Re: you guys are still using paris... WOW!
br /> [binary]
oFP3CwYSMRaLWwZbZILjllZ9yZJJfa [binary]<
Fx8Qfhra25jsPFGuatdmE20c+kfD [binary]
8tbY [binary]
LnV57u5t7nRrPZYO8cUa6wj3CKrzI [binary]
ZtUKdSVo04S/dx55S5pySvZcsk6jjppJJJN817 [binary]
7WfM+ve3blVvX5lV [binary]
Xw++MPgPxTrL6f4Z8fTT+ [binary]
/> [binary]
NnuUedshlUeXySxAcOjF8/c1 [binary]
1n4h+F [binary]
[binary]<br /
zh8N/gjqfi20jn8H+KZvGE2uaRp5vbTU1vZ/Gl [binary]
Cables - Was: you guys are still using paris... WOW!
is me and I'm really just trying to get to a simpler workflow >,for >>the songwriting end of things, and still achieve quality results at the >end >>of the process. >> >>Can you eplain to me in a little more detail how you (and apparently BT) >>would be/are using Paris as the master summing mixer/recorder in this scenario? >> >>I've currently got Cubase SX3 lightpiped into Paris via a RME 9652 ( a mini-Deej >>set-up if, you will) but being a guy who only gets to work on my stuff in >>the evenings after work or on the weekends, the opportunity for confusion
Re: Cables - Was: you guys are still using paris... WOW!
cribe really unless you hear it. It's almost like adding additional width to the soundstage while rolling off the top end. I know that sorta' describes what some compressors do, but the Cubase summing bus, to my ears, sounds compressed and harsh, lacking clarity, without some pretty major gainstaging work done at many levels. The 5042 takes that cluttered sounding harshness right out of the equation and the bus less crowded/compressed when this is strapped across it. deej "Neil" <OIUOIU@OIU.com> wrote in message news:45be4525$1@linux... > > "DJ" <www.aarrrrggghhh!!!.com> wrote: >>There is a definite change in the high end with this. *bright & shiny* >>changes to *warm & fuzzy* but it doesn't sound fuzzy as in distorted.just > >>sorta softer around the edges. the 7.5ips setting ain't the dope. 15ips &gt