+xVwBSm4HXLO2vZ3S6PCZ4M [binary]
zF5yt4d2/RmmN9ZmTfaszcIh4l86zfgiCejrN [binary]
Uia0NukaRwooAYxM [binary]
phjkZcNA+R7mokmVg7d [binary]
hChmiatBJWpCeBPb [binary] S
wmiurOCZHRx3VkI6ZKWfH3V5glY7P [binary]
RR3SyWXhvXlxfdW6EH2zIiLc7HdboXQmuIfPHk [binary]
[binary] cPMP1tzPcZ2KuxV2KuxV2KuxV2KuxV2KuxV2KuxV2KuxV2KuxV2KuxV2KuxV 2KuxV2KuxV2KuxV2KuxV2KuxV2KuxV2KuxV2KuxV2KuxV2KuxV2KuxV2KuxV [binary]
cGTlIJXcSy2rOkk [binary] V2KuxV2KuxV2KuxV2KuxV2KuxV2KuxV2KuxV2KuxV2KuxV2KuxV2KuxV2Kux V2KuxV2KuxV2KuxV2KuxV2KuxV2KuxV2KuxV2KuxV2KuxV2KuxV2KuxV2Kux [binary]
FXYq7FXYq7FXYq7FXYq7FXYq7FXYq7FXYq7FXY [binary] [binary]
>of an assumption here that the Mac can do a terminal service across WiFi). I >do this regularly on my internet desktop and Inspiron because it's better >for me to stay central. Push the output of Paris to a mini radio transmitter >and you should be good to mix in the
/> "DC" <dc@spammersinhell.com> wrote: &
> >>> > these >>> > absorb enough sound/reflections to be useful? Any other >>recommendations? >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> >> http://cgi.ebay.com/FURNITURE-WAREHOUSE-STORAGE-MOVING-BLANK ET-PAD_W0QQitemZ >>> 7410260313QQcategoryZ63591QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewI tem >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> >>> >> >> >Check around your area for commercial office auctions and pick up some free standing office dividers. They will be cheap and do a good job. If you get creative, you can make longer legs to get them off the ground. They can then be placed flat up against a wall when not in use. David. Paul wrote: > I have a somewhat large great room in my house and I'm looking to cut down > on reflections when I record drums in there. Would something like these > absorb enough sound/reflections to be useful? Any other recommendations? > > > <a href="http://cgi.ebay.com/FURNITURE-WAREHOUSE-STORAGE-MOVING-BLANKET-PAD_W0QQitemZ7410260313QQcategoryZ63591QQssPageName
use for exactly this kind of thing. >They >> won't work for LF stuff, but they definitely will absorb the HF/HMF >> reflections.. >> >> "Paul" <pn@nc.nospam.com> wrote in message news:4458968f$1@linux... >> > >> > I have a somewhat large great room in my house and I'm looking to cut >down >> > on reflections when I record drums in there. Would something like these >> > absorb enough sound/reflections to be useful? Any other >recommendations? >> > >> > >> > >> > http://cgi.ebay.com/FURNITURE-WAREHOUSE-STORAGE-MO
ZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem" target="_blank"> http://cgi.ebay.com/FURNITURE-WAREHOUSE-STORAGE-MOVING-BLANK ET-PAD_W0QQitemZ7410260313QQcategoryZ63591QQssPageNameZWDVWQ QrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem > > >In order not to confuse anyone here is my exact test. On a four card Paris system I loaded a B3 tune for 3-4 seconds playing in aloop on a Paris audio track. I pushed the level up to 10and had submix -8.1 I was monitoring via monitor outputs and had the monitor level -12. No on Paris BigEqI had thsi filter highpass at 260Hz and lowpass at 5247, trimmer AT FULL 20 !! This makes all the diffrence now beetween Me and XP. Under XP even at +20 the sound becomes nowhere as distorted (well bad distortion) and the volume stays overall the same as with the BigEq OFF. The trimmer works because lowering it the volume lowers itself too. Now on Me with closed EQ we have the same sound (is it ?) but when eq is engaged with that full +20 there is sever distortion and loudness and fatness. Go figure... Can please someone with both XP and Me partitions check this please ? When I was first using Me for some months and then switched to XP I remember that the sound was different to my ears but I said to myself well, yor ears must be wrong... Now that makes me wonder if many things act differently under XP! Regards, Dimitrios "Dimitrios" <musurgio@otenet.gr> wrote: > >I made some heavy tests here... >Paris eds effects react different (sound different) under Me than in XP. >Now that is most interesting. >I checked with a B3 file and Big Eq from Paris. >Turning all the way up to 20 under Me gave a fat distorted sound. >XP ! >Overall Me (well Paris under Me) sounds fatter and distorts more easily... >Please if you have a second bay disk with me and Xp try a file to hear what >you get ... >I am very very curious and shocked... >Regards, >DimitriosWhat's Paris "Big" EQ? I think I remember checking this when I switched to xp and the files nulled (I'm pretty anal abo
gr> wrote: >> >>In order not to confuse anyone here is my exact test. >> >>On a four card Paris system I loaded a B3 tune for 3-4 seconds playing in >>aloop on a Paris audio track. >>I pushed the level up to 10and had submix -8.1 >>I was monitoring via monitor outputs and had the monitor level -12. >>No on Paris BigEqI had thsi filter highpass at 260Hz and lowpass at 5247, >>trimmer AT FULL 20 !! >>This makes all the diffrence now beetween Me and XP. >> >>Under XP even at +20 the sound becomes nowhere as distorted (well bad distortion) >>and the volume stays overall the same as with the BigEq OFF. >>The trimmer works because lowering it the volume lowers itself too. >> >>Now on Me with closed EQ we have the same sound (is it ?) but when eq is >>engaged with that full +20 there is sever distortion and loudness and fatness. >> >>Go figure... >> >>Can please someone with both XP and Me partitions check this please ? >> >>When I was first using Me for some months and then switched to XP I remember >>that the sound was different to my ears but I said to myself well, yor ears >>must be wrong... >> >>Now that makes me wonder if many things act differently under XP! >> >>Regards, >>Dimitrios >> >>"Dimitrios" <musurgio@otenet.gr> wrote: >>> >>>I made some heavy tests here... >>>Paris eds effects react different (sound different) under Me than in XP. >>>Now that is most interesting. >>>I checked with a B3 file and Big Eq from Paris. >>>Turning all the way up to 20 under Me gave a fat distorted sound. >>>XP ! >>>Overall Me (well Paris under Me) sounds fatter and distorts more easily... >>>Please if you have a second bay disk with me and Xp try a file to hear >what >>>you get ... >>>I am very very curious and shocked... >>>Regards, >>>Dimitrios >> >The Big EQ is the graphic EQ available in 3.0 Don "Rod Lincoln" <rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com> wrote in message news:4458cf9e$1@linux... > > Just to be clear. there is the Paris eds eq, Paris vst emulation of the > eds > eq (by Matt Craig), Freak Q, and Barb-A-Q. Which of those are you talking > about? > Rod > "Rod Lincoln" <<a
href="mailto:rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com" target="_blank">rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com> wrote: >> >>What's Paris "Big" EQ? >>I think I remember checking this when I switched to xp and the files >>nulled >>(I'm pretty anal about this stuff)but it's been so long I can't say for > sure. >>The memory starts going. If I get some time I will check it again. >>Rod >>"Dimitrios" <musurgio&#64
>Now that makes me wonder if many things act differently under XP! >>> >>>Regards, >>>Dimitrios >>> >>>"Dimitrios" <musurgio@otenet.gr> wrote: >>>> >>>>I made some heavy tests here... >>>>Paris eds effects react different (sound different) under Me than in XP. >>>>Now that is most interesting. >>>>I checked with a B3 file and Big Eq from Paris. >>>>Turning all the way up to 20 under Me gave a fat distorted sound. >>>>XP ! >>>>Overall Me (well Paris under Me) sounds fatter and distorts more easily... >>>>Please if you have a second bay disk with me and Xp try a file to hear >>what >>>>you get ... >>>
/> [binary] [binary] f/9//3//f/9//3//f/9//3//f/9//3//f/9//3//f/9//3//f/9//3//f/9/ [binary]