The PARIS Forums - RDF feed
type: channel
items: Is it possible to automate submix master from c-16
items: Re: Is it possible to automate submix master from c-16

Is it possible to automate submix master from c-16
type: item
description: m0dk4OUZ67p/D53uOK qQndXndK+8oqWlml8M1v2cfuOev0ttylAkckr4cR7F3CItsDKSA2GURj5Sdg VNrHOec/spLm5lD20e+RSscrOVmKqxeQiRSgVZFwgBb7qAooyd3SXJ86VZFD
creator: Kim W nowayknown
date: 2007-01-08T09:38:55-00:00

Re: Is it possible to automate submix master from c-16
type: item
creator: Robert Arsenault
date: 2007-01-08T12:53:18-00:00

Re: Is it possible to automate submix master from c-16
type: item
description: bW+oQRar4bit2NxsKq0tzBqLWsC3Ekzh [binary]
creator: sdfkjgh
date: 2007-01-08T14:08:35-00:00

Re: Is it possible to automate submix master from c-16
type: item
description: ro Tools, Neundo/Cubase/Sonar/Logic Controller >>Nice Comps/EQs on every channel >>(8) SPX-1000's DSP proc
creator: Robert Arsenault
date: 2007-01-08T14:42:28-00:00

Re: Is it possible to automate submix master from c-16
type: item
creator: Rod Lincoln
date: 2007-01-08T15:14:19-00:00

Re: Is it possible to automate submix master from c-16
type: item
description: Ldppnia91bxx4Shuoo7fxF [binary]
creator: Rod Lincoln
date: 2007-01-08T15:18:06-00:00

Re: Is it possible to automate submix master from c-16
type: item
description: [binary] ---=_linux45bdcc80--Looks like he needs some real asborbers as apposed to the auralex stuff he has...bass traps wouldn't hurt either Realtraps : http://www.realtraps.com/ Ready Acoustics: http://www.readyacoustics.com/ Modular Acoustics: http://www.modularacoustics.com/ John L Sayers Acoustics forum: http://www.johnlsayers.com/ Recording.org acoustics forum: http://www.modularacoustics.com/ General info: http://forum.studiotips.com/ Bottom line here is if you can find 3" rigid insulation (olive coloured) wrap it it a light cloth and hang the panels in the room roughly 3" off the walls and ceilings you'll save yourself a ton of money. cost for my layout was a little over $500 CDN Don "Dimitrios" <musurgio@otenet.gr> wrote in message news:45bdc60e@linux... > > I will post two pictures dictating the appearnace of the friend's studio > that > has the over midrange problem with whatever they record and all things > sound > midrangey through the Genelec monitors. > Note that he uses Neumann M149 thru the hybrid Millenia Media (tube and > solid > state) that are considered as world class machines. > He uses a RME Fire800 card and Nuendo. > I would appreciatte and wall treatment propositions to tam this mid > frequencies > when recording and THE LACK OF BASS when montoring !!! > Thanks. > Dimitrios If you'd like some photos email me DOn "Don Nafe" <dnafe@magma.ca> wrote in message news:45bddccf@linux... > Looks like he needs some real asborbers as apposed to the auralex stuff he > has...bass traps wouldn't hurt either > > > Realtraps : http://www.realtraps.com/ > > Ready Acoustics: http://www.readyacoustics.com/ > > Modular Acoustics: http://www.modularacoustics.com/ > > > John L Sayers Acoustics forum: http://www.johnlsayers.com/ > > Recording.org acoustics forum: http://www.modularacoustics.com/ > > General info: http://forum.studiotips.com/ > > Bottom line here is if you can find 3" rigid insulation (olive coloured) > wrap it it a light cloth and hang the panels…
creator: no
date: 2007-01-08T15:26:02-00:00

Re: Is it possible to automate submix master from c-16
type: item
description: essors (REVerbs, Delays, Chorus.etc) >>Some of the sweetest (24) Mic pres you'll find >>All in a foot print that keeps the Engineer/Operator right in >>front of the mix..There's a ton more features.. >> >>I had a chance (2years) ago to take the then Tascam 3200 for week session >>spin. Due to the fact that no body in our area had a O2r/96, we rented >>the tascam.. Man, to my ears and others, the Tascam delivers the goods. >I >>would have to say that the Tascam 3200 sonics was more "thick" than the >DM2000. >>Different converters and clocks.. But, we mananged to get thru a sesion >without >>opening the manual!! >>You're not going to do that with the Yammys.. he 3200 had full eq and dynamics >>on every channel as well as I think 4 DSP processors for Verbs and dleays >>chorus FX.. The verbs were the star of this board. The algo's were from >TC!! >>the verb masters. Man, these verbs sounded like our TC 3000 ..really!!. >The >>Eqs were usuable as are the Comps/Lim..We click on the DAW controller layer >>button, scrolled to the DAW template (Pro Tools)..Boom!! "Houston We have >>Controll".. That easy.. We had transport, channel faders and Master faders >>and edit scroll.. To be honest, we probable had more functions,but like >I >>stated earlier, we had not read the manual.. >>Oh well. >> >>Like I told James, I'm looking seriously @ the DM4800 X2 for my Home studio..To >>host Both Nuendo & Pro Tools...AND yes, Liek BrianT does in Houston, Paris >>will be used a he master summing mixer/recorder.. >> >>The
creator: wutever
date: 2007-01-08T15:37:18-00:00

Re: Is it possible to automate submix master from c-16
type: item
description: DM3200/4800 can't be beat in their price range. They have the sound, >>looks, and product maturity. Tascam knew they had a winner with the DM24,then >>knocked the ball out of the park with the DM3200, and now DM 4800.. >> >>Now that it's official that Mackie has dropped the Ball with the DXB(20K >>Plus), now selling are drastic discounts. T
creator: Rod Lincoln
date: 2007-01-08T15:55:50-00:00

Re: Is it possible to automate submix master from c-16
type: item
description: t;>they don't break and are not horribly non-intuitive. >>> >>>Thanks again, >>>Jon >>> >>>"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>By the way, the mic pres on the DM-32 and DM-48 are greatly improved and >>>vary >>>>usable. It was only the DM-24 that had the problems. >>>> >>>>James >>>> >>>>"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>Hey Jon!<
creator: Rob Arsenault
date: 2007-01-08T20:00:29-00:00

Re: Is it possible to automate submix master from c-16
type: item
description: nt(s), instead of summing out >of the 3200..you can... > >Another way.. 3200 out via SP/Dif. into Paris Mec/442 SP/dif..for just a >stereo sum .. Again, good sound. > >3200 master (analog outs) into Paris MEC/442.. 24bit(input Card)..then 24bit >out card..to master or internal bounce.. > >You can't loose either way you go.. Grat choice!! >P.S. Put into an Argosy!!! :) >take care. > >- 3200 out (Adat x 2) 16 lightpipes stems into MEC (with 2 adat cards).. >For stem mixing. Very cool.. Very good sound. and provides a means of Matering >within Paris. > >"Jon Jiles" <nojij@yahoo.com> wrote: >> >>Wow!!!! >> >>That's a pretty ringing endorsement LaMont!!!! >> >>I'm definitely leaning towards the 3200 and Cubase 4. The only client in >>my studio
creator: Rod Lincoln
date: 2007-01-09T04:06:03-00:00