restore American honor", that they >>>>>>>>> have--wittingly >>>>>>>>> or unwittingly--decided to sell their countrymen out to the very >>enemy >>>>>>> they >>>>>>>>> are currently fighting. They mean well, of course. They do it for >>>those >>>>>>>>> wonderful 'selfless' reasons--like "peace" and "social justice" >and >>>>>all. >>>>>>>>> They really support the troops . >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Let's just ignore the fact that they bear considerable responsibility >>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>> the ongoing violence and death of our troops as they enable and > >>>>>>>>> encourage >>>>>>>>> the priorities of the enemy. Why should the terrorists alter their >>>> >>>>>>>>> homicidal >>>>>>>>> behavior? It is working! People like Nancy Pelosi are living proof >>>>of >>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>> effectiveness of their strategy. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> There really is a problem. It's a problem that has been aggravated >>>>and >>>>>>>>> encouraged by the left in this country..........you know, the ones >>>>>who >>>>>>>>> don't quite understand that they will be the first to be slaughtered >>>>> >>>>>>>>> once >>>>>>>>> they have thrown a wrench in the gears of those who are willing >to >>>> >>>>>>>>> protect >>>>>>>>> them. They just do not get it. The Islamists parrot the leftist >American >>>>>>>>> Imperialist tripe that the leftists love to hear and ascribe to >this >>>>> >>>>>>>>> country >>>>>>>>> but the Islamists do it by design, to dupe the left into helping >>them >>>>>>>>> destroy the protectors of the culture that the left hopes to protect >>>>>by >>>>>>>>> trying to appease those who will not be appeased until the leftists >>>>>are >>>>>>>>> either dead or are kneeling toward Mecca. Once it is too late, they >>>>>can >>>>>>> then >>>>>>>>> whine about how pissed off they are that there's no separation between >>>>>>>>> mosque and state...right before they are separated from their heads. >>>>>I >>>>>>>>> recognized it years ago. So did lots of other people.....funny, >I >>>didn't >>>>>>>>> hear a peep out of OBama though. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> OK......now I'm of to rape the land. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> bye. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >I'm sure Kim will weigh in with another reminder about where to post what. There's no real reason to start political threads here at all. Just post 'em in the General group to begin with, no notice needed. Anyone here who is interesting in the discussion will find them there. Recently saw two useful rules for getting along in forums: -Thou shalt not post something intended to offend. -Thou shalt not be easily offended. Words of wisdom... Cheers, -Jamie www.JamieKrutz.com Mr. Simplicity wrote: > Yes. I am in favor of this. I think that's sort'a the way Kim had this > figured and I am one of the worst about straying OT. > > I was out of line. > > > "Neil" <OIOI@OI.com> wrote in message news:47e56e2c$1@linux... >> Look, what if we all make a rule... ONLY music-related stuff >> on this section of the NG? Granted, if we made it Paris-only >> topics at this point, there'd be like two posts per week, but >> what if we just said: "anything music-related is cool - all >> other stuff is off-limits", and if someone wants to rant about >> global cooling they can place ONE post here that simply says >> something like "I'm ranting about global cooling over on the >> general group if anyone wants to join in" - ONE post only, no >> responses allowed on this section. >> >> Whaddya think? >> >> ??? >> >> Anyone in favor? >> >> Neil >> >> >> >> "Mr. Simplicity" <noway@jose.net> wrote: >>> >>> >>> "Jamie K" <Meta@Dimensional.com> wrote in message = >>> news:47e5678b$1@linux... >>>> =20 >>>> Mr. Simplicity wrote: >>>>> I deserve to die. >>>> =20 >>>> That's easy enough Deej, when the next "must have or you will die!!" = >>> toy=20 >>>> comes along, just don't buy it. ;^) >>>> =20 >>>> Cheers, >>>> -Jamie >>>> www.JamieKrutz.com >>> I'm really sorry that my posts have led to some folks getting outright = >>> offended and wanting to leave this group. I'm not saying that I disavow >> = >>> my thinking on these issues, but I did make a mistake posting them here. >> = >>> I use Outlook Express to access this group and for some reason, I can = >>> get the General group to work on my computer. There comes a time, = >>> especially with this group of folks, whom I really cherish dispite my = >>> argumentative nature and curmudgeonliness, that the feelings of others, >> = >>> to me, far outweighs my need to express my opinions and stir the pot. I >> = >>> am as passionate about my beliefs as are others with whom I disagree and >> = >>> I feel like I owe those who come here for camaradery and some relief = >> >from the insanity of these times, some major respect, as one of our wise >> = >>> bretheren often mentions. I am sorry that he is leaving and IMO, his = >>> presence here is much more important to me and to this group than my = >>> opinions and rantings. >>> >>> Deej >>> >>> >>> >>> >> charset=3Diso-8859-1"> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> "Jamie K" <<A=20 >>> href=3D"mailto:Meta@Dimensional.com">>> size=3D2>Meta@Dimensional.com> = >>> wrote in=20 >>> message >> size=3D2>news:47e5678b$1@linux>> size=3D2>... >>> > > Mr. Simplicity = >>> wrote: >> I=20 >>> deserve to die. > > That's easy enough Deej, when the next = >>> "must=20 >>> have or you will die!!" toy > comes along, just don't buy it. = >>> ;^) >=20 >>> > Cheers, > -Jamie > <A=20 >>> href=3D"http://www.JamieKrutz.com">>> size=3D2>www.JamieKrutz.com >>> I'm really sorry that my posts have led >> = >>> to some=20 >>> folks getting outright offended and wanting to leave this group. I'm not >> = >>> saying=20 >>> that I disavow my thinking on these issues, but I did make a mistake = >>> posting=20 >>> them here. I use Outlook Express to access this group and for some = >>> reason, I can=20 >>> get the General group to work on my computer. There comes a time, = >>> especially=20 >>> with this group of folks, whom I really cherish dispite my argumentative >> = >>> nature=20 >>> and curmudgeonliness, that the feelings of others, to me, far outweighs >> = >>> my need=20 >>> to express my opinions and stir the pot. I am as passionate about my = >>> beliefs as=20 >>> are others with whom I disagree and I feel like I owe those who come = >>> here for=20 >>> camaradery and some relief from the insanity of these times, some major=20 >>> respect, as one of our wise bretheren often mentions. I am = >>> sorry that=20 >>> he is leaving and IMO, his presence here is much more important to me = >>> and to=20 >>> this group than my opinions and rantings. >>> >>> Deej >>> >>> > >Deej, don't blame yourself, it was somebody else that threw the racism Molotov cocktail on the NG. "Mr. Simplicity" <noway@jose.net> wrote: > > > >"Jamie K" <Meta@Dimensional.com> wrote in message = >news:47e5678b$1@linux... >>=20 >> Mr. Simplicity wrote: >>> I deserve to die. >>=20 >> That's easy enough Deej, when the next "must have or you will die!!" = >toy=20 >> comes along, just don't buy it. ;^) >>=20 >> Cheers, >> -Jamie >> www.JamieKrutz.com > >I'm really sorry that my posts have led to some folks getting outright = >offended and wanting to leave this group. I'm not saying that I disavow = >my thinking on these issues, but I did make a mistake posting them here. = >I use Outlook Express to access this group and for some reason, I can = >get the General group to work on my computer. There comes a time, = >especially with this group of folks, whom I really cherish dispite my = >argumentative nature and curmudgeonliness, that the feelings of others, = >to me, far outweighs my need to express my opinions and stir the pot. I = >am as passionate about my beli