FYI: iLife 08', iWork 08' and new iMacs released.
r /> "Mike Audet" <mike@.....> wrote in message news:4705b550$1@linux... > > Hey all, > > I've got some new goodies! > > I've just released the "PARIS compressor". It's the original PARIS > compress
Re: FYI: iLife 08', iWork 08' and new iMacs released.
or > algo before it was "crunched" to allow 16 compressors to fit on one EDS100 > card. I've added meters (of course) AND > > I fixed the sample rate bug in this and my previous two plugins! > > If you hadn't heard, almost all the PARIS effects assume 48k for their > calculations, > even when they are working at 44.1K. Not these. They operate at the > project > sample rate. Can you hear a difference? You tell me! > > you can download these at www.mikeaudet.com/ensoniq.ca or > once the DNS goes through, simply at ensoniq.ca. > > These plugins are released as "pay what you can" (ie - not free). I'm > not a rich man, and I could use the help. > > As always, let me know what you think. >Cool..Great work Mike.. How's that cool DAQ Comtroller project going? "Mike Audet" <mike@.....> wrote: > >Hey all,<
mark@avidrecording> wrote: >>Heads up boys and girls; ye olde Pacific Plate is rustling
around in the > >>last two weeks in places it doesn't usually. Started southern-most >>opposite > >>edge of US left coast and is now scooching around on the ocean floor in > >>Alaska which is the opposite end that plate. My completely non-scien
sual C++ 4.2 cross platform edition just to compile the code. The cheapest I've seen it for is around $80 plus shipping. If a Mac user wants to send me a copy or the $100 (I live in Canada and shipping is always stupid expensive), I'll get to work on it. But even then, I can't make any promises except to try. All the best, Mike "Aaron Allen" <know-spam@not_here.dude> wrote: >Deeeewwwwwwwwwd..... As soon as these 15-18 hr days cease, I will be all >over this. >Did you by chance fix it so that the Mac mismap bug is gone for the Mac >users? >Question: can I run 'this' compressor also w/o causing problems on the >crunched version that shipped with the Paris rigs? > >AA > > >"Mike Audet" <mike@.....> wrote in message news:4705b550$1@linux... >> >> Hey all, >> >> I've got some new goodies! >> >> I've just released the &quot
;PARIS compressor". It's the original PARIS >> compressor >> algo before it was "crunched" to allow 16 compressors to fit on one EDS100 >> card. I've added meters (of course) AND >> >> I fixed the sample rate bug in this and my previous two plugins! >><br
/> >> If you hadn't heard, almost all the PARIS effects assume 48k for their >> calculations, >> even when they are working at 44.1K. Not these. They operate at the >> project >> sample rate. Can you hear a difference? You tell me! >> >> you can download these at www.mikeaudet.com/ensoniq.ca or >> once the DNS goes through, simply at ensoniq.ca. >> >> These plugins are released as "pay what you can" (ie - not free). I'm >> not a rich man, and I could use the help. >> >> As always, let me know what you think. >> > >Hi Lamont, I think you have me confused with someone else - or I'm losing it. :) What is the DAQ Controller project? "LaMont" <jjdpro@gmail.com> wrote: > >Cool..Great work Mike.. > >How's that cool DAQ Comtroller project going? > >"Mike Audet" <mike@.....> wrote: >> >>Hey all, >> >>I've got some new goodies! >> >>I've just released the "PARIS compressor". It's the original PARIS compressor >>algo before it was "crunched" to allow 16 compressors to fit on one EDS100 >>card. I've added meters (of course) AND >> >>I fixed the sample rate bug in this and my previous two plugins! >> >>If you hadn't heard, almost all the PARIS effects assume 48k for their calculations, >>even when they are working at 44.1K. Not these. They operate at the project >>sample rate. Can you hear a difference? You tell me! >> >>you can download these at www.mikeaudet.com/ensoniq.ca or >>once the DNS goes through, simply at ensoniq.ca. >> >>These plugins are released as "pay what you can" (ie - not f
now that we had sample rate conversion on the fly !! This maybe woul
d fix some digital noise thing with eventiter ! Mike can you add a dry wet mix knob on reverbs ?? There is a way to use them on inserts but without this dry/wet thing it is of no real use !! Thanks for your great efforts and I hope that everyone will reply to this and say at least a thank (some money to him is also better :))you Mike for what you are doing for Paris !!! Regards, Dimitrios "Mike Audet" <mike@.....> wrote:
> >Hey all, > >I've got some new goodies! > >I've just released the "PARIS compressor". It's the original PARIS compressor >algo before it was "crunched" to allow 16 comp
hese plugins are released as "pay what you can" (ie - not free). I'm >not a rich man, and I could use the help. > >As always, let me know what you think. >http://tinyurl.com/m7avrHi Dimitrios, Thanks for you kind words! It's not that we had sample rate conversion on the fly, but the math done to change the samples as they came through was all based on a 48k sample rate. So, all the parameters were around 10% wrong. Sample rate is used for more than just what EQ to tweak - there's a lot of math that goes on regarding how the frequencies are affected, an a lot of that involves having the sample rate right. The FreakQ was always set to 44.1. All the other effects I've seen are set to 48 by default. If eventiter doesn't make the digital noise at 48k, themn I would say that there is a very good chance I can fix it. As for adding a wet/dry mix, I think I will eventually be able to do that. I found a 100 page spec of the PARIS DSP assembler. I'm going to give it a read, but it will be a while before I can really do much with it. I'm just learning. :) Thanks also for offering the hosting. I'm all set at ensoniq.ca for now. All the best, <br
ys send some money to Mike. >I have already and I will send again ... >We need Mike developing and I can see him making nEW PLUGZ for us. !! >Hey Mike. >I can probably give you access to my site (for free of course) and some MB's >to upload your stuff. >If you wanna do this email me... >This 48khz versus 44.1 khz thing just k..s me ! >I did not know that we had sample rate conversion on the fly !! >This maybe would fix some digital noise thing with eventiter ! > >Mike can you add a dry wet mix knob on reverbs ?? >There is a way to use them on inserts but without this dry/wet thing it is >of no real use !! > >Thanks for your great efforts and I hope that everyone will reply to this >and say at least a thank (some money to him is also better :))you Mike for >what you are doing for Paris !!! > >Regards, >Dimitrios > >"Mike Audet" <mike@.....> wrote: >> >>Hey all, >> >>I've got some new goodies! >> >>I've just released the "PARIS compressor". It's the original PARIS compressor >>algo before it was "crunched" to allow 16 compressors to fit on one EDS100 >>card. I've added meters (of course) AND >> >>I fixed the sample rate bug in this and my previous two plugins! >> >>If you hadn't heard, almost all the PARIS effects assume 48k for their calculations, >>even when they are working at 44.1K. Not these. They operate at the project >>sample rate. Can you hear a difference? You tell me! >> >>you can download these at www.mikeaudet.com/ensoniq.ca or >>once the DNS goes through, simply at ensoniq.ca. >> >>These plugins are released as "pay what you can" (ie - not free). I'm >>not a ri
You tell me! >> >>you can download these at www.mikeaudet.com/ensoniq.ca or >>once the DNS goes through, simply at ensoniq.ca. >> >>These plugins are released as "pay what you can" (ie - not free). I'm >>not a rich man, and I could use the help. >> >>As always, let me know what you think. >> >Well, I'm not a true believe in the mix buss voodoo crew to begin with, but if it sounds better I have no problem with that. IMHO the main reason Live sounds weaker is because often the projects done in it use time stretched/beat sliced loops. There's no way to keep pristine sound quality with that stuff. However, my highest end soft synths (i.e. the Spectrasonics synths) sounds as good in Live as they do in any other app. My guess is that the '64 bit mixing engine' has a lot more to do with the marketing department than it does Robert Henke. Still, some of the new features look really cool. TCB "LaMont" <jjdpro@ameritech.net> wrote: > >http://www.ableton.com/live-7-whats-new > >It seems that they have addressed the one thing that users and non users >have complained about and that's the audio engine. To my ears, it did sound >a bit vanilla. Now, they've twaeked it.You probably mean Doug Wellington and his DAW controller project. AA "LaMont" <jjdpro@gmail.com> wrote in message news:4705cff6$1@linux... > > Cool..Great work Mike.. > > How's that cool DAQ Comtroller project going? > > "Mike Audet" <mike@.....> wrote: >> >>Hey all, >> >>I've got some new goodies! >> >>I've just released the "PARIS compressor". It's the original PARIS >>compressor >>algo before it was "crunched" to allow 16 compressors to fit on one EDS100 >>card. I've added meters (of course) AND >> >>I fixed the sample rate bug in this and my previous two plugins! >> >>If you hadn't heard, almost all the PARIS effects assume 48k for their >>calculations, >>even when they are working at 44.1K. Not these. They operate at the >&g
set at ensoniq.ca for now. >> >>All the best, >> >>Mike >> >> >> >> >>"Dimitrios" <musurgio@otenet.gr> wrote: >>> >>>Hey Mike !! >>>Thats brilliant work !! >>>I am now trying the new comp and will post what I think of it !! >>>Hey guys send some money to Mike. >>>I have already and I will send again ... >>>We need Mike developing and I can see him making nEW PLUGZ for us. !! >>>Hey Mike. >>>I can probably give you access to my site (for free of course) and some >>MB's >>>to upload your stuff. >>>If you wanna do this email me... >>>This 48khz versus 44.1 khz thing just k..s me ! >>>I did not know that we had sample rate conversion on the fly !! >>>This maybe would fix some digital noise thing with eventiter ! >>> >>>Mike can you add a dry wet mix knob on reverbs ?? >>>There is a way to use them on inserts but without this dry/wet thing it >>is >>>of no real use !! >>> >>>Thanks for your great efforts and I hope that everyone will reply to this >>>and say at least a thank (some money to him is also better :))you Mike >for >>>what you are doing for Paris !!! >>> >>>Regards, >>>Dimitrios >>> >>>"Mike Audet" <mike@.....> wrote: >>>> >>>>Hey all, >>>> >>>>I've got some new goodies! >>>> >>>>I've just released the "PARIS compressor". It's the original PARIS compressor >>>>algo before it was "crunched" to allow 16 compressors to fit on one EDS100 >>>>card. I've added meters (of course) AND >>>> >>>>I fixed the sample rate bug in this and my previous two plugins! >>>> >>>>If you hadn't heard, almost all the PARIS effects assume 48k for their >>calculations, >>>>even when they are working at 44.1K. Not these. They operate at the >project >>>>sample rate. Can you hear a difference? You tell me! >>>> >>>>you can download these at www.mikeaudet.com/ensoniq.ca or >>>>once the DNS goes through, simply at ensoniq.ca. >>>> >>>>These plugins are released as "pay what you can" (ie - not free). I'm >>>>not a rich man, and I could use the help. >>>> >>>>As always, let me know what you think. >>>> >>> >> >Dear Mike, If you are gonna think about doing some new plugz here are some ideas to catch on! 1) I buss adder !!! Yes that is a great addittion !
This plug could use the out and in wires but the in wire should be able to accept more than one out wire !! Now you can only send one track to another, with another plugin like this we could send all out wires #1# to a in wire #1# and have all drumtracks send to another channle and then add an overall compressor ! Then the latency adder should be needed as to delay the audiotracks sending to compensate for phase ! Regards, Dimitrios "Mike Audet" <mike@....> wrote: > >Hi Dimitrios, > >Thanks for you kind words! > >It's not that we had sample rate conversion on the fly, but the math done >to change the samples as they came through was all based on a 48k sample >rate. So, all the parameters were around 10% wrong. Sample rate is used >for more than just what EQ to tweak - there's a lot of math that goes on >regarding how the frequencies are affected, an a lot of that involves having >the sample rate right. > >The FreakQ was always set to 44.1. All the other effects I've seen are set >to 48 by default. If eventiter doesn't make the digital noise at 48k, themn >I would say that there is a very good chance I can fix it. > >As for adding a wet/dry mix, I think I will eventually be able to do that. > I found a 100 page spec of the PARIS DSP assembler. I'm going to give it >a read, but it will be a while before I can really do much with it. I'm >just learning. :) > >Thanks also for offering the hosting. I'm all set at ensoniq.ca for now. > >All the best, > >Mike > > > > >"Dimitrios" <musurgio@otenet.gr> wrote: >> >>Hey Mike !! >>Thats brilliant work !! >>I am now trying the new comp and will post what I think of it !! >>Hey guys send some money to Mike. >>I have already and I will send again ... >>We need Mike developing and I can see him making nEW PLUGZ for us. !! >>Hey Mike. >>I can probably give you access to my site (for free of course) and some >MB's >>to upload your stuff. >>If you wanna do this email me... >>This 48khz versus 44.1 khz thing just k..s me ! >>I did not know that we had sample rate conversion on the fly !! >>This maybe would fix some digital noise thing with eventiter ! >> >>Mike can you add a dry wet mix knob on reverbs ?? >>There is a way to use them on inserts but without this dry/wet thing it >is >>of no real use !! >> >>Thanks for your great efforts and I hope that everyone will reply to this >>and say at least a thank (some money to him is also better :))you Mike for >>what you are doing for Paris !!! >> >>Regards, >>Dimitrios >> >>"Mike Audet" <mike@.....> wrote: >>> >>>Hey all, >>> >>>I've got some new goodies! >>> >>>I've just released the "PARIS compressor". It's the original PARIS compressor >>>algo before it was "crunched" to allow 16 compressors to fit on one EDS100 >>>card. I've added meters (of course) AND >>> >>>I fixed the sample rate bug in this and my previous two plugins! >>> >>>If you hadn't heard, almost all the PARIS effects assume 48k for their >calculations, >>>even when they are working at 44.1K. Not these. They operate at the
project >>>sample rate. Can you hear a difference? You tell me! >>> >>>you can download these at www.mikeaudet.com/ensoniq.ca or >>>once the DNS goes through, simply at ensoniq.ca. >>> >>>These plugins are released as "pay what you can" (ie - not free). I'm >>>not a rich man, and I could use the help. >>> >>>As always, let me know what you think. >>> >> >Hi Mike, the latency from DX does not work realtime. t has to have an audio track there beeing played. if you use wires out and in then it had to be as eds effect. Anyway these are just thoughts. I know of the 16 plugz limit. But as I see in my mixes putting around 610 eds plugz maxes eds cpu. So there is plent of 6-10 slots for this latency adder. You can even use this when you use the paris as a mixer only sending audio from another computer to it via adat and then adding eds effects. then DX latency compensation cannot do anything !! Thanks for considering. regards, Dimitrios "Mike Audet" <mike@....> wrote: > >Hi Dimitrios, > >I'll look into the mix option - I think that is a good idea, but it won't >happen soon because it involves DSP coding in Ensoniq assembler - out of >my league at present. > >As for the latency plug, why not just use sampleslide? Each EDS card can >only have 16 effects at once. Using one of them for something that can be >done so well by a dx plugin sounds like a waste to me. Perhaps a stereo >one would make sense... > >I'm glad you like the plug. I'm reading about WDM drivers right now. I'd >love to fix the ADAT card bug in Windows XP. As always, no promises, though. >:) > >All the best, > >Mike >"Dimitrios" <musurgio@otenet.gr> wrote: >> >>Hi Mike, >>Yes this compressor on fast times sounds cleaner than the stock one !! >>Nice !! >>Can you please add a dry mix on the compressors ?? >>That should have the 2 samples latency as to be in phase . >>You know all ensoniq plugins introduce 2 samples latency ! >>That would make a very very important addition ! >>Thus you could add (in phase) some uncompressed signal along a squashed >one >>!! >>I would love that !! >> >>Also it would be handy a simple latency adder ! >>That is if you wanna put a couple of compressors on kick and snare and keep >>the drumtracks in phase you could put the latency adder for the 2 samples >>each introduces and not charge the Eds cpu ! >> >>Keep up the great work ! >>Regards, >>Dimitrios >> >> >> >>"Mike Audet" <mike@....> wrote: >>> >>>Hi Dimitrios, >>> >>>Thanks for you kind words! >>> >>>It's not that we had sample rate conversion on the fly, but the math done >>>to change the samples as they came through was all based on a 48k sample >>>rate. So, all the parameters were around 10% wrong. Sample rate is used >>>for more than just what EQ to tweak - there's a lot of math that goes on >>>regarding how the frequencies are affected, an a lot of that involves having >>>the sample rate right. >>> >>>The FreakQ was always set to 44.1. All the other effects I've seen are >>set >>>to 48 by default. If eventiter doesn't make the digital noise at 48k, >themn >>>I would say that there is a very good chance I can fix it. >>> >>>As for adding a wet/dry mix, I think I will eventually be able to do that. >>> I found a 100 page spec of the PARIS DSP assembler. I'm going to give >>it >>>a read, but it will be a while before I can really do much with it. I'm >>>just learning. :) >>> >>>Thanks also for offering the hosting. I'm all set at ensoniq.ca for now. >>> >>>All the best, >>> >>>Mike >>> >>><b
r /> >>> >>> >>>"Dimitrios" <musurgio@otenet.gr> wrote: >>>> >>>>Hey Mike !! >>>>Thats brilliant work !! >>>>I am now trying the new comp and will post what I think of it !! >>>>Hey guys send some money to Mike. >>>>I have already and I will send again ... >>>>We need Mike developing and I can see him making nEW PLUGZ for us. !! >>>>Hey Mike. >>>>I can probably give you access to my site (for free of course) and some >>>MB's >>>>to upload your stuff. >>>>If you wanna do this email me... >>>>This 48khz versus 44.1 khz thing just k..s me ! >>>>I did not know that we had sample rate conversion on the fly !! >>>>This maybe would fix some digital noise thing with eventiter ! >>>> >>>>Mike can you add a dry wet mix knob on reverbs ?? >>>>There is a way to use them on inserts but without this dry/wet thing it >>>is >>>>of no real use !! >>>> >>>>Thanks for your great efforts and I hope that everyone will reply to this >>>>and say at least a thank (some money to him is also better :))you Mike >>for >>>>what you are doing for Paris !!! >>>> >>>>Regards, >>>>Dimitrios >>>> >>>>"Mike Audet" <mike@.....> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>Hey all, >>>>> >>>>>I've got some new goodies! >>>>> >>>>>I've just released the "PARIS compressor". It's the original PARIS compressor >>>>>algo before it was "crunched" to allow 16 compressors to fit on one EDS100 >>>>>card. I've added meters (of course) AND >>>>> >>>>>I fixed the sample rate bug in this and my previous two plugins! >>>>> >>>>>If you hadn't heard, almost all the PARIS effects assume 48k for their >>>calculations, >>>>>even when they are working at 44.1K. Not these. They operate at the >>project >>>>>sample rate. Can you hear a difference? You tell me! >>>>> >>>>>you can download these at www.mikeaudet.com/ensoniq.ca or >>>>>once the DNS goes through, simply at ensoniq.ca. >>>>> >>>>>These plugins are released as "pay what you can" (ie - not free). >I'm >>>>>not a rich man, and I could use the help. >>>>> >>>>>As always, let me know what you think. >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >I sure wouldn't buy in at the top. What goes up must come down, eventually. Well, at least you admit you can't stand Mac OSX. The Question is why! You don't need to answer that. "TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote: > >http://finance.google.com/finance?q=aapl > >Apple had one 2:1 split in early 2005, so if you bought the stock before >then (say in the high 20's) the current share price should be doubled, so >you've had a 10x return in less than three years. It's also trading at 44x >earnings right now, while HP, Dell, and MSFT are trading at less than half >of that, so you have to be a real believer in future growth to be a buyer >today. However, I wish I had every penny of my money in AAPL since Jan 1 >2005, even if I can't stand their operating systems. > >TCB > >"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote: >> >>A lot more people use DP than you think. The Mac side needs to maintain >choice, >>other wise people will say that there is no Audio software for the Mac. > >>Stupid people would listen and abandon the platform. There is not one size >>that fits all, people like choice. >> >>I thought they should have bought Steinberg, MOTU over Emagic, but hey, >it's >>all history now. By the way have you seen Apple stock prices lately? They >>must have made some right choices. I wish I would have listen to myself >>and bought when they dipped below $14.00 a share. The stock has split at >>least once or twice since then. Oh well. >> >>"LaMont" <jjdpro@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>Hey Jamie, on the software front, Motu can't compete with Apple's giveaway >>>pricing of Logic Studio. Let's be hones
t, DP's main user base is the Hollywood >>>composer crowd. Not enough to keep up with Apple's onslaught. >>> >>>Competition is good for any industry, but it seems that like most industries, >>>"consolidation" is the name of the game. >>> >>> >>> >>>Jamie K <Meta@Dimensional.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>OTOH, in the interested of having some choices, it'd be better to have >> >>>>DP and Logic continue to compete. >>>> >>>>Cheers, >>>> -Jamie >>>> www.JamieKrutz.com >>>> >>>> >>>>Gantt Kushner wrote: >>>>> Damn! And put the MOTU software engineers together w/ the Apple engineers >>>>> to combine DP and Logic? >>>>> >>>>> Gantt >>>>> >>>>> "LaMont" <jjdpro@ameritech.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Just my thought,I think it would be a great move if Apple aquired >>>>>> Motu. >>>>> >>>>> >>> >> >I've been very open about why I don't like OS X, and why I really don't like Vista, so I don't have to 'admit' anything. "James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote: > >I sure wouldn't buy in at the top. What goes up must come down, eventually. > > >Well, at least you admit you can't stand Mac OSX. The Question is why! >You don't need to answer that. > >"TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote: >> >>http://finance.google.com/finance?q=aapl >> >>Apple had one 2:1 split in early 2005, so if you bought the stock before >>then (say in the high 20's) the current share price should be doubled, so >>you've had a 10x return in less than three years. It's also trading at 44x >>earnings right now, while HP, Dell, and MSFT are trading at less than half >>of that, so you have to be a real believer in future growth to be a buyer >>today. However, I wish I had every penny of my money in AAPL since Jan 1 >>2005, even if I can't stand their operating systems. >> >>TCB >> >>"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>A lot more people use DP than you think. The Mac side needs to maintain >>choice, >>>other wise people will say that there is no Audio software for the Mac. >> >>>Stupid people would listen and abandon the platform. There is not one >size >>>that fits all, people like choice. >>> >>>I thought they should have bought Steinberg, MOTU over Emagic, but hey, >>it's >>>all history now. By the way have you seen Apple stock prices lately? >They >>>must have made some right choices. I wish I would have listen to myself >>>and bought when they dipped below $14.00 a share. The stock has split >at >>>least once or twice since then. Oh well. >>> >>>"LaMont" <jjdpro@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>Hey Jamie, on the software front, Motu can't compete with Apple's giveaway >>>>pricing of Logic Studio. Let's be honest, DP's main user base is the Hollywood >>>>composer crowd. Not enough to keep up with Apple's onslaught. >>>> >>>>Competition is good for any industry, but it seems that like most industries, >>>>"consolidation" is the name of the game. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>Jamie K <Meta@Dimensional.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>OTOH, in the interested of having some choices, it'd be better to have >>> >>>>>DP and Logic continue to compete. >>>>> >>>>>Cheers, >>>>> -Jamie >>>>> www.JamieKrutz.com >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>Gantt Kushner wrote: >>>>>> Damn! And put the MOTU software engineers together w/ the Apple engineers >>>>>> to combine DP and Logic? >>>>>> >>>>>> Gantt >>>>>> >>>>>> "LaMont" <jjdpro@ameritech.net> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Just my thought,I think it would be a great move if Apple aquired >>>>>>> Motu. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>> >> >http://apnews.excite.com/article/20071005/D8S30UJO4.htmlJust wanted to say thanks for all your hard work. I don't post often, but I could not resist this opportunity to say a few kind words for those who c
ontinue to move paris forward. I have made a donation as well. ThanksNow that Steinberg has dropped support for the Midex, I'm wondering who makes a USB midi interface with tight timing.I thought this was so cool that I just sent you some money. :o) "Mike Audet" <mike@.....> wrote in message news:4705b550$1@linux... > > Hey all, > > I've got some new goodies! > > I've just released the "PARIS compressor". It's the original PARIS > compressor > algo before it was "crunched" to allow 16 compressors to fit on one EDS100 > card. I've added meters (of course) AND > > I fixed the sample rate bug in this and my previous two plugins! > > If you hadn't heard, almost all the PARIS effects assume 48k for their > calculations, > even when they are working at 44.1K. Not these. They operate at the > project > sample rate. Can you hear a difference? You tell me! > > you can download these at www.mikeaudet.com/ensoniq.ca or > once the DNS goes through, simply at ensoniq.ca. > > These plugins are released as "pay what you can" (ie - not free). I'm > not a rich man, and I could use the help. > > As always, let me know what you think. >"DJ" <animix _ at _ animas _ dot _ net> wrote: >Now that Steinberg has dropped support for the Midex, I'm wondering who >makes a USB midi interface with tight timing. > > The did what???? In what applications???? TCBAwesome--will download and donate later this afternoon. Many thanks! "DJ" <animix _ at _ animas _ dot _ net> wrote: >I thought this was so cool that I just sent you some money. >:o) > >"Mike Audet" <mike@.....> wrote in message news:4705b550$1@linux... >> >> Hey all, >> >> I've got some new goodies! >> >> I've just released the "PARIS compressor". It's the original PARIS >> compressor >> algo before it was "crunched" to allow 16 compressors to fit on one EDS100 >> card. I've added meters (of course) AND >> >> I fixed the sample rate bug in this and my previous two plugins! >> >> If you hadn't heard, almost all the PARIS effects assume 48k for their >> calculations, >> even when they are working at 44.1K. Not these. They operate at the >> project >> sample rate. Can you hear a difference? You tell me! >> >> you can download these at www.mikeaudet.com/ensoniq.ca or >> once the DNS goes through, simply at ensoniq.ca. >> >> These plugins are released as "pay what you can" (ie - not free). I'm >> not a rich man, and I could use the help. >> >> As always, let me know what you think. >> > >Hey DJ, You once showed again to all of us what a hell of a nice person you are !! My regards to you, DimitriosI've still got my 3.0 software that isn't tied to any hardware card. You never know what the future will hold.....plus, maybe Mike will have the time in the future to create a VST version of these plugins. At any rate, I get more support here for my ongoing endeavors than I do anywhere else so even if I'm not using Paris right now, I want to contribute something. You guys rock....well...except for Neil....... ;oD "Dimitrios" <musurgio@otenet.gr> wrote in message news:4706831d$1@linux... > > Hey DJ, > You once showed again to all of us what a hell of a nice person you are !! > My regards to you, > DimitriosI don't know Thad, many hard core Live users I know, who uses Live to Track sessions with it (No elastic audio)..They say it's sounds too vanilla. so, they import the session to Pro Tools to mix which has a very nice mid-top end sound (with the same m-audio) audio interface. To my ears, when I have to work in Sonar, it's the same bland sound..We take the tracks, import to Nuendo to mix.. "TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote: > >Well, I'm not a true believe in the mix buss voodoo crew to begin with, but >if it sounds better I have no problem with that. IMHO the main reason Live >sounds weaker is because often the projects done in it use time stretched/beat >sliced loops. There's no way to keep pristine sound quality with that stuff. >However, my highest end soft synths (i.e. the Spectrasonics synths) sounds >as good in Live as they do in any other app. > >My guess is that the '64 bit mixing engine' has a lot more to do with the >marketing department than it does Robert Henke. > >Still, some of the new features look really cool. > >TCB > >"LaMont" <jjdpro@ameritech.net> wrote: >> >>http://www.ableton.com/live-7-whats-new >> >>It seems that they have addressed the one thing that users and non users >>have complained about and that's the audio engine. To my ears, it did sound >>a bit vanilla. Now, they've twaeked it. >I don't use Live, so I haven't heard about the 64-bit upgrade or k
now what Live used before. Hmm, I'm thinking summing isn't so much baloney - it's more like swiss cheese.... on slices of corned beef, with some sauerkraut, and russian dressing... on a nice rye....grilled.... mmm...lunchtime! ;-)) Regards, Dedric "LaMont" <jjdpro@gmail.com> wrote in message news:47055f61$1@linux... > > Hey, Dedric, what's this 64bit summing upgrade from Ableton all about? I > thought > , all that summing business was baloney.This is nice. I'm Crying!!!!!!!!!!! WAAA WAAAA WAAAA http://www.digidesign.com/index.cfm?langid=100&navid=152 &itemid=27515&action=news_detailsLol!! "Dedric Terry" <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote: >I don't use Live, so I haven't heard about the 64-bit upgrade or know what >Live used before. > >Hmm, I'm thinking summing isn't so much baloney - it's more like swiss >cheese.... on slices of corned beef, with some sauerkraut, and russian >dressing... on a nice rye....grilled.... mmm...lunchtime! ;-)) > >Regards, >Dedric > >"LaMont" <jjdpro@gmail.com> wrote in message news:47055f61$1@linux... >> >> Hey, Dedric, what's this 64bit summing upgrade from Ableton all about? I >> thought >> , all that summing business was baloney. >If this work, this could be the bets thing for all stypes of studios big and small. http://aes.harmony-central.com/123AES/Content/IKMultimedia/P R/ARC.htmlAnd other news.. And, another Torrent site.. "James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote: > >http://apnews.excite.com/article/20071005/D8S30UJO4.htmlThis is way over due. "LaMont" <jjdpro@gmail.com> wrote: > >If this work, this could be the bets thing for all stypes of studios big and >small. > > http://aes.harmony-central.com/123AES/Content/IKMultimedia/P R/ARC.htmlAnd way over-priced. I'll wait for the $300 version to come out. Neil "James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote: > >This is way over due. > >"LaMont" <jjdpro@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>If this work, this could be the bets thing for all stypes of studios big >and >>small. >> >> http://aes.harmony-central.com/123AES/Content/IKMultimedia/P R/ARC.html >"DJ" <animix _ at _ animas _ dot _ net> wrote: > >You guys rock....well...except for Neil....... HEY! :)Mike, Thanks for your ongoing efforts to provide new Paris stuff. I sent you some mojo via paypal. "Mike Audet" <mike@.....> wrote in message news:4705b550$1@linux... > > Hey all, > > I've got some new goodies! > > I've just released the "PARIS compressor". It's the original PARIS > compressor > algo before it was "crunched" to allow 16 compressors to fit on one EDS100 > card. I've added meters (of course) AND > > I fixed the sample rate bug in this and my previous two plugins! > > If you hadn't heard, almost all the PARIS effects assume 48k for their > calculations, > even when they are working at 44.1K. Not these. They operate at the > project > sample rate. Can you hear a difference? You tell me! > > you can download these at www.mikeaudet.com/ensoniq.ca or > once the DNS goes through, simply at ensoniq.ca. > > These plugins are released as "pay what you can" (ie - not free). I'm > not a rich man, and I could use the help. > > As always, let me know what you think. >"2 samples latency as to be in phase " That's so funny and strange. 2 samples? Chuck "Dimitrios" <musurgio@otenet.gr> wrote: > >Hi Mike, >the latency from DX does not work realtime. >t has to have an audio track there beeing played. >if you use wires out and in then it had to be as eds effect. >Anyway these are just thoughts. >I know of the 16 plugz limit. >But as I see in my mixes putting around 610 eds plugz maxes eds cpu. >So there is plent of 6-10 slots for this latency adder. >You can even use this when you use the paris as a mixer only sending audio >from another computer to it via adat and then adding eds effects. >then DX latency compensation cannot do anything !! >Thanks for considering. >regards, >Dimitrios > >"Mike Audet" <mike@....> wrote: >> >>Hi Dimitrios, >> >>I'll look into the mix option - I think that is a good idea, but it won't >>happen soon because it involves DSP coding in Ensoniq assembler - out of >>my league at present. >> >>As for the latency plug, why not just use sampleslide? Each EDS card can >>only have 16 effects at once. Using one of them for something that can >be >>done so well by a dx plugin sounds like a waste to me. Perhaps a stereo >>one would make sense... >> >>I'm glad you like the plug. I'm reading about WDM drivers right now. I'd >>love to fix the ADAT card bug in Windows XP. As always, no promises, though. >>:) >> >>All the best, >> >>Mike >>"Dimitrios" <musurgio@otenet.gr> wrote: >>> >>>Hi Mike, >>>Yes this compressor on fast times sounds cleaner than the stock one !! >>>Nice !! >>>Can you please add a dry mix on the compressors ?? >>>That should have the 2 samples latency as to be in phase . >>>You know all ensoniq plugins introduce 2 samples latency ! >>>That would make a very very important addition ! >>>Thus you could add (in phase) some uncompressed signal along a squashed >>one >>>!! >>>I would love that !! >>
ICWHxqi4EdkBNcD [binary]
have four Mac users other than me whowould be willing to kick in $20 >>each? >> >>Thanks Mike! >> >>Gantt >> >>"Mike Audet" <mike@...> wrote: >>> >>>I would really like to tackle the Mac stuff, but I don't have a Mac running >>>PARIS and I'm pretty sure that I need a copy of Visual C++ 4.2 cross platform >>>edition just to compile the code. The cheapest I've seen it for is around >>>$80 plus shipping. If a Mac user wants to send me a copy or the $100 (I >>>live in Canada and shipping is always stupid expensive), I'll get to work >>>on it. >>>But even then, I can'
t make any promises except to try. >>> >>>All the best, >>> >>>Mike >>> >>>"Aaron Allen" <know-spam@not_here.dude> wrote: >>>>Deeeewwwwwwwwwd..... As soon as these 15-18 hr days cease, I will be all >>> >>>>over this. >>>>Did you by chance fix it so that the Mac mismap bug is gone for the Mac >>> >>>>users? >>>>Question: can I run 'this' compressor also w/o causing problems on the >> >>>>crunched version that shipped with the Paris rigs? >>>> >>>>AA >>>> >>>> >>>>"Mike Audet" <mike@.....> wrote in message news:4705b550$1@linux... >>>>> >>>>> Hey all, >>>>> >>>>> I've got some new goodies! >>>>> >>>>> I've just released the "PARIS compressor". It's the original PARIS > >>>>> compressor >>>>> algo before it was "crunched" to allow 16 compressors to fit on one >EDS100 >>>>> card. I've added meters (of course) AND >>>>> >>>>> I fixed the sample rate bug in this and my previous two plugins! >>>>> >>>>> If you hadn't heard, almost all the PARIS effects assume 48k for their >>> >>>>> calculations, >>>>> even when they are working at 44.1K. Not these. They operate at the >>> >>>>> project >>>>> sample rate. Can you hear a difference? You tell me! >>>>> >>>>> you can download these at www.mikeaudet.com/ensoniq.ca or >>>>> once the DNS goes through, simply at ensoniq.ca. >>>>> >>>>> These plugins are released as "pay what you can" (ie - not free). > >>I'm >>>>> not a rich man, and I could use the help. >>>>> >>>>> As always, let me know what you think. >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >http://www.vexman.com/botflyremoval.wmv Bonnie alerted me to this delightful little movie. -steve the posting fool"LaMont" <jjdpro@gmail.com> wrote: > >Who's taking about LE 003?? I'm talking the other listed system C24 with HD2 >Acel for 18k.. I didn't know exactly what you wre talking about - that's why I asked. $18k - i dunno, that's still a pretty huge investment. Still doesn't really change the entry-level price point for HD by very much, just gives you more bang for your buck. NeilLaMont, I just installed the Addictive Drums demo. I must say that it sounds very good and is really easy to use. I've got a lot invested in BFD right now and I'm going to waitsee what's new with that. the BFD2 upgrade for current users is $200.00 and it includes an additional 635448765.225 GB of samples Here's a bit of info on it. http://www.fxpansion.com/fxvideoplayer/videoplayer.php?id=88 7 I'll probably hold out to see how this looks before I spend any more money on drum samplers. Deej "LaMont" <jjdpro@gmail.com> wrote in message news:4707c6b3$1@linux... > > It is nice. But, he XLN way in Addictive drums is lot less mouse clicks. > > I have to disagree with you my friend on EZ drums libs. I love them. The > BFD drums are too raw. Requires too much work when working on a mix. > You probably noticed all of these third party BFDdrum libraries that are > very much processed and ready to go. > > "DJ" <animix _ at _ animas _ dot _ net> wrote: >>For you guys out there using BFD who absolutely hate the midi >>loop/audition > >>interface (I'm one of those), there is a solution. >> >>First go register at Toontrack, then DL the free EzPlayer. >> >>Next, install the EzPlayer on your computer (it will only show up as a >>VSTi > >>in a host sequencer) >> >>Next, in your sequencer create a midi track. >> >>Next instantiate EZPlayer as a VSTi and up at the top, go to the function > >>where you navigate to your midi loops library and set directory path to > your >>loops, wherever they may be. >> >>Next instantiate BFD as a VSTi >> >>In your midi track choose EzPlayer as the midi input and BFD as the midi > >>output. >> >>Now you can go to EzPlayer and click on the loop you want to audition, BFD > >>will play it and then from EzPlayer you can drag and drop it into your >>sequencer midi track. It's incredibly quick and easy to use this way. >> >>It looks like BFD2 is going to following a similar path as Toontracks >>EzDrummer from the looks of the interface. I can't wait. I didn't much >>like > >>the samples in EzDrummer.too preprocessed for my tastes. >> >>Anyway, for those who work with BFD and midi loops, this is definitely the > >>ticket, IMO. >> >>Deej >> >> >> >> >> >I've noticed - I get those e-mails from them from time to time... which is why I said i'd wait for the $300 "version". :) "LaMont" <jjdpro@gmail.com> wrote: > >IK always set thheir prices too high. >Then, bundle it up in a fire sale. > >"Neil" <OIOI@OIU.com> wrote: >> >>And way over-priced. >> >>I'll wait for the $300 version to come out. >> >>Neil >> >>"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>This is way over due. >>> >>>"LaMont" <jjdpro@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>If this work, this could be the bets thing for all stypes of studios big >>>and >>>>small. >>>> >>>> http://aes.harmony-central.com/123AES/Content/IKMultimedia/P R/ARC.html >>> >> >"steve the artguy" <steve@headintheclouds.com> wrote in message news:4707d8f0$1@linux... > > http://www.vexman.com/botflyremoval.wmv > > Bonnie alerted me to this delightful little movie. > &
gt; -steve the posting fool Awww...........it was soooo cute!!! I don't see why they couldn't have strapped a steak to her head and let it migrate to that, then allow it to fulfill it's destiny I'm gonna call PETA about this.."steve the artguy" <steve@headintheclouds.com> wrote in message news:4707d34c$1@linux... > > guys and gals- > > ok, it's that time of the month again. No, Not That Time! This time! Time > to see Venus in the daytime Time! > > Since our last session, Venus has crossed in front of the sun and is now > leading it across the sky. Today, the moon is slowly closing in on Venus. > I took this picture minutes ago with my ancient Sony camera. Over the next > few hours, the moon will move closer towards the sun, passing Venus in > about > 11 hours (2001-10-07 5UT) after it sets later in the evening. But that's > only here on the west coast of california. If you're in Asia, you may see > the moon pass a couple of degrees north of Venus as it goes on it's merry > way around the Earth. Tomorrow it will be between (and a bit north of) > Venus > and the sun. > > steve the ever-helpful > will it orbit the tree?Great reply. Thanks, so what do you set the bands in Cubase/Nuendo to? What do you set the green/yellow/red values to? Thanks again, JohnMy suggestion would be to use a separate K-system metering since your output buss in Cubase will be used for bounces. But, if you want Cubase's metering to correspond to K-14 just to try it, set green max (yellow min) to -14dBFS, and yellow max to red min at -10dBFS. Of course these are just giving you peak levels and for it to be accurate, it must be correlated to 83db SPL in your monitors, C weighted using pink noise (and pink noise full bandwidth is different from band limited and there are discrepancies in what is considered the most accurate - e.g. Blue Sky's spec vs. Dolby, etc). More later... gotta run take the kids to soccer...:-) Dedric On 10/6/07 1:23 PM, in article 4707e0cc$1@linux, "John" <no@no.com> wrote: > > Great reply. Thanks, so what do you set the bands in Cubase/Nuendo to? What > do you set the green/yellow/red values to? > > Thanks again, > JohnDoug, for me, the difference I'm seeing between you and Don, you're living too far from the big cities and Hollywood;-) Erlilo On Sat, 6 Oct 2007 10:55:29 -0600, "DJ" <animix _ at _ animas _ dot _ net> wrote: > >"DC" <dc@spammersinwestwood.org> wrote in message news:4707b315$1@linux... >> >> "DJ" <animix _ at _ animas _ dot _ net> wrote: >> >> >>>I guess I'm totally out of touch with this stuff. I do sometimes >>>exhibit a penchant for neatness but you'll not be finding any foriegn >>>objects in any of my orfices. >>> >>>;o) >> >> >> That's not really part of the gig... >> >> Carrying a man-bag around, having a 75.00 hair cut, being >> really neat and well-groomed, hang around with gay guys, >> dress to the nines, etc etc but sleeping with women only... >> >> Metrosexual... >> >> BTW, I fit about half of those! >> >> shhh, don't tell my wife... >> >> DC > >Hmmm..letsee.......no man bag, though my wife has encouraged this because >when we go places I'm always needing her to put this or that into her purse >because it's too cumbersome to put in my pocket. I mean, isn't this why men >get married???, so they will have someone to carry their pursees for >them???...sheesh!!!! > >$75.00 hair cut???........I buzz myself with horse clippers about once a >month (not kidding) > >Neat and well groomed???.....humm, I'm usually toting around some horse >manure and dog slobber somewhere on my person and I wear gimme caps >incessantly because the solar radiation up here will fry the skin off a >skinhead in 30 minutes. I'm constantly climbing over barbed wire fences so I >buy my clothes at WalMart. I don't really like Walmart.............in fact I >hate Walmart, but I need cheap, disposable clothes. > >Sleeping with women........well........yeah, I do ascribe to this >wholeheartedly but I woke up this morning sandwiched between two 160lb dogs >who were using me for a heating pad. It's getting cold here at night these >days. > >;o) > > > >Well, if you consider the difference btw an entry level HD1 vs HD2 Acel, thats pretty competitive. The HD2 acel is becoming the PT system of choice for a lot project pro studios. Bypasing the 96 io unit for a Apogee ADx16 or even Lynx 16, you had a really nice rig with that C24 controller. I miss not having a dedicated controller. I guse Paris spoiled me. I can work wih a mouse very well,but as look back, I used the C16 alot.. "Neil" <IOUOIU@OIU.com> wrote: > >"LaMont" <jjdpro@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>Who's taking about LE 003?? I'm talking the other listed system C24 with >HD2 >>Acel for 18k.. > >I didn't know exactly what you wre talking about - that's why I >asked. > >$18k - i dunno, that's still a pretty huge investment. Still >doesn't really change the entry-level price point for HD by >very much, just gives you more bang for your buck. > >NeilDude:) 2 years ago I purchased BFD XL along with DHFH Vintage Custom, along with Battery 2..In the end, I wound up using DKFH VC along with Battery2 and Stylus RMX and Drummagog on most projects. BFD, while cool,was too raw. I need results :)Instant results...Plus, I don;t have allthose cool outboard toys like you have.. "DJ" <animix _ at _ animas _ dot _ net> wrote: >LaMont, > >I just installed the Addictive Drums demo. I must say that it sounds very >good and is really easy to use. I've got a lot invested in BFD right now and >I'm going to waitsee what's new with that. the BFD2 upgrade for current >users is $200.00 and it includes an additional 635448765.225 GB of samples > >Here's a bit of info on it. > http://www.fxpansion.com/fxvideoplayer/videoplayer.php?id=88 7 > >I'll probably hold out to see how this looks before I spend any more money >on drum samplers. > >Deej > > >"LaMont" <jjdpro@gmail.com> wrote in message news:4707c6b3$1@linux... >> >> It is nice. But, he XLN way in Addictive drums is lot less mouse clicks. >> >> I have to disagree with you my friend on EZ drums libs. I love them. The >> BFD drums are too raw. Requires too much work when working on a mix. >> You probably noticed all of these third party BFDdrum libraries that are >> very much processed and ready to go. >> >> "DJ" <animix _ at _ animas _ dot _ net> wrote: >>>For you guys out there using BFD who absolutely hate the midi >>>loop/audition >> >>>interface (I'm one of those), there is a solution. >>> >>>First go register at Toontrack, then DL the free EzPlayer. >>> >>>Next, install the EzPlayer on your computer (it will only show up as a >>>VSTi >> >>>in a host sequencer) >>> >>>Next, in your sequencer create a midi track. >>> >>>Next instantiate EZPlayer as a VSTi and up at the top, go to the function >> >>>where you navigate to your midi loops library and set directory path to >> your >>>loops, wherever they may be. >>> >>>Next instantiate BFD as a VSTi >>> >>>In your midi track choose EzPlayer as the midi input and BFD as the midi >> >>>output. >>> >>>Now you can go to EzPlayer and click on the loop you want to audition, BFD >> >>>will play it and then from EzPlayer you can drag and drop it into your >>>sequencer midi track. It's incredibly quick and easy to use this way. >>> >>>It looks like BFD2 is going to following a similar path as Toontracks >>>EzDrummer from the looks of the interface. I can't wait. I didn't much >>>like >> >>>the samples in EzDrummer.too preprocessed for my tastes. >>> >>>Anyway, f
quot; [binary] h
YQhTBzMlbZg8 [binary]
PT M Powered on a Quad PC ..was FYI: iLife 08', iWork 08' and new iMacs released.
URlJeLPgbQUMtKAiZwaUGlbBjHsGfMql [binary]
Re: PT M Powered on a Quad PC ..was FYI: iLife 08', iWork 08' and new iMacs released.
vl/E74Iu6LhSvrWiqvlP+FHZ [binary]
[binary] CgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKCgoK CgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKCgoK [binary]
paXlCMLSKtFFFWvl1V3rjyoR [binary] [binary]
u79BiacNVr [binary]
iuqqthCkh/8X//4R3Nn59jMDH4B [binary]
k [binary]
R0dU/rJL0V6VkAp2bcCijZLJGQy [binary]
ZxX0nSmUTGMgxkhC4mx7O6f+laWW0bW9 [binary]
bBlfNfN+ulruztGfw6N/kb23Qrs4z068JhN/kb [binary]
wsF5IUDQ4fabY [binary] R
Is it PT?: PT M Powered on a Quad PC ..was FYI: iLife 08', iWork 08' and new iMacs released.
88Fq2bBkoTHRdhekaFwZP [binary]
R8o4Pg5k0dfg4Jjw7M2C+5PotTzyifxpMo4DPGWbMu36kmC1lur3V utqcxsZjl7ThSet1Oj4YjxTTOq51SOX6O1Hx8CX1ftz4Ie1nR7KJFDbTaokf Qx/KKpIS6FRE/Uz/goVA+F0VHysYjxxwE/0cxn628SxduvRBfdFV4fzlWdKW<br
/> [binary]
Mla8duyY2qgGB8bPkF7J/SPZ [binary]
Re: PT M Powered on a Quad PC ..was FYI: iLife 08', iWork 08' andnew iMacs released.
chhT6cZDg+dP/uRP [binary]
DluPGeBg2M5OA38dq [binary]
4BX2 [binary]<br
41HmPuPCXi//B57rrrnu4 [binary]
/YzoPFXR/0ADBEZRev1FPFe7dxcKp7I [binary]
[binary] hM
ybxtJL/od6pN5yty6F3KpUK [binary]
[binary]<br /
mTi6tjYqNtGU/bFQL/Ji0Sio7G+ [binary]
/ae+ [binary]
FbobxQh9p8lGBTLLF [binary]
CmCKWvU86YXiBcwmxx [binary]
Bl6SmWCo9Fdghe5gNb8DTUmAi3NSAg [binary]
QDKs1gUPGBMins46vyeUo [binary]
wYFE4EUHvx4SXBKi [binary]<br
[binary]<br
/> [binary]<br
stuff, and it really is a dream=20 come >>true >>>>to be able to move PARIS=20 forward. >>>> >>>>I've sent you a couple = of=20 emails, but I have a feeling that my=20 messages >>>get >>>>killed by your spam=20 filter. I would love to work on the precision=20 limiter, >>>>and It would be a huge help to have the = wires code=20 to look at. One of >the >>>>things I still have = no clue=20 about (among many) is how the routing works. >>>> I = would=20 really, really, love to add a side chain to a compressor,=20 and >>I >>>>think that the wires code would be = a huge=20 help. >>>> >>>>Thanks again for=20 = everything! >>>> >>>>Mike >>>&g= t; >>>>PS=20 - I don't know if you've seen my little site at ensoniq.ca, but=20 you've >>>>got a very special thanks right at the=20 = top. >>>> >>>> >>>> >&= gt;>>"chuck=20 duffy" <c@c.com>=20 = wrote: >>>>> >>>>>Mike, >>&g= t;>> >>>>>The=20 Mac stuff is built under Code Warrior, not visual C++. It's a=20 real >>>>nightmare, >>>>>and if you = think it=20 was hard to grok the Visual C++ side, think=20 about >>doing >>>>>it with no reference = projects.=20 = Yikes. >>>>> >>>>>Chuck >>&g= t;>> >>>>> "Mike=20 Mullin" <<A=20 = href=3D"mailto:lunarlordship@sympatico.ca">lunarlordship@sympatico.ca= >=20 wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>I'm in = and=20 thanks=20 = Mike. >>>>>>cheers, >>>>>>Mike = Mullin >>>>>> >>>>>>"Gantt = Kushner"=20 <ganttmann@comcast.net>=20 = wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>&
;>>> I would really, really, love to add a side chain to a compressor, = >and > >>I > >>>>think that the wires code would be a huge help. > >>>> > >>>>Thanks again for everything! > >>>> > >>>>Mike &g