Intel pledges 80-core chips in five years
> and you can store presets.&nbsp; = I'm new to it=20 but like it on everything I've tried so far.&nbsp; = Tom <br
Re: Intel pledges 80-core chips in five years
/> <BLOCKQUOTE=20 style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; = BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"> "Martin Harrington" &lt;<A=20 = href=3D"mailto:lendan@bigpond.net.au">lendan@bigpond.net.au&gt; = wrote in=20 message <A=20 = href=3D"news:452c22de$1@linux">news:452c22de$1@linux... Who = were=20 you then? -- Martin Harrington <A=20 = href=3D"http://www.lendanear-sound.com">www.lendanear-sound.com <B= R>"DJ"=20 &lt;<A = href=3D"mailto:notachance@net.net">notachance@net.net&gt; wrote=20 in message <A=20 = href=3D"news:452c19c9$1@linux">news:452c19c9$1@linux... &gt;=20 nope.......I wasn't me...
; "Jeremy Luzier" &lt;<A=20 href=3D"mailto:j.luzier@comcast.net">j.luzier@comcast.net&gt; = wrote in=20 message &gt; &gt; <A=20 href=3D"news:452c196e@linux">news:452c196e@linux... &gt; = &gt;&gt; was=20 anyone else under the impression the cambridge eq from uad=20 was really &gt; &gt;&gt; transparent? &gt; &gt;&gt; &gt;=20 &gt;&gt; &gt; &gt;&gt; &gt; &gt;&gt; &gt; &gt;&gt; &gt;=20 &gt; &gt; &gt; &gt; &gt; I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam, = and=20 you? <A=20 href=3D"http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html">http://www.polesoft.com/refer= ..html&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; ------=_NextPart_000_00A3_01C6ECC6.2E2452D0--I'm tellin' ya, go with the Sony MDR-V600's at Circuit City or the like... great sound, clear, and no leakage, right around 100 bucks retail. Neil "Brian Porick" <brianporick@hotmail.com> wrote: >Fellow PARISians, > >Do you have any recommendations for studi
o headphones? I'm looking at >buying a handful of pairs for musicians to wear while tracking. > >My priorities are: >1. Must be closed headphones (no leakage of click tracks) >2. Comfort (You've gotta be able to wear them for a couple of hours of >tracking, if need be) >3. Price (I'm hoping not to spend $200 a pair. I'll go as high as $150 if >I need to, but less than that would be even better.) >4. Sound quality (I'm not doing mixing on these, so as long as they're >relatively clean, that's fine.)<br
@4ax.com... > for 6 years i had not received more than 3 spams on my (seldom used) > yahoo account...and now i get 200 a day. at least hotmail has stayed > the same as it was. > > On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 09:29:10 -0600, Dedric Terry <dterry@keyofd.net> > wrote: > >> http://news.yahoo.com/s/macworld/20061009/tc_macworld/spamha us20061009_0 >> >>Brilliant. I guess spammers and email marketing companies have more >>rights >>than consumers. Yet again, individual/corporate rights supercede any >>sense >>of ethics. Interesting that the US leads the world in spam by about 3 to >>1, and we have yet to see any effective legislation or real effort put >>into >>stopping it. >This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_00C1_01C6ECC1.F68396A0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Nice to meet you. ;o) "Tom Bruhl" <arpegio@comcast.net> wrote in message = news:452c66e1$1@linux... I'm hallucinatin' dinosaurs. "DJ" <notachance@net.net> wrote in message news:452c65cd$1@linux... Hopefully the same I that me am now. ;o) "Martin Harrington" <lendan@bigpond.net.au> wrote in message
ef=3D"news:452c65cd$1@linux">news:452c65cd$1@linux... Hopefull= y the=20 same I that me am now. ;o) "Martin Harrington" = &lt;<A=20 href=3D"mailto:lendan@bigpond.net.au">lendan@bigpond.net.au&gt; = wrote in=20 message <A=20 href=3D"news:452c22de$1@linux">news:452c22de$1@linux... &gt; = Who were=20 you then? &gt; -- &gt; Martin Harrington &gt; <A=20 = href=3D"http://www.lendanear-sound.com">www.lendanear-sound.com &g= t; &gt;=20 "DJ" &lt;<A = href=3D"mailto:notachance@net.net">notachance@net.net&gt;=20 wrote in message <A=20 href=3D"news:452c19c9$1@linux">news:452c19c9$1@linux... &gt; = &gt;=20 nope.......I wasn't me... &gt; &gt; &gt; &gt; ;o) &gt; = &gt; &gt;=20 &gt; "Jeremy Luzier" &lt;<A=20 href=3D"mailto:j.luzier@comcast.net">j.luzier@comcast.net&gt; = wrote in=20 message &gt; &gt; <A=20 href=3D"news:452c196e@linux">news:452c196e@linux... &gt; = &gt;&gt; was=20 anyone else under the impression the cambridge eq from uad=20 was really &gt; &gt;&gt; transparent? &gt; &gt;&gt; &gt; = &gt;&gt; &gt; &gt;&gt; &gt; &gt;&
traight forward and quite versatile > >> > >>DOn > >> > >> > >>"EK Sound" <askme@nospam.com> wrote in message news:452d122a@linux... > >>> 64 tracks lets you out of all the light software, and latency compensation > > > >>> lets out a few more. I would say the new Studio 4 from Steinberg would > >be > >>> decent (or SX), once they patch it once or twice. > >>> > >>> pdf of features: http://knowledgebase.steinberg.de/158_1.html > >>> > >>> For interfaces, you can't go wrong with a pair of RME multi-face/PCI > > >>> cards. > >>> > >>> http://www.rme-audio.com/english/hdsp/multifa.htm > >>> > >>> Keep in mind, you may want to wait till they go PCI-e so you have some > > > >>> growth capability computer-wise. > >>> > >>> David. > >>> > >>> John wrote: > >>>> So, what's the least expensive system I can get with high quality sound, > >>>> latency compensation for vsts and able to do > 64 tracks with the pro > > > >>>> features > >>>> like Paris? If DJ pitches in, cost is no object but for now I need > > > >>>> cheap. > >>>> > >>>> 16 ins and outs would be nice > >>>> > >> > > >Which ones sound the best? "Don Nafe" <dnafe@magma.ca> wrote: >I wouldn't be so hasty to jump to conclusions...but it's your choice...get >your wallet out cause you're gonnan need it > >heehehehehehe > >Don > > >"John" <no@no.com> wrote in message news:452d3042$1@linux... >> >> I can't do things in their infancy anymore. I need something mature with >> plug in automation and latency compensation. Ideas ? >> I'm gonna check DJs garbage can and see what he's throwing out. >> >> John >> >> "Don Nafe" <dnafe@magma.ca> wrote: >>>Go check out Reaper and www.reaper.fm >>> >>>still in it's infancy - just out of beta testing but so far it's been a >> joy >>>to use, straight forward and quite versatile >>> >>>DOn
to:askme@nospam.com" target="_blank">askme@nospam.com> wrote in message news:452d122a@linux... >>>>> 64 tracks lets you out of all the light software, and latency >>>>> compensation >>> >>>>> lets out a few more. I would say the new Studio 4 from Steinberg would >>> be >>>>> decent (or SX), once they patch it once or twice. >>>>> >>>>> pdf of features: http://knowledgebase.steinberg.de/158_1.html >>>>> >>>>> For interfaces, you can't go wrong with a pa