that can allow for up to 16 >>>channels/submixes of passive analog summing (or if not that, at >>>least DSP summing through something other than the PC's CPU) >>>your box & return to 2 new channels in the DAW app - if you can >>>do onboard DSP EFX, you can do onboard summing, too, yes sir >
>>you KNOW you can! >>>***Throw in a copy of CubaseLE if you wanna... no need for a >>>complete/full-out app like SX or Nuendo - people can indeed buy >>>that separately if they want. >>>*** MIDI i/o... duh. >>>***Absolutely make it expandable to be able to easily link 2 >>>or more if someone needs more than 16 analog i/o's at once. >>>Encourages people to buy another if they ever want to go that >>>route anyway. >>>***It should be PCI-based, not Firewire or USB. One card. >>>Expansion units can be Firewired together via ports on the >>>units themselves, and routed through the same card. Maybe allow >>>for a max of 2 units per card to keep costs down... anyone >>>needing more than 32 analog i/o's at once will no doubt be in a >>>situation where they can go with PCI expansion chassis anyway. >>> >>>Price point should be ~$1,200 to $1,500, street. >>> >>>Can you imagine how many of these they could - and more >>>importantly WOULD - sell? >>> >>>I think it can be done for that price point - I mean look at >>>various units like the EMu 1812, the TC unit I just linked to >>>above, and the RME Multiface... all those units have various & >>>sundry of the features I mentioned for around HALF that price >>>(Multiface has 8 analog i/o's, plus other digital options, & >>>word clock, but no onboard DSP... Emu & TC units have half-ass >>>versions of less i/o's and one has no word clock, but both DO >>>have DSP EFX) how hard would it be to incorporate all of these >>>features I mentioned for twice to slightly more than twice the >>>price? >>> >>>I think the 16-minimum channels of straight-up analog i/o is the >>>biggest feature set that's missing from a lot of the half- >>>rack half-asses out there... you can do a full rock/pop/country >>>band with 16 in's - not a big huge major-label-type session >>>with top & bottom snare mics; front, back & outfront kick mics, >>>plus ambient room mics & a PZM taped to the wall or the >>>drummer's T-Shirt, plus five channels of bass & 19 channels of >>>guitar amp mics, but then the people who are doing those are >>>MOSTLY (not all, but) MOSTLY on PT systems anyway, or if >>>something like what I'm discussing were available, they could >>>just buy TWO of these units. My point is, if something like >>>this were available, with ONE unit, and no fucking around >>>trying to lightpipe & wordclock all kinds of digicrap together, >>>you could do basic tracks that looked like: >>> >>>1.) Kick >>>2.) Snare Top >>>3.) Snare Bottom >>>4.) HiHat >>>5.) OH-Right >>>6.) OH-Left >>>7.) Drum Room/Ambient Right >>>8.) Drum Room/Ambient Left >>>9.) Bass D.I. >>>10.) Bass mic'ed >>>11.) Guitar 1a >>>12.) Guitar 1b >>>13.) Guitar 2a (or Piano Lo/Keys Right) >>>14.) Guitar 2b (or Piano Hi/Keys Left) >>>15.) Scratch Vox >>>16.) Cowbell >>> >>>Want to spot-mic your toms, too? OK, maybe only use 1 guitar >>>for the basic trax & drop the cowbell if you need to & you >>>can't stereo submix your toms into to two channels, but you >>>get the idea, right? With 16 pure analog i/o you don't have to >>>lightpipe or SPDIF anything in, you can use all your "BOOTEEK" >>>mic pres like your Massenbergs & your Chandlers & your Great >>>Rivers, etc - none of which come with digital i/o's - and still &gt
om> wrote: >>> About six years ago or so, I spoke to Max M. about them building a two > or >>> three space rack with 16 mic pres on combo connecters with 16 inserts, > 16 >>> out put and 16 channels of 24 bit Adat light Pipe I/O, and 16 24bit SP/DIF >>> I/Os. I tried to convince EMU that Paris would be a more complete and > professional >>> system with mic pres with inserts and 24bit Adat light pipe I/O and 16 > SP/DIFs. >>> L
ater at a NAMM show, I talked Max in to walking with me over to see Malcolm >>> Toft MTA and Rick Nafi at Presonus, about OEMing their mic pres. Max's >> though >>> that Mic pres might be too subjective. He told me for quite some time > after >>> that, that they were considering building it and said several times stated >>> that it was discussed in their internal meetings. He even called it the >>> Paris Fire Station. I believe now, like many things he told me, it was >> just >>> lies to keep me pacified, until they could sell off all their inventory >> of >>> Paris hardware. >>> >>> I find it kind of funny that Malcolm Toft joined Ted Fletchers company > after >>> that and EMU OEMed their mic pres for the new EMU hardware. I want to > think >>> I made that connection. >>> >>> If you really want this product, you can make it happen by calling manufactures >>> and telling them what you want, just pick wisely! If you get enough people >>> to call over time things will happen. The price is another story. >>> >>> Many years ago, I told the drum hardware designer at Alesis, that I wanted >>> a drum module with dry drum sounds so I could effect them the way I wanted >>> in the studio. I also told them that I wanted a built in effect processor >>> for live use and studio work. I also wanted more triggers, more outputs, >>> headphone output with volume knob, and a audio in put so I could practice >>> to music. To my surprise, they built it in the DM PRO drum module. >>> >>> I made many suggestions to Greg Mackie that became products. Only problem >>> was, the ideas were bastardize, sliced and diced in to multiple products >>> and they charged three to four times more than I suggested for each product. >>> These companies want to slice and dice every thing and make big bucks. >>> If you want it all it's an expensive add on. I've talked to many of them >>> as a dealer, they think they can make more money selling little recording >>> boxes to bedroom guitar players or DJs. They think and their marketing >> data >>> shows that they can make more money selling the little boxes than big DAWs. >>> >>> >>> The attitude is, if you want to play in the big time, you'll go with PT, >>> SX, or Nuendo with third party hardware. Nobody really wants to go up > against >>> PT because it's already established in the market. >>> >>> The other issue is hardware becoming obsolete too quickly. Building DSPs >>> in to a system is a bit of a risk. They think native systems are good > enough, >>> and that is what most people want, and if they need more, like systems > with >>> DSPs, that PT already fills that Pro end of the market. >>> >>> However if enough people talk to these companies, something will happen. >>> >>> That's my 0.02 >>> >>> James >>> >>> "Neil" <OIUOIU@.com> wrote: >>>> Been researching this one a bit... >>>> >>>> http://www.tcelectronic.com/Default.asp?Id=7618 >>>> >>>> Seems pretty good, has onboard DSP, taking a load off your >>>> CPU... has a nice monitoring interface - simpler than TotalMix, >>>> coupla mic inputs & DI's, as well, BUT... only has 4 balanced >>>> analog i/o's... so you gotta buy 4 of 'em to do 16 channels >>>> pure. ALSO... no BNC/word clock... WTF? Trying to get >>>> prorietary on us with a unit lik
br /> >>>> muthafuckin' have, spend more than I muthafucking have again >>>> two years later"... >>>> >>>> ... so why hasn't somebody done this? THIS is the market we're >>>> all in, right? Those features at that price point? Wouldn't we >>>> all pay it? Tomorrow, first thing in the morning? Wouldn't >>>> about at least a quarter million other people that we don't >>>> even know about do the same? And it can be done (obviously, >>>> look at the half-assed feature sets at half the price that if >>>> combined, could add up to this type of unit at that price >>>> point!). >>>> >>>> So why? WHY hasn't anyone done this? >>&
d said several times stated >that it was discussed in their internal meetings. He even called it the >Paris Fire Station. I believe now, like many things he told me, it was just >lies to keep me pacified, until they could sell off all their inventory of >Paris hardware. > >I find it kind of funny that Malcolm Toft joined Ted Fletchers company after >that and EMU OEMed their mic pres for the new EMU hardware. I want to think >I made that connection. > >If you really want this product, you can make it happen by calling manufactures >and telling them what you want, just pick wisely! If you get enough people >to call over time things will happen. The price is another story. > >Many years ago, I told the drum hardware designer at Alesis, that I wanted >a drum module with dry drum sounds so I could effect them the way I wanted >in the studio. I also told them that I wanted a built in effect processor >for live use and studio work. I also wanted more triggers, more outputs, >headphone output with volume knob, and a audio in put so I could practice >to music. To my surprise, they built it in the DM PRO drum module. > >I made many suggestions to Greg Mackie that became products. Only problem >was, the ideas were bastardize, sliced and diced in to multiple products >and they charged three to four times more than I suggested for each product. > These companies want to slice and dice every thing and make big bucks. >If you want it all it's an expensive add on. I've talked to many of them >as a dealer, they think they can make more money selling little recording >boxes to bedroom guitar players or DJs. They think and their marketing data >shows that they can make more money selling the little boxes than big DAWs. > > >The attitude is, if you want to play in the big time, you'll go with PT, >SX, or Nuendo with third party hardware. Nobody really wants to go up against >PT because it's already established in the market. > >The other issue is hardware becoming obsolete too quickly. Building DSPs >in to a system is a bit of a risk. They think native systems are good enough, >and that is what most people want, and if they need more, like systems with >DSPs, that PT already fills that Pro end of the market. > >However if enough people talk to these companies, something will happen. ><b
going a full rack space long & 2 rack spaces deep, >>fer pete's sakes! Not everything has to be a single-space >>and/or a half-racker! >>*** It should have on-board DSP effects - like the TC unit or >>the new/soon to be discontinued EMU stuff, for example. >>price as sucky ones - yes, you can. >>*** It should have an ASIO driver that can allow for up to 16 >>channels/submixes of passive analog summing (or if not that, at >>least DSP summing through something other than the PC's CPU) >>your box & return to 2 new channels in the DAW app - if you can >>do onboard DSP EFX, you can do onboard summing, too, yes sir >>you KNOW you can! >>***Throw in a copy of CubaseLE if you wanna... no need for a >>complete/full-out app like SX or Nuendo - people can indeed buy >>that separately if they want. >>*** MIDI i/o... duh. >>***Absolutely make it expandable to be able to easily link 2 >>or more if someone needs more than 16 analog i/o's at once. >>Encourages people to buy another if they ever want to go that >>route anyway. >>***It should be PCI-based, not Firewire or USB. One card. >>Expansion units can be Firewired together via ports on the >>units themselves, and routed through the same card. Maybe allow >>for a max of 2 units per card to keep costs down... anyone >>needing more than 32 analog i/o's at once will no doubt be in a >>situation where they can go with PCI expansion chassis anyway. >> >>Price point should be ~$1,200 to $1,500, street. >> >>Can you imagine how many of these they could - and more >>importantly WOULD - sell? >><br /
ade that connection. >>> >>>If you really want this product, you can make it happen by calling manufactures >>>and telling them what you want, just pick wisely! If you get enough people >>>to call over time things will happen. The price is another story. >>> >>>Many years ago, I told the drum hardware designer at Alesis, that I wanted >>>a drum module with dry drum sounds so I could effect them the way I wanted >>>in the studio. I also told them that I wanted a built in effect processor >>>for live use and studio work. I also wanted more triggers, more outputs, >>>headphone output with volume knob, and a audio in put so I could practice >>>to music. To my surprise, they built it in the DM PRO drum module. >>> >>>I made many suggestions to Greg Mackie that became products. Only problem >>>was, the ideas were bastardize, sliced and diced in to multiple products >>>and they charged three to four times more than I suggested for each product. >>> These companies want to slice and dice every thing and make big bucks. >> >>>If you want it all it's an expensive add on. I've talked to many of them >>>as a dealer, they think they can make more money selling little recording >>>boxes to bedroom guitar players or DJs. They think and their marketing >>data >>>shows that they can make more money selling the little boxes than big DAWs. >>> >>> >>>The attitude is, if you want to play in the big time, you'll go with PT, >>>SX, or Nuendo with third party hardware. Nobody really wants to go up >against >>>PT because it's already established in the market. >>> >>>The other issue is hardware b
/www.tcelectronic.com/Default.asp?Id=7618" target="_blank">http://www.tcelectronic.com/Default.asp?Id=7618 >>>> >>>>Seems pretty good, has onboard DSP, taking a load off your >>>>CPU... has a nice monitoring interface - simpler than TotalMix, >>>>coupla mic inputs & DI's, as well, BUT... only has 4 balanced >>>>analog i/o's... so you gotta buy 4 of 'em to do 16 channels >>>>pure. ALSO... no BNC/word clock... WTF? Trying to get >>>>prorietary on us with a unit like THIS!!!??? We have to ONLY >>>>use these together with each other? Can't sync anything-digital- >>>>else??? >>>> >>>>Handy, nice for "semiprosumer" applications, but another >>>>opportunity to really go after the pro market wasted, IMO - >>>>they have the technology, they have the tinker toy set, they >>>>just didn't "go pro" with it... Paris didn't either at the >>>>time, and neither did Emu with their 1812/1212, etc - although >>>>the onboard DSP & good convertors plus a few other features >>>>coulda got them there. Is everyone afraid of alsihad? Is that >>>>it? Is that why all things like this come out as small-time >>>>entrants targeted at price points in the home recording level >>>>only? >>>> >>>>As the subject line says: Close, but no cigar. >>>> >>>>Here's the thing... Yeah there are other options like MADI >>>>units that can get you 1,569,878,760,000 channels of i/o, but >>>>who needs that much, and then you also need a half dozen >>>>lightpipe interfaces, and stringing all that shit together & >>>>making it hum is mickey-mouse, too, IMO. >>>> >>>>Someone needs to developthe following: >>>> >>>>***A superb convertor box with 16 channels in & out, throw in a >>>>couple of d.i./mic pres & lightpipe/SPDIF ports if you want, >>>>but really what the world needs is more single-box 16 channel >>>>interfaces.. with 16 channels of pure analog i/o. Don't be >>>>afraid of going a full rack space long & 2 rack spaces deep, >>>>fer pete's sakes! Not everything has to be a single-space >>>>and/or a half-racker! >>>>*** It should have on-board DSP effects - like the TC unit or >>>>the new/soon to be discontinued EMU stuff, for example. >>>>price as sucky ones - yes, you can. >>>>*** It should have an ASIO driver that can allow for up to 16 >>>>channels/submixes of passive analog summing (or if not that, at >>>>least DSP summing through something other than the PC's CPU) >>>>your box & return to 2 new channels in the DAW app - if you can >>>>do onboard DSP EFX, you can do onboard summing, too, yes sir<br /
hat can allow for up to 16 >>>>>channels/submixes of passive analog summing (or if not that, at >>>>>least DSP summing through something other than the PC's CPU) >>>>>your box & return to 2 new channels in the DAW app - if you can >>>>>do onboard DSP EFX, you can do onboard summing, too, yes sir >>>>>you KNOW you can! >>>>>***Throw in a copy of CubaseLE if you wanna... no need for a >>>>>complete/full-out app like SX or Nuendo - people can indeed buy >>>>>that separately if they want. >>>>>*** MIDI i/o... duh. >>>>>***Absolutely make it expandable to be able to easily link 2 >>>>>or more if someone needs more than 16 analog i/o's at once. >>>>>Encourages people to buy another if they ever want to go that >>>>>route anyway. >>>>>***It should be PCI-based, not Firewire or USB. One card. >>>>>Expansion units can be Firewired together via ports on the >>>>>units themselves, and routed through the same card. Maybe allow >>>>>for a max of 2 units per card to keep costs down... anyone >>>>>needing more than 32 analog i/o's at once will no doubt be in a >>>>>situation where they can go with PCI expansion chassis anyway. >>>>> >>>>>Price point should be ~$1,200 to $1,500, street. >>>>> >>>>>Can you imagine how many of these they could - and more >>>>>importantly WOULD - sell? >>>>> >>>>>I think it can be done for that price point - I mean look at >>>>>various units like the EMu 1812, the TC unit I just linked to >>>>>above, and the RME Multiface... all those units have various & >>>>>sundry of the features I mentioned for around HALF that price >>>>>(Multiface has 8 analog i/o's, plus other digital options, & >>>>>word clock, but no onboard DSP... Emu & TC units have half-ass >>>>>versions of less i/o's and one has no word clock, but both DO >>>>>have DSP EFX) how hard would it be to incorporate all of these >>>>>features I mentioned for twice to slightly more than twice the >>>>>price? >>>>> >>>>>I think the 16-minimum channels of straight-up analog i/o is the >>>>>biggest feature set that's missing from a lot of the half- >>>>>rack half-asses out there... you can do a full rock/pop/country >>>>>band with 16 in's - not a big huge major-label-type session >>>>>with top & bottom snare mics; front, back & outfront kick mics, >>>>>plus ambient room mics & a PZM taped to the wall or the >>>>>drummer's T-Shirt, plus five channels of bass & 19 channels of >>>>>guitar amp mics, but then the people who are doing those are >>>>>MOSTLY (not all, but) MOSTLY on PT systems anyway, or if >>>>>something like what I'm discussing were available, they could >>>>>just buy TWO of these units. My point is, if something like >>>>>this were available, with ONE unit, and no fucking around >>>>>trying to lightpipe & wordclock all kinds of digicrap together, >>>>>you could do basic tracks that looked like: >>>>> >>>>>1.) Kick >>>>>2.) Snare Top >>>>>3.) Snare Bottom >>>>>4.) HiHat >>>>>5.) OH-Right >>>>>6.) OH-Left >>>>>7.) Drum Room/Ambient Right >>>>>8.) Drum Room/Ambient Left >>>>>9.) Bass D.I. >>>>>10.) Bass mic'ed >>>>>11.) Guitar 1a >>>>>12.) Guitar 1b >>>>>13.) Guitar 2a (or Piano Lo/Keys Right) >>>>>14.) Guitar 2b (or Piano Hi/Keys Left) >>>>>15.) Scratch Vox >>>>>16.) Cowbell >>>>> >>>>>Want to spot-mic your toms, too? OK, maybe only use 1 guitar >>>>>for the basic trax & drop the cowbell if you need to & you >>>>>can't stereo submix your toms into to two channels, but you >>>>>get the idea, right? With 16 pure analog i/o you don't have to >>>>>lightpipe or SPDIF anything in, you can use all your "BOOTEEK" >>>>>mic pres like your Massenbergs & your Chandlers & your Great >>>>>Rivers, etc - none of which come with digital i/o's - and still >>>>>have a GREAT setup for a full-on basic tracking session! >>>>> >>>>>Then after you track all your basics, you've got your DSP-no- >>>>>latency 'verb for the vocalist to hear as he's doing his real >>>>>takes, and DSP summing for mixdown time, just like Gay Paree >>>>>without the fucking mimes & the cats & the 17-day wait to >>>>>reauthorize like the poor couple of sonsofbitches who we've >>>>>seen posting the last few days; and just like PTHD, but without >>>>>being trapped into the endless cycle of "spend more than I >>>>>muthafuckin' have, spend more than I muthafucking have again >>>>>two years later"... >>>>> >>>>>... so why hasn't somebody done this? THIS is the market we're >>>>>all in, right? Those features at that price point? Wouldn't we >>>>>all pay it? Tomorrow, first thing in the morning? Wouldn't >>>>>about at least a quarter million other people that we don't >>>>>even know about do the same? And it can be done (obviously, >>>>>look at the half-assed feature sets at half the price that if >>>>>combined, could add up to this type of unit at that price >>>>>point!). >>>>> >>>>>So why? WHY hasn't anyone done this? >>>>> >>>>><Rant off> >>>> >>> >> >After watching this excellent instructional video on Rock drumming just once, I now can truly play rock drums like the pros! Thanks Mike! Before this video I was doomed to a life of mediocrity. James "John Macy" <spamlessjohn@johnmacy.com> wrote: > >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yCzW4fVRViIHi, Just in case anyone missed it, I've got a PARIS system for sale over on the paris-forsale side.....beautiful. Hey Rod, didja get a look at this one? AA "John Macy" <spamlessjohn@johnmacy.com> wrote in message news:454a94ba$1@linux... > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yCzW4fVRViI"JLS" < >I have bought 3.0 and is trying to a get the license. > I sent them a mail 10 days ago and still no response. > > Are they usually that slow? > > Their website says 7 days. > > JS Now it's 12 days. No response.....ain't that the truth. we were out trick or treating with the granddaughter and family when our daughter runs into a woman she hasn't seen in 35 years when she was 5. how the hell they recognized each other i'll never know. On Thu, 02 Nov 2006 20:28:37 -0500, John <no@no.com> wrote: >So, Dale Bradley decides to buy my C16. Yay. Turns out he's from Eugene >Oregon. Hey, I lived there once on Sherwood Place. Turns out he has a >brother on Sherwood Place. Hey, my landlord's name was Bradley. > >His DAD was my landlord for 4 years from 88 to 92 and it's his brothers >house and are great people! FAWK ! > >I have these amazing coincedences about 3 or 4 times a year and this one >takes the cake. I call them brief religious experiences. Wild !That is unbelievable rick! You guys must have been amazed! rick wrote: > ain't that the truth. we were out trick or treating with the > granddaughter and family when our daughter runs into a woman she > hasn't seen in 35 years when she was 5. how the hell they recognized > each other i'll never know. > > On Thu, 02 Nov 2006 20:28:37 -0500, John <no@no.com> wrote: > >> So, Dale Bradley decides to buy my C16. Yay. Turns out he's from Eugene >> Oregon. Hey, I lived there once on Sherwood Place. Turns out he has a >> brother on Sherwood Place. Hey, my landlord's name was Bradley. >> >> His DAD was my landlord for 4 years from 88 to 92 and it's his brothers >> house and are great people! FAWK ! >> >> I have these amazing coincedences about 3 or 4 times a year and this one >> takes the cake. I call them brief religious experiences. Wild ! >Anyone try the Chandler plug in Paris yet?had to hit that vodka to calm my shattered...something... On Fri, 03 Nov 2006 07:04:15 -0500, John <no@no.com> wrote: >That is unbelievable rick! You guys must have been amazed! > >rick wrote: >> ain't that the truth. we were out trick or treating with the >> granddaughter and family when our daughter runs into a woman she >> hasn't seen in 35 years when she was 5. how the hell they recognized >> each other i'll never know. >> >> On Thu, 02 Nov 2006 20:28:37 -0500, John <no@no.com> wrote: >> >>> So, Dale Bradley decides to buy my C16. Yay. Turns out he's from Eugene >>> Oregon. Hey, I lived there once on Sherwood Place. Turns out he has a >>> brother on Sherwood Place. Hey, my landlord's name was Bradley. >>> >>> His DAD was my landlord for 4 years from 88 to 92 and it's his brothers >>> house and are great people! FAWK ! >>> >>> I have these amazing
jens.sundbo@NOSPAMvkbb.no" target="_blank">jens.sundbo@NOSPAMvkbb.no&g= t;=20 wrote in message <A=20 href=3D"news:454afd59@linux">news:454afd59@linux... "JLS" = &lt;=20 &gt;I have bought 3.0&nbsp; and is trying to a get the = license. &gt; I sent=20 them a mail 10 days ago and still no response. &gt; &gt; Are = they=20 usually that slow? &gt; &gt; Their website says 7 = days. &gt; &gt;=20 JS Now it's 12 days. No = response..... I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam, = and=20 you? <A=20 href=3D"http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html">http://www.polesoft.com/refer= ..html&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; ------=_NextPart_000_0011_01C6FF4F.5AE38FC0--Did you remember to include you EDS serial number and 3.0 key numbers? They won't respond without both of those pieces of information. Mark "JLS" <jens.sundbo@NOSPAMvkbb.no> wrote: > >"JLS" < >I have bought 3.0 and is trying to a get the license. >> I sent them a mail 10 days ago and still no response. >> >> Are they usually that slow? >> >> Their website says 7 days. >> >> JS > > >Now it's 12 days. >No response..... > >This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ---=_linux454bb6c1 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Where's the beer? ---=_linux454bb6c1 Content-Type: image/jpeg; name="Canuk security.jpg" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="Canuk security.jpg" /9j/4AAQSkZJRgABAgEASABIAAD/4RS3RXhpZgAATU0AKgAAAAgABwESAAMA AAABAAEAAAEaAAUAAAABAAAAYgEbAAUAAAABAAAAagEoAAMAAAABAAIAAAEx AAIAAAAdAAAAcgEyAAIAAAAUAAAAj4dpAAQAAAABAAAApAAAANAAAABIAAAA AQAAAEgAAAABQWRvYmUgUGhvdG9zaG9wIEVsZW1lbnRzIDIuMAAyMDA2OjEx OjAzIDEzOjQ0OjI3AAAAA6ABAAMAAAAB//8AAKACAAQAAAABAAACgKADAAQA AAABAAABlwAAAAAAAAAGAQMAAwAAAAEABgAAARoABQAAAAEAAAEeARsABQAA AAEAAAEmASgAAwAAAAEAAgAAAgEABAAAAAEAAAEuAgIABAAAAAEAABOBAAAA AAAAAEgAAAABAAAASAAAAAH/2P/gABBKRklGAAECAQBIAEgAAP/tAAxBZG9i ZV9DTQAC/+4ADkFkb2JlAGSAAAAAAf/bAIQADAgICAkIDAkJDBELCgsRFQ8M DA8VGBMTFRMTGBEMDAwMDAwRDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwM DAENCwsNDg0QDg4QFA4ODhQUDg4ODhQRDAwMDAwREQwMDAwMDBEMDAwMDAwM [binary]
vZERhdGU8L2tleT4KCQkJ [binary] AQADAwMAAAABf/8AAQABAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAaAgAGQGQAAAAAAAgAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA4QklNA+0AAAAAABAASAAAAAEAAQBIAAAA AQABOEJJTQQmAAAAAAAOAAAAAAAAAAAAAD+AAAA4QklNBA0AAAAAAAQAAAAe OEJJTQQZAAAAAAAEAAAAHjhCSU0D8wAAAAAACQAAAAAAAAAAAQA4QklNBAoA AAAAAAEAADhCSU0nEAAAAAAACgABAAAAAAAAAAE4QklNA/UAAAAAAEgAL2Zm AAEAbGZmAAYAAAAAAAEAL2ZmAAEAoZmaAAYAAAAAAAEAMgAAAAEAWgAAAAYA AAAAAAEANQAAAAEALQAAAAYAAAAAAAE4QklNA/gAAAAAAHAAAP////////// //////////////////8D6AAAAAD/////////////////////////////A+gA AAAA/////////////////////////////wPoAAAAAP////////////////// //////////8D6AAAOEJJTQQIAAAAAAAQAAAAAQAAAkAAAAJAAAAAADhCSU0E HgAAAAAABAAAAAA4QklNBBoAAAAAA0sAAAAGAAAAAAAAAAAAAAGXAAACgAAA AAsAVQBuAHQAaQB0AGwAZQBkACAAMQAwAAAAAQAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAABAAAAAAAAAAAAAAKAAAABlwAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABAAAAAAAAAAAA [binary] DAwMDBERDAwMDAwMEQwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAz/wAAR CABRAIADASIAAhEBAxEB/90ABAAI/8QBPwAAAQUBAQEBAQEAAAAAAAAAAwAB AgQFBgcICQoLAQABBQEBAQEBAQAAAAAAAAABAAIDBAUGBwgJCgsQAAEEAQMC [binary]