The PARIS Forums - RDF feed
type: channel
items: More geek stuff-cascading digital signals through 3 x M-Audio Digipatch units.
items: Hehehe!!!!.....success!!!! I may need to sacrifice a chicken!!!!
items: Re: Hehehe!!!!.....success!!!! I may need to sacrifice a chicken!!!!
items: Re: Hehehe!!!!.....success!!!! I may need to sacrifice a Behringer!!!!
items: Re: More geek stuff-cascading digital signals through 3 x M-Audio Digipatch units.

More geek stuff-cascading digital signals through 3 x M-Audio Digipatch units.
type: item
description: PC (nerdy older guy) and MAC (young cute guy) facing camera, standing side by side >between two computer monitors >> >> >> >> MAC >> >> Hi, I'm a Mac. >> >> >> >> PC >> >> Hi, I'm a PC. >> >> >> >> MAC >> >> I'm into music, video, games, stuff like that . . . >> >> >> >> PC >> >> Wow! Music, video, and games? Coooool . . . Wish I could >do that . . . (winks at camera) >> >> >> >> MAC >> >> Yeah, and I'm really cute and hip-looking, too. >> >> >> >> PC >> >> Yes, you are. Do you have the 2GHz processor, or the 1.83? >> >> >> >> MAC >> >> Um . . . processor? >> >> >> >> PC >> >>
creator: Deej [1]
date: 2006-05-20T09:03:41-00:00

Hehehe!!!!.....success!!!! I may need to sacrifice a chicken!!!!
type: item
description: between two computer monitors. >> >>MAC >> >>Hi, I'm a Mac. >> >>PC >> >>And I'm a PC. >> >>MAC >> >>I used to be different than him, but now I'm being built >>like a PC with Intel chips & everything. >> >>PC >> >>Ummm... but you're still going to cost like three times as >>much as a PC? >> >>MAC >> >>Uhhh... Yeah! <winks at camera> > > FADE TO BLACKoops, sorryTry to make this file sound like the second shania file. Who's go the magic? Come on, help a brother out. http://tinyurl.com/qrcam You have a stereo pair, and kick,snare, hihat on separate wave files. Goal sound i'm going for http://tinyurl.com/gtacuMy humble opinion... Your snare needs a longer tail. It also needs to go down in pitch by about a tone or so. The kick needs more beater (I've eq'd some in, but that's always dodgy) and a nice tight bottom on it like the Shania one has. ....but here's my dodgy attempt in 10 minutes... http://www.yousendit.com/transfer.php?action=download&uf id=FD780B32378DCF5B Cheers, Kim. "John" <no@no.com> wrote: > >Try to make this file sound like the second shania file. Who's go the magic? > Come on, help a brother out. > >http://tinyurl.com/qrcam >You have a stereo pair, and kick,snare, hihat on separate wave files. > >Goal sound i'm going for >http://tinyurl.com/gtacu > > > >Yes, indeed. Jimmy "Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote and a nice tight bottom on it like the Shania one has."uptown jimmy" <johnson314@bellsouth.net> wrote: >Yes, indeed. ....or, indeed, like the one Shania has. ;o) > >Jimmy > > >"Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote > > and a nice tight bottom on it like the Shania one has. > > >ROTFLMA****'inAO!!!! ;oD "EK Sound" <askme@nospam.com> wrote in message news:4492ea34$<a href="mailto:1@l
creator: Deej [1]
date: 2006-05-20T17:48:25-00:00

Re: Hehehe!!!!.....success!!!! I may need to sacrifice a chicken!!!!
type: item
description: p gray dash. > Do you need a fancy dash?, I don't know but your definitely paying for it > in the price of the Cadillac! Do you need a computer with a fancy aluminum > alloy case?, I don't know but you are paying for it in the price of the Mac! > Macs also cost more because they are not mass produced in the quantities > that PCs are. It's like saying Ferraris suck because they cost five times > more than Cadillacs. > > There is other tangible and intangible value in the price of a Mac, such > as your time, Macs just work! Almost no down time, there's not much time > spent on trying to get things to work. What is your time worth? PC guys > here are constantly fussing with their PCs, IRQ conflicts, hardware conflicts, > dll file issues, driver issues, malicious code and other headaches. If > you want to fuss, cool, but time is money. > > I think the Mac drivers are better, and they're built in. No need to go searching > for the drivers. The iLife software rocks! Figure about $100.00 a program, > and then figure in that they actually work! There is no need for Anti Spyware > software, pop up blocking software. The need for anti virus software is > minimal, on a PC it is absolutely necessary if you are going on the internet > and down loading anything. Viruses still get buy the software on a PC, what > does time and lost data cost? On a mac you don't have to be a security administrator. > Macs are harder to hack. > > The united States Navy, Hues aircraft and Boeing did cost of operation studies > in the past. It was something like 6 IT guys per 100 PCs to maintain and > administrate. It was 1 IT guy per 100 plus Macs to maintain and administrate. > Because of the lower labor costs, the over all costs for business is lower > with macs. > > So Macs do cost more initially, but that cost is offset by the time saved > and the rest of the above mentioned. You get what you pay for! > > I think the MacBook is a reasonable deal for what you get. > > I'm not saying a Mac is perfe…
creator: DC
date: 2006-05-20T19:11:04-00:00

Re: Hehehe!!!!.....success!!!! I may need to sacrifice a Behringer!!!!
type: item
description: t;>>>>>> Cadillac has a simulated birds eye maple dash, the KIA has a cheap > gray >>>>>> dash. >>>>>>> Do you need a fancy dash?, I don't know but your definitely paying > for >>>>> it >>>>>>> in the price of the Cadillac! Do you need a computer with a fancy >>>>>> aluminum >>>>>>> alloy case?, I don't know but you are paying for it in the price of > the >>>>>> Mac! >>>>>>> Macs also cost more because they are not mass produced in the >>>> quantities >>>>>>> that PCs are. It's like saying Ferraris suck because they cost five >>>> times >>>>>>> more than Cadillacs. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> There is other tangibl
creator: Deej [1]
date: 2006-05-20T19:14:19-00:00

Re: Hehehe!!!!.....success!!!! I may need to sacrifice a Behringer!!!!
type: item
description: ow I'm being built >>>>>>>>> like a PC with Intel chips & everything. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> PC >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Ummm... but you're still going to cost like three times as >>>>>>>>> much as a PC? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> MAC >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Uhhh... Yeah! <winks at camera> >>>>>>>> FADE TO BLACK > >Chech out these to guys jamming with only bass and drum machine. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sbReYWXSyjA&search=alvin% 20millsThanks for the info on this. I haven't ruled out getting a Macintel in the future. It would be nice to be able to access more RAM in Cubase SX. ;o) "Jamie K" <Meta@Dimensional.com> wrote in message news:44944b6c@linux... > > On the Mac it's sorta 64 bit but not really. IOW, OSX GUI and OSX apps > are currently 32 bit but there is underlying support for access to > larger amounts of RAM, which as you p
creator: Martin Harrington
date: 2006-05-21T00:34:02-00:00

Re: Hehehe!!!!.....success!!!! I may need to sacrifice a Behringer!!!!
type: item
description: oint out is a great benefit. > > Being able to run everything on one computer and within one application > is a huge workflow benefit. Whether a native system will give you the > sound you want, I can't say. But using all native w/Logic does sound > good to me, and my clients haven't complained. :^) > > I don't know how efficient Cubase is on OSX. When I was evaluating > sequencers for the Mac, Logic got my $$. But Logic was efficient before > Apple bought out eMagic, and it was efficient on other platforms before > it came to OSX. There's no reason Cubase couldn't be efficient on OSX > with core audio. Digital Performer also has a lot of fans. > > Cheers, > -Jamie > http://www.JamieKrutz.com > > > DJ wrote: > > One thing about Macs that appeals to me is the 64 bit OS which can use lots > > of RAM. Some of the best audio PCI hardware out there (RME) doesn't yet have > > 64 bit drivers, though the Fireface does. The new Mac specific Apogee boxes > > look like a very nice option for a native system. I think it's going to be > > another year, at least, before the Vista OS is burned in enough to bring the > > developers to the table with fully functional 64 bit drivers for the UAD-1 > > and RME PCI cards........so to my thinking, OSX has some advantages, > > depending on what hardware you're using. I can tell you this, a big a kludge > > as my system is here, what basically is happening is that I have two > > computers linked together in a manner that produces audio that, s I continue > > to refine my methods, sounds less and less like a digital system and more > > and more like the old analog sound that I grew up with and prefer. I know > > Paris is a big part of that, but so are the UAD-1 processors in the native > > machine. All in all, I guess this could be done with Logic or Cubase on a > > Mac, as well. I haven't paid too much attention to Cubase on a Mac. Is it as > > well integrated as Logic? Somehow I doubt it since Logic is owned by Apple.. > > > > Deej > > > …
creator: Deej [1]
date: 2006-05-21T01:43:48-00:00

Re: More geek stuff-cascading digital signals through 3 x M-Audio Digipatch units.
type: item
description: > > If > >>>>>>> you want to fuss, cool, but time is money. > >>>>>> OK James. I would be really curious to know if you think you could > > set up > >>>>>> two Macs to work exactly like I've got my PC's working and tell me if > >>>>>> everything works perfectly first time. I would be really curious to > > know. > >>>>> My > >>>>>> Paris PC cost me about $500.00. My Native PC cost me around $700.00 > >>>>>> (neither price includes montors or audio hardware). > >>>>>> > >>>>>> You will need a Mac for Paris (which I assume you've already got) and > > it > >>>>>> will need to have at least a 2G CPU, I G of RAM and 4 x video heads.. > > The > >>>>>> Native machine will need to be running Cubase SX and have a dual 2.5G > >>>> CPU, > >>>>> 4 > >>>>>> G RAM, 4 x UAD-1 cards 3 x RME HDSP cards running in two separate > > Magma > >>>>>> chassis' (unless you can somehow cram all of this into a mobo and 1 > >>>> Magma) > >>>>>> and three video heads. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I will admit it took a while to get this working properly on a PC, > >>>> (properly > >>>>>> meaning the *exact* way I had planned it to work) but it certainly > > did > >>>> not > >>>>>> put me out of business for one second or lose me any money because I > > had > >>>>>> total control of the OS and I could work around every glitch I > >>>> encountered > >>>>>> until I found the sweet spot. No downtime........none at > > all........just > >>>>>> lots of options when I needed them while I configured the > >>>>>> system..........and yes, there is some configuration time involved to > > be > >>>>>> sure, but I'm the one doing the configuring rather than having an OS > >>>> handed > >>>>>> to me that has ten tons of crap
creator: Deej [1]
date: 2006-05-21T04:31:54-00:00